"Everyone", in general, are also ignorant of exact DoD classification rules and guidelines.
Which continues to be irrelevant.
This was clearly chat which was not meant for the public domain.
Actually in the fuller statement he expands that he's embarrassed that he was associated with a vile journalist
He said "it's embarrassing, yes, we'll get to the bottom of it". The "this" clearly being, if you look at the interview, that Goldberg was included in the group.
He, of course, then goes on to attack Goldberg. Because that's how this administration rolls.
It's not fine.
Oh thank fuck, finally some progress.
So stop flailing around looking at whether this was technically classified information and whether it endangered the mission.
It's not that relevant.
The issue is the lack of seriousness and competence at the highest levels of US government that something like this could happen.
The main problem is that the journalist involved is a known liar
The fact that the person who accidentally got added in to the chat is antagonistic to this administration and that no-one noticed he was in there makes this worse. Although luckily for Waltz, Goldberg may not be a fan of Trump but he has some integrity. You, of course, will dispute that. But let's look at the evidence. Goldberg didn't publish any of the details of the mission until the mission had finished. And he initially planned not to do it at all, he just flagged up that he'd been added in to the chat. He could have kept quiet - who knows, he might have been added in to other chats and seen more things, that would have been a useful source of information for a journalist. But instead he said what had happened so they could fix it. Then when the administration started attacking him and calling him a liar he was like "oh cool, so you'd be OK with me publishing the details?" and they said "er, rather you didn't old chap". After much deliberation he decided to publish given that the mission had been completed and he was being called a liar.
This is the MO of this administration. Everyone antagonistic to them is a liar or a bad person or <insert other pejoratives here>.
It's a trick Trump has pulled for years which has proven depressingly effective - try and disparage and discredit the very people who should be holding him to account, the people who should be scrutinising his words and actions. If Trump can do that then HE becomes the source of truth. He can do anything he likes because the people who should be providing the checks and balances aren't there. I can see why he admires people like Putin. I don't want to go all Godwin's law but holy shit, dude, this is dangerous stuff. It's setting you down a road which I don't think you as a country want to go down.