Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I always love watching conservatives, who are very pro-personal liberties, defend the government telling people what they can or can't do with their bodies.
Fine. Serious stuff. I think the US committed to a defense pact with Sweden and Finland to bridge the gap between application and approval. Since the US is like 80% of NATO it's effectively like being in NATO if that news was correct.
But this is the peril in a treaty organization getting too big. Eventually we get shitheads. It might be time to create NATO 2.0 and not include countries like Hungary and Turkey. Maybe a EU 2.0 while they're at it to kick those two countries out also.
Is the current legislation in the USA making it impossible for a boyfriend to abandon his pregnant girlfriend, or is there indication that SCOTUS plans to rule along those lines?
Erdogan cites concerns over ‘terrorists’ in Sweden and Finland
Rushy is a sweetheart.
This is a shocking turn around by you. I am glad you were open to having your mind changed.
A serial killer would be more than once.
So then a woman receiving an abortion can't be Jeffrey Dahmer. I accept your retraction.
It is no surprise that women willing to murder their own children don't regret it.Because they don't regard it as such.
Nor do you.
I've literally had an abortion and I never once regretted it and I rarely think about it. I did not suffer emotionally.
I've literally had an abortion and I never once regretted it and I rarely think about it. I did not suffer emotionally.
By Rushy’s “rationale” you are literally a serial killer.
lol the majority of women do not have any regrets about their abortions and generally rarely think about them. https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2020/01/416421/five-years-after-abortion-nearly-all-women-say-it-was-right-decision-study
https://www.healthline.com/health-news/study-finds-99-of-women-say-they-do-not-regret-having-an-abortion
So therein lies the Premeditated murder as a charge and ensuing penalty - Murder 1, life in prison without parole or death penalty.
Back to the first part of my question, in States that, let's say, ban abortions altogether, would you advocate that all reported miscarriages be vetted by some authority to make sure they weren't induced, that they weren't murder?
So anything less than death would just be an inconvenience?
Markjo made the tapeworm comparison. Tom Bishop then said people acknowledge killing a tapeworm so killing = murder. I was just being pedantic about how you literally can't murder a tapeworm.
I don't see a difference between a woman purposefully ending her pregnancy because it inconveniencesOn this line of thought though, where would you draw the line between inconvenience and genuine life changing harm?
For the record, I never said anything about what was human versus what was parasitic.
I don't see a difference between a woman purposefully ending her pregnancy because it inconveniences her versus a woman killing her toddler because it inconveniences her.Yes you do.QuoteThey're all children, the only difference is age.No they aren't.
I didn't know this when I wrote the above, but Morning After Pills (ex., "Plan B") aren't abortion pills, they are simply contraceptives. RU-486, in contrast, is an "abortion" pill. It induces a miscarriage and the results are pretty much indistinguishable from a "natural" miscarriage.
And if somehow found to be induced, what sort of penalties would you levy against the woman?
I wasn't aware humans could resemble a heavy period and flush down the toilet.
Just to be safe, let’s lock up anyone who has a miscarriage. They might have done it on purpose. It’s the only way to make sure everyone is putting enough value on human life.
/s
Do you make exceptions for:
- Incest - Y/N
- Rape - Y/N
- Life threat to mother - Y/N
- Morning-After Pills - Y/N
- IUDs - Y/N
Do people murder tapeworms?
But when does it become human?
Also, whenever anyone pro-choice "just admits" or "just owns" that, yes, they totally support killing babies, the discussion immediately turns into "Aha! They admit it! How old does a child have to be before their parents lose the right to murder them at will, you sicko? Three? Four?" It's not a good-faith debate tactic. The distinction between terminating a pregnancy and killing a baby is there to establish scope. It's not simply something that pro-choice people frantically tell themselves to soothe their consciences.
Where's the exact line where something is considered "alive"?
Is it at fertilization? Are AATW's testube contents "alive"?
Every ova and every sperm is a potential human.
When is terminating a pregnancy equivalent to murdering a baby?
Then I suppose it's a good thing for *abortion* to go away, then.Good thing for who? We don't need more people.
Abortion won't go away, it'll only be illegal. It will be as successful as the war on drugs.
Ironic that the side that's "more aware" of "crises" would prefer to castrate their own genealogical lines resulting in the "wrong" ideology proliferating over their own.I wasn't aware political ideology was genetic.