1
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Terrible Political Memes
« Last post by junker on Today at 01:54:52 AM »
Like-minded individuals congregate together.People who are strongly for it will be living in places where it will be legal.So all people make their residence location decisions solely based upon whether abortion is legal or not in their area?
It’s unclear what my dwelling has to do with anything.Right. Now that you've confirmed you're trolling, let me make one thing clear: If you're not ready to be sincere in the upper fora, please be ready not to be in the upper fora at all. If you do not make the decision by yourself, one will be made for you.
This thing, being thusly defined, remains undefined.Self-awareness issues?
People who are strongly for it will be living in places where it will be legal.Except for the people who don't. of course.
Infinity, being boundless, remains undefined.Infinity is defined as boundless.
Like-minded individuals congregate together.People who are strongly for it will be living in places where it will be legal.So all people make their residence location decisions solely based upon whether abortion is legal or not in their area?
My legitimate polls state that people who are against it will be living in places where it will not be legal.
I never said it did include the word "assault". It was a question. Does the language allow someone to not be criminally liable if they assault a homosexual person based upon their faith, conviction, or belief in traditional values?People who possess faith, conviction, and traditional values, are not the ones going around assaulting anyone.
You ought to know...I mean you are constantly on this forum questioning the validity of a person's faith, convictions, and traditional values via constant verbal assault and weak humor.
But, anyone committing assault on a homosexual and subsequently apprehended, would likely face criminal charges.
There is nothing wrong with discrimination.People stating they do not condone homosexual behavior are the ones facing criminal or civil penalties, for simply stating that belief.If not, what does opposing homosexuality look like? What constitutes 'opposing homosexuality'? Not wanting to bake a cake for a gay couple's upcoming wedding? Due to your faith, conviction, or belief in traditional values? How about not giving a job to someone because they are abnormally homosexual? Because of your faith, conviction, or belief in traditional values. A lender denying a loan to a gay couple because of their faith, conviction, or belief in traditional values.Yeah, it could look like that.
What is wrong with that?
A little thing called "discrimination".
More people ought to be more discriminating.
I achieve no sense of pride out of either.Where does it end?It ends when you can come up with a valid reason for claiming to have achieved a sense of PRIDE due to committing a sexual act.
Is 'heterosexuality' defined solely by the commission of a sexual act? What about just plain old attraction?
Who cares what they write about their values? I don't care.Who gets to define what 'traditional values' are? You want the government to define for you what 'traditional values' are? That seems quite big-government to me which I thought you were against.Traditional values are the ones established and inculcated in each individual.
When a group of people sharing the same values get together and put them to paper, you write and act as if that is a HUGE PROBLEM.
So if a group of homosexuals gets together and commits their values to paper, that then becomes "traditional values"?