*

Offline Pete Svarrior

  • e
  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 9768
  • (>^_^)> it's propaganda time (◕‿◕✿)
    • View Profile
    • The Flat Earth Society
Re: Explain AWT Please
« Reply #20 on: October 04, 2014, 09:06:32 PM »
Well, I've given several chances to stop the "wall of text" replies. I see that you've only worsened your responses. I'm sorry to say that your meaningless ramblings don't earn my further attention.
I'm going to have to ask you to keep your posts on topic. Asking a number of pretentious questions and then complaining that you don't like long, thorough answers is something that should go on your personal blog. If you'd like to start one, the Livejournal community often assumes a style similar to yours, so you may find yourself at home.

Please bear in mind that, much like with your other "this should go on your blog" threads, we will be moving this to AR unless you start taking your own thread seriously.
Read the FAQ before asking your question - chances are we've already addressed it.
Follow the Flat Earth Society on Twitter and Facebook!


*mic stays stationary and earth accelerates upwards towards it*

Re: Explain AWT Please
« Reply #21 on: October 06, 2014, 12:29:30 PM »
gulliver...you simply haven't done your homework.

That is why it is embarrassing to write something like: The term "gravity photons" has no acceptance anywhere.

http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-rpress.asp

http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/V14NO3PDF/V14N3EDW.pdf


BOSONS = PHOTONS = NEUTRINOS, this is the real correct theory of quantum mechanics

Bosons (that is, photons) actually do have mass.

"Let us remember that in one extension to the Standard Model, left- and right-handed neutrinos exist. These Dirac neutrinos acquire mass via the Higgs mechanism but right-handed neutrinos interact much more weakly than any other particles.

Aspden calls the neutrino ‘a figment of the imagination invented in order to make the books balance’ and says that it simply denotes ‘the capacity of the aether to absorb energy and momentum’."


Re: Explain AWT Please
« Reply #22 on: October 06, 2014, 01:12:26 PM »
The Biefeld-Brown effect confirms all the foregoing theory: antigravitational subquarks/magnetic monopoles

When the poles of a freely suspended charged capacitor (even in vacuum) were placed on a horizontal axis, a forward thrust would be produced which would move the capacitor in the direction of the positive pole. The direction of thrust would reverse in conjunction with a polarity change. This is the phenomenon known as the Biefield-Brown Effect.

https://web.archive.org/web/20140327162923/http://projetmontgolfier.info/

I was the U.S Technical Representative for a French aeronautic company, Sociéte National de Construction Aeronautiques du Sud-Ouest, (S.N.C.A.S.O). Dr. Brown came to France twice in the period from 1955 to 1956. Many tests were made. It was decided that the next step was to make tests in a big vacuum chamber. Dr. Brown again sent us designs for the construction of a large vacuum chamber and test apparatus.



As this phase of the project was undertaken my company was merged into another company. During this turbulent period of the merger we were able, with difficulty, to continue and complete the construction of the large vacuum chamber, though moved to a less hospitable location. The president of my company, now the president of the new merged company, Sud-Aviation, decided not to continue the experiments but to pass them along to another company S.N.E.C.M.A. (Société Nationale d'Étude et de Construction de Moteurs d'Aviation) that was more specialized in this type of research.



The team made some hasty tests before having the project shut down for delivery of the vacuum chamber to the new company. The Final Report for the Projet Mongolfier, April 15, 1959, outlined these five tests confirming, as in the prior tests, that there was a definable force.







These vacuum chamber experiments were a decisive milestone in that they demonstrated beyond a doubt that electrogravitic propulsion was a real physical phenomenon.


ORIGINAL PAPER SUBMITTED BY DR. TOWNSEND BROWN, IN 1955, VACUUM CHAMBER EXPERIMENTS:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140108015427/http://projetmontgolfier.info/TT_Brown_Proposal.html

More details here:

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=59837.msg1552735#msg1552735

PROJECT MONTGOLFIER, FINAL RESULTS:

https://web.archive.org/web/20140327162923/http://projetmontgolfier.info/



https://web.archive.org/web/20140108015313/http://projetmontgolfier.info/INDEX_TO_REPORTS.php

https://web.archive.org/web/20130522083124/http://projetmontgolfier.info/uploads/Section_3__Final_Report.pdf

PAGE 26 FULLY DESCRIBES THE OBSERVED BIEFELD BROWN EFFECT IN FULL VACUUM CHAMBER

When the DISK SHAPED CAPACITOR WAS USED, the total deviation/movement was A FULL 30 DEGREES (deviation totale du systeme 30 degre).

