Recent Posts

I am the owner of the #PIZZAGATE Youtube Channel, I decided to share this evidence I came across on a video with few views. Video Proof NASA Use Projection Screening Globe Earth.

The illustration in the middle is not 95% luminosity.

            *** I apologize for my rather approximate English. I'll try my best! ***

 Why is it not 95% luminosity? the best way to know is to calculate! And it's so easy I wonder why you did not do it yourself already.

If alpha is the angle between the directions Moon-Observer and Moon-Sun, the illumination ratio of the moon is given by :  r = (1+cos(alpha))/2  (this is an approximate formula, assuming the light rays coming from the moon are parallel, but the error is very small, and in any case in the right direction...)
Taking into account the data from the Naval Observatory you quoted on your post of Aug. 10, 01:16:53 AM (reply#10), we find that alpha = 26°. This gives an illumination ratio of... 0.9494.  Hence the 0.95 given by the National Obervatory.

So I think everything is ok :  contrary to your feeling, the moon phase in the video at the begining of the thread is perfectly compatible with Round Earth Theory.

Now the next question from me would be : is it compatible with Flat Earth Theory?...
I would very much appreciate if you - or any other authoritative flatearther - post a similar demo for the case of FET, of course with the same parameters (sun and moon altitudes and azimuts, same place and date,...). Is it possible? I don't know enough FE theory to be able to do it myself (in fact I know nearly nothing concerning FET...)

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« Last post by Lord Dave on Today at 05:06:32 PM »

So, summary:
Russia basically tried to get people ready to fight each other, dividing the nation best it could.
While I don't think Trump colluded as this seems very "hit both sides" kinda thing, if he did, it would explain why he was so against polls and his "I'll accept the results if I win." statement.  What better way to sow discord than to have your unpopular front runner claim the election was rigged, lose, and spend the next year complaining about it as loud as possible, asking for people to rise up against a corrupt system.

Having Trump win probably only made it a little harder to sow discord since the super angry base got what they wanted.

Also: Mitch McConnell must hate his job right now.  Having to say "Oh yes, I trust Trump and we're so close." while Trump insults him on twitter.
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Soliloquies
« Last post by devils advocate on Today at 04:19:21 PM »
Dang! Thought it was a bit odd having real female on a flat earth site... :-*
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Soliloquies
« Last post by Boots on Today at 01:29:56 PM »
You're flirting with a dude, dude.
Flat Earth Q&A / How does FET explain the Lowhigh tide?
« Last post by GiantTurtle on Today at 01:13:15 PM »
The wiki states that the high tide is caused by the sun or moons gravity pulling on the water. This does not explain why a high tide would appear on the opposite side of the equator.
Would the flat earth not have a low tide at the furthest point from the sun?
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Sun in spotlight type of thingy.
« Last post by devils advocate on Today at 12:05:48 AM »
Perspective type of thingy, like when planes or thingy types fly overhead they seem to dip towards the horizon type. Thus the sun thingy moves away and appears to dip below the horizon. All on the Wiki-thingy.
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Soliloquies
« Last post by devils advocate on October 21, 2017, 11:44:54 PM »

Ooh she's making a list, she's checking it twice, she'll slaughter us all whether we're naughty or nice,

Like Ms A. Stark from Game of Thrones, she's gonna strip us to our bones

Jura-G is coming to town
Jura-G is hunting me down

Jura-G is tracking me far,
I hope she's as sexy as her avatar

Ne-ver en-rage an Eng-lish rose
Coz she'll burn bog roll in your toes

Even vegan Ladies will kill you

Give Boudicca a spear she'll run you through

I guess J-G what I am trying to write

Is that I do not like it that we fight

Can we please maybe just start again?

I'll be the cock if you're the hen?

Us Brits are few upon this site

I'm sorry if I was a shite

You're right my list was inelegant

I have not been an English Gent

So please J-G another chance?

And we'll unite the GB RE stance?

Or maybe you will choose to carry on the hunt?

After all I am a feckless southern C***

Yeah, I mean, if photons ignored Frame of Reference stuff like that, then any laser you fired would always be off.

Exactly, the speed of light is constant, not the vector.
Flat Earth Q&A / Bottom of clouds are flat?
« Last post by devils advocate on October 21, 2017, 11:03:43 PM »
Hi folks

So reading the Wiki again I see another evidence for the world being flat is that "the bottom of clouds look flat". I'm not sure what this means. I would love to know if any FE thinks this sentence in the Wiki is still relevant or wether it should be removed/edited?

I have seen clouds all across Europe, Canada, West and South East Africa, the Middle east, Singapore and Australia and I cannot relate this flat bottom image to any of these locations. As clouds may be hundreds of miles away or a culmination of multiple individual clouds etc I can not see how we from earth could honestly judge the shape of the "bottom" of them. When flying in planes I approach them from the ground and rise up to and through them and never see this flat edge the wiki refers to.

On a further note so what if they were flat? What is the correlation between the bottom of clouds and the shape of the earth? Does this mean the FE predicts that the clouds mirror the ground below? 

Can anyone explain the Wiki's meaning here please?

Many thanks