9281
Earth Not a Globe Workshop / Re: Zetetic Method Vs Scientific Method
« on: December 27, 2015, 06:39:29 AM »
Thank you, Thork. I am gathering some notes for this chapter.
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=50588.msg1252998#msg1252998
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=50588.msg1252998#msg1252998
How can you use a "theory" to better understand the universe?Universal accelerator theory, bendy light theory, flat earth theory, etc. Which side are you on again?
A theory doesn't help you understand the universe. A theory is a theory, a possible explanation for how things are. How does a possible explanation help you understand anything?
That aside, in the illustration is all wrong.
Scientific Method is
Ask a Question -> Create a Hypothesis -> Perform an Experiment to prove hypothesis true -> Conclusion.
(Note that in the scientific method you never attempt to prove your hypothesis false or competing hypothesis' true)
The Zetetic Method is
Ask a question -> Perform a series of experiments to test and compare known possible results -> Conclusion
The Zetetic Method is clearly superior, as you are testing contradicting possibilities rather than a single possibility and drawing a conclusion the first time you get a positive result. The Scientific Method leads you to half-truths and bad science.