The Final Report for the Projet Mongolfier, April 15, 1959, outlined these five tests confirming, as in the prior tests, that there was a definable force.


VIDEO: BIEFELD-BROWN EFFECT IN VACUUM


http://jnaudin.free.fr/lifters/ascvacuum/


http://jnaudin.free.fr/lifters/ascvacuum/ascinvacuum.wmv



These tests have been performed in the NASA NSSTC LEEIF vacuum chamber at the Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville (Alabama).
The vacuum is a High Vacuum at 1.72 x 10^-6 Torr, this is equal of vacuum space conditions at about 350 km far from the earth ground. For information, flying at an altitude of 100 km is equal to a space flight...
In the video of the tests, two asymmetrical capacitors are mounted on a rotating arm with a torsion wire used as a rotational axis.
A potential difference between the wire and the main armature of the asymmetrical capacitor is slowly increased from 0 to +45 KV.

At the atmospherical pressure, we can observe a thrust in the plan of rotation and directly applied on the asymmetrical capacitors when the voltage is increased from 0 to +45 KV. This produces a torque on the apparatus. When the voltage is back down to 0 V, the device retrieves its initial position.
At the pressure of 1.72 x 10^-6 Torr ( High Vacuum conditions ), the apparatus rotates when the High Voltage is increased from 0 to +45 KV. However the thust observed is weaker than at the atmospherical pressure. When the voltage is back down to 0 V, the device retrieves its initial position.

This experiment is very interesting and shows definitely that a force is produced on asymmetrical capacitors when a High Voltage of +45KV is applied between their armatures in a High Vacuum ( 1.72 x 10^-6 Torr ).



Albert Einstein,Relativity, The special and the general theory, 11th ed., 1936, p.64:

“In contrast to electric and magnetic fields, the gravitational field exhibits a most remarkable property, which is of fundamental importance ... Bodies which are moving under the sole influence of a gravitational field receive an acceleration, which does not in the least depend either on the material or the physical state of the body.”


Dr. Thomas Townsend Brown proved the fallacy of Einstein's statetment; also the Biefeld-Brown effect shows that terrestrial gravity and antigravity are electrical forces of opposite spin.


Complete demolition of the concept of space-time:

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=61637.msg1615025#msg1615025


Magnetic monopoles discovered for the first time:

http://www.london-nano.com/research-and-facilities/highlight/magnetic-monopoles-discovered-by-lcn-scientists
http://www.london-nano.com/research-and-facilities/highlight/%E2%80%98magnetricity%E2%80%99-observed-and-measured-for-the-first-time
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2014/jan/30/magnetic-monopoles-seen-in-the-lab

MAGNETIC MONOPOLES AND MAXWELL'S ORIG. SET OF EQS.

http://www.gsjournal.net/old/science/tombe.pdf


http://www.smphillips.8m.com/pdfs/ESP_of_Quarks.pdf

A rigorous and extraordinary demonstration that subquarks = magnetic monopoles.
« Last Edit: October 06, 2014, 01:14:42 PM by sandokhan »

Offline Gulliver

  • *
  • Posts: 682
    • View Profile
Re: Explain AWT Please
« Reply #23 on: October 06, 2014, 02:18:43 PM »
gulliver...you simply haven't done your homework.

That is why it is embarrassing to write something like: The term "gravity photons" has no acceptance anywhere.

http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-rpress.asp

http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/V14NO3PDF/V14N3EDW.pdf


BOSONS = PHOTONS = NEUTRINOS, this is the real correct theory of quantum mechanics

Bosons (that is, photons) actually do have mass.

"Let us remember that in one extension to the Standard Model, left- and right-handed neutrinos exist. These Dirac neutrinos acquire mass via the Higgs mechanism but right-handed neutrinos interact much more weakly than any other particles.

Aspden calls the neutrino ‘a figment of the imagination invented in order to make the books balance’ and says that it simply denotes ‘the capacity of the aether to absorb energy and momentum’."
Did you perhaps cite the wrong reference? Neither has the text "gravity photon".

You also seem to argue that neutrinos exist and then quote Aspden that they don't. Which is it?

How did you determine that photons have rest mass?
Don't rely on FEers for history or physics.
[Hampton] never did [go to prison] and was never found guilty of libel.
The ISS doesn't accelerate.

