There are no problems with my answer.
You have a problem, obviously, given the superficiality of your answer.
You simply failed to read the bibliographical material.
I hope that your lack of knowledge is due to just sheer superficiality, and not to some other deeper problems...
Given that the gaps in the periodic table represented by these anticipated un-
stable elements were known to Besant & Leadbeater, how can we be sure that
their descriptions were based upon real objects and were not fabricated ac-
cording to their expectations? Knowing which groups of the periodic table
these undiscovered elements belong to could have enabled them to deduce
what shape their atoms ought to have, having decided upon a rule to link atom-
ic shapes to groups.
Can you read English Gulliver?
But the values of the atomic weights of these elements
were unknown to science at the time when Besant and Leadbeater published
observations of them and yet the "number weights" (defined shortly) that they
calculated for these elements agree with their chemical atomic weights to
within one unit. It is highly implausible that this measure of agreement could
have come about by chance in every case. Furthermore, analysis (Phillips,
1994) of the particles reported to have been observed in the supposed atoms of
these elements undiscovered by science at the time reveals such a high degree
of agreement with the theory presented in this paper to explain micro-psi ob-
servations of atoms
that neither deliberate fabrication nor hallucinations influ-
enced by knowledge of the gaps in the periodic table are realistic explanations
of these elements being examined before their scientific discovery. These two
considerations strongly suggest that the descriptions by Besant and Leadbeat-
er of the supposed atoms of these elements must have been based upon physi-
cal objects, for there is simply no more plausible alternative that can explain
such a measure of agreement. Your incompetence in reading the work cited should worry you...no hallucinations at all.
Secondly,
how could hallucinations, whose cause was located entirely inside their brains
and not outside amongst the trillions of atoms in all the chemicals they exam-
ined, generate UPA populations in MPAs that always turned out to be about 18
times the correct atomic weights of their elements? This is true, remarkable,
even for elements like francium and astatine, whose atomic weights must have
been unknown to Besant and Leadbeater because science discovered them in,
respectively, 1939 and 1940, about seven years after the deaths of the two
Theosophists.
How, if MPAs are not atoms, could they have anticipated in
1908 - five years before scientists suspected the existence of isotopes - the
fact that an element such as neon could have more than one type of atom, an
MPA, moreover, whose calculated number weight of 22.33 is consistent with
their having detected with micro-psi the neon-22 nuclide before the physicist
J. J. Thomson discovered it in 1913? One must turn to particle physics for an-
swers.This paper has presented evidence (summarized in Table 3) of how facts of
nuclear and particle physics are consistent with purported psychic descriptions
of subatomic particles.
It is because Besant and Leadbeater finished their ob-
servations many years before pertinent scientific knowledge became available
that their work cannot be rejected as fraudulent once this consistency is ac-
cepted. Nor can critics plausible interpret their observations as precognitive
visions of future ideas and discoveries of physics. The fact that most of their descriptions of MPAs were published several years before physicists even suspected that atoms had nuclei excludes the possibility of their fraudulent use of scientific knowledge about the composition of nuclei in terms of protons, neutrons and mass numbers because no such information existed then, Chadwick discovering the neutron in 1932, twenty-four years after the first edition of Occult Chemistry appeared. No normal or alternative paranormal explanation of the correlation between modern physics and their ostensible 100-year old observations of subatomic particles appears to exist other than that Besant and Leadbeater genuinely described aspects of the microscopic world by means of ESP.
As for the number of strings...you failed to do your homework.
https://web.archive.org/web/20120128042636/http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_09_4_phillips.pdfRead the sections: Superstrings, Compactification, UPA as Subquark State of Superstring
EDIT
As for the fact that Dr. Dayton Miller does mention a rotating earth, it is due to a misconception which was prevalent in the 1920s: ether and a rotating earth are mutually exclusive concepts, they cannot exist together.
Let me explain, so that even you can understand.
RE theory requires a full void, otherwise the equations which "describe" the orbits of the planets will have to include friction terms.
KEPLER MOTION
In an appropriate coordinate system, the motion of a planet around the sun (considered as fixed) with the attractive force being proportional to the inverse square of the distance /z/ of the planet from the sun is given by the solution of the second order conservative system with the potential function -/z/^-1 for z =/0.
A mechanical system without friction can be described in the Hamiltonian formulation.
References for Celestial Mechanics and Hamiltonian mechanics:
V.I. Arnold, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Springer-Verlag, 1978
C.L. Siegel and J. Moser, Lectures on Celestial Mechanics, Springer-Verlag, 1971
J. Moser, Stable and Random Motions in Dynamical Systems, Princeton Univ. Press, 1973
Area Preserving Maps, Nonintegrable/Nearly Integrable Hamiltonians, KAM Theory:
http://www.math.rug.nl/~broer/pdf/kolmo100.pdfEther = Friction = End of the Hamiltonian formulation of the laws of Celestial Mechanics