Re: Explain AWT Please
« Reply #24 on: October 06, 2014, 02:41:17 PM »
You are continuing your trolling activities.

http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/V14NO3PDF/V14N3EDW.pdf

the section BASIC NATURE OF GRAVITONS AND GRAVITATION

quote: "gravitons are a kind of virtual photon..."


http://www.blazelabs.com/f-g-rpress.asp

"The radiation can be visualised as a shower of high energy EM waves imparting impulses of momentum to all bodies in space. It also explains the great difficulty we have to shield anything from such force. The energy of each individual photon is a crucial component of the momentum necessary to create pressure for gravity to be possible. The shadow of incoming high energy EM wave packets can be pictured as the carriers of the gravitational force, the normal role assigned to the theoretical graviton. Hence, gravitons have been theorised due to the lack of knowledge of radiation pressure and radiation shadowing, and that's why they will never be detected. If photons represent the luminance of electromagnetic radiation, then, gravitons represent the shadowing and can be considered as negative energy waves, lack of photons or photon-holes. In a way, its very similar to the way we describe electrons and electron holes in semiconductors."


I know my references very well, gulliver, rest assured.


Photons must have mass: read, for example, http://gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Research%20Papers-Quantum%20Theory%20/%20Particle%20Physics/Download/673


Modern science has begun to accept that neutrinos do have mass, and that they do come in two flavors: left and right-handed.

This was the reason for inserting that reference.


But a neutrino is a particle of ether.

"The neutrino was first postulated in 1930 when it was found that, from the standpoint of relativity theory, beta decay (the decay of a neutron into a proton and an electron) seemed to violate the conservation of energy. Wolfgang Pauli saved the day by inventing the neutrino, a particle that would be emitted along with every electron and carry away energy and momentum (the emitted particle is nowadays said to be an antineutrino).

W.A. Scott Murray described this as ‘an implausible ad hoc suggestion designed to make the experimental facts agree with the theory and not far removed from a confidence trick’.

W. Pauli introduced the notion of the neutrino, BASED TOTALLY ON THE ORBITING ELECTRON MODEL OF BOHR; here are some comments:

THE ELUSIVE NEUTRINO: In my opinion the neutrino concept is the work of a relativistic accountant who tries to balance his books by making a fictitious entry. He does not recognize the existence of the aether and so, when accounting for something where an energy transaction involves an energy transfer to or from the aether, he incorporates an entry under the heading 'neutrinos'."



Re: Explain AWT Please
« Reply #25 on: October 06, 2014, 02:47:44 PM »
On the equivalence of photons and the bubble of light presented in the Occult Chemistry, Nature of Matter chapter:

http://blog.hasslberger.com/docs/HeuristicApproach_BourneIE91.pdf

And that photon/boson does have mass.

http://www.smphillips.8m.com/news.html

section News item #9 (July 14, 2012): Rediscovery of the Higgs boson

Re: Explain AWT Please
« Reply #26 on: October 07, 2014, 01:02:10 PM »
Let us now take a look at another proof of the existence of subquark strings (ether)...

LAMOREAUX-CASIMIR EFFECT: THE ULTIMATE PROOF OF THE EXISTENCE OF PRESSURE GRAVITY

Newton, student notes on Descartes:

Gravity is a force in a body impelling it to descend. Here, however, by descent is not only meant a motion towards the centre of the Earth but also towards any part or region...

His belief at that time was that, to quote Westfall, ‘gravity (heaviness) is caused by the descent of a subtle invisible matter which strikes all bodies and carries them down'.

In the following decade, and deriving from his alchemical studies, Newton came to develop his views on the workings of the gravity-ether. As communicated to the Royal Society in December of 1675 and written up in their History, it went as follows:

Newton: in which descent it may bear down with it the bodies it pervades with a force proportional to the superficies of all their parts it acts upon...

In other words, the larger the surface of body, the greater the force of gravity acting upon it. After condensing, this gravity ether descends into the bowels of the earth to be refreshed, and then arises until it ‘vanishes again into the aetherial spaces.'

Here is a letter from Newton to Halley, describing how he had independently arrived at the inverse square law using his aether hypothesis, to which he refers as the 'descending spirit':

....Now if this spirit descends from above with uniform velocity, its density and consequently its force will be reciprocally proportional to the square of its distance from the centre. But if it descended with accelerated motion, its density will everywhere diminish as much as the velocity increases, and so its force (according to the hypothesis) will be the same as before, that is still reciprocally as the square of its distance from the centre'


A clear description of PRESSURE GRAVITY.


On the real causes of the Casimir effect:

"Each of the plates in the Casimir effect displace the aether. The displaced aether which exists between the plates is pushing back toward each of the plates which causes the force associated with the aether displaced by each of the plates which exists between the plates to offset. This aether is more at rest than the aether which is displaced by the plates which encompasses the plates. The reduced force associated with the aether which exists between the plates along with the displaced aether which encompasses the plates which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the plates causes the plates to be forced together.



In zero-point energy theory, it is now believed that the Casimir force works in exactly the same way. This force is created when the distance between the plates becomes so narrow that no "virtual particles" or aetheric energies are able to fit between them.

So, there is no "sucking" going on at all; in fact it is a complete absence of energy that exists between the plates, aetheric or otherwise. And so, a form of "aether vacuum" is formed between the two plates, where no aether can flow inside the crack. Then, the surrounding "virtual particle flux" or aether pressure pushes the plates together from the outside!

In Dr. Puthoff‘s model, this pressure is believed to be caused by the “virtual particles ” themselves, as they will continually emerge from the zero-point energy long enough to exert a constant force upon the plates, thus pushing them together. Either way, it all comes back to a fundamentally aetheric design, and no other model seems to adequately explain why this incredibly powerful Casimir effect would occur.

Bearing this in mind, we are continuing to see how the background aetheric energy plays a role in the world that we can observe. The Casimir effect reveals to us exactly how much pressure the aether is truly exerting on us. And yet, since Dr. Puthoff and most other theorists believe that it always "cancels out" to zero, we can never detect any major changes in the world around us."




Steve Lamoreaux (Yale University): proof of the existence of negative energy (zero point vacuum energy - that is, subquark strings/telluric currents/magnetic monopoles double torsion strings):

starts at 9:31 (negative energy and pressure gravity experiment)


Steve reasoned that if he created a narrow-enough region of empty space like the area between the two ships, then some of the shimmering zero-point energy would not fit inside it.
The energy of empty space outside the narrow region would be stronger and force it to shrink.
That force would be the signature of negative energy, and Steve set out to create it in his lab.
It was an idea that would consume him for more than a decade.


Inside this vacuum chamber are two small metal plates sitting less than the width of a human hair apart from one another.
To get them that close and not touch, the metal has to be perfectly flat, down almost to the atomic level.
The zero-point fluctuations of free space won't fit between those plates, as well, so when you bring these two plates together, there are fewer fluctuations between the plates than there are outside the plates.

The force builds up, and it actually gets stronger and stronger as the plates get closer together, and that force we refer to as arising from negative energy.
The zero-point energy fluctuations outside the plates are stronger than those between, so pressure from the outside pushes them together.


Or think of it another way.
The negative energy between the plates expands space around it.
Steve's years of meticulous labor have made him the first person on Earth to have measured a force produced by negative energy.



(see http://milesmathis.com/caven.html for a complete presentation of the tremendous errors inherent in the experiment "performed" by Cavendish)


http://www.rexresearch.com/nipher/nipher1.htm

The relationship between gravitation and the electric field was first observed experimentally by Dr. Francis Nipher. Dr. Francis Nipher conducted extensive experiments during 1918, on a modified Cavendish experiment. He reproduced the classical arrangements for the experiment, where gravitational attraction could be measured between free-swinging masses, and a large fixed central mass. Dr. Nipher modified the Cavendish experiment by applying a large electrical field to the large central mass, which was sheilded inside a Faraday cage. When electrostatic charge was applied to the large fixed mass, the free-swinging masses exhibited a reduced attraction to the central mass, when the central mass was only slightly charged. As the electric field strength was increased, there arose a voltage threshold which resulted in no attraction at all between the fixed mass and the free-swinging masses. Increasing the potential applied to the central mass beyond that threshold, resulted in the free-swinging masses being repelled (!) from the fixed central mass. Nipher's conclusion was that sheilded electrostatic fields directly influence the action of gravitation. He further concluded that gravitation and electrical fields are absolutely linked.

Dr. Francis Nipher, one of the most distinguished physicists of the 20th century:

http://www.accessgenealogy.com/missouri/biography-of-francis-eugene-nipher-ll-d.htm



The Beam Neutrino and the Ring Laser Gyroscope threads can be addressed only by using the ether/aether theory...otherwise the UAFE fails miserably to even attempt to explain these two very important phenomena.