Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Lord Dave

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 326  Next >
1
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: November 02, 2024, 11:39:24 PM »
My view:
If a baby is malformed and will suffer and die horribly shortly after being born, week 24 abortions should be allowed.  I would not to bring in a child just so they can suffer and die.

2
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: November 02, 2024, 09:28:34 AM »
No mainstream politician thinks that all abortions should be allowed with zero rules or regulations that take into account things like the progression of the pregnancy.

Okay, how about your main favorite right now. What limits on abortion does Kamala Harris want? This was a specific question asked to her at the Trump-Kamala debate.

Kamala has clearly shown herself to be an abortion extrimist.
This is largely irrelevant as SCOTUS has already ruled and until a NEW SCOTUS rules differently, it's in the hands of states.  Nothing short of a constitutional amendment would change it.

3
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: October 31, 2024, 03:07:49 PM »
Even in red Districts?

4
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: October 31, 2024, 11:01:12 AM »
^ITT LD claims ID's are easier to fake than a piece of paper.
Oh faking the ballot paper is easy.
Putting in the right ID number, not so much.  How would you do that? How would you know it?
How would you know what number to use on an ID?

Do we really need to have this discussion?

Everyone here already knows your take.

You want everyone and anyone to be able to vote by mail, simply because of "reasons."

It is a bullshit position to take because of increased risk to the election process, as evidenced by the example you provided.

The ID number on your ID card  can be anything number.  The election workers have no way to verify it. 

5
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: October 31, 2024, 10:13:00 AM »
^ITT LD claims ID's are easier to fake than a piece of paper.
Oh faking the ballot paper is easy.
Putting in the right ID number, not so much.  How would you do that? How would you know it?

6
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: October 31, 2024, 07:18:03 AM »
^ITT, LD champions the cause of "vote early, vote often!"

Truly the rallying cry of democracy!

GTFO with your bullshit.

How does one vote often without going to multiple polling places in person?  Ballots all have an ID number for each voter.  So one ballot will be counted no matter how many copies you have.
But in person?  No checking up on that system.  Just an ID (fake is easy to get) and a signature that some old folks must check.

Yeah, how is in person more secure again?

7
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: October 30, 2024, 06:56:46 PM »
Ok so if mail in voting for people outside the US is ok, why isn't it ok for people INSIDE the US?
LMMFAO!!!

Look at the example you provided for why it isn't ok.

So you don't know.  Gotcha.Look, I realize I posted an article about ballot boxes and mail-in ballots getting blown up and destroyed and I wanted to include that I feel this is unjust and unfair for these ballots to not be counted, even though there is no real way for anyone to possibly know the ones that were destroyed were filed legitimately by eligible voters, according to US law.
Fixed your post for you. Simply adding 100 percent reality to a situation where I fully understand you would be unable to do so.
You mean to tell me that its impossible to know if a ballot was real or not after it's been destroyed beyond reading?  Wow!  Your powers of deduction are fucking amazing.

Good thing they're asking those people who might be impacted to vote again.
"Might be impacted..." the meaning of words are lost on you and so is the necessity of evidence in ensuring "free and fair elections."

If you were in that area and claimed you had placed a ballot in a box that was blown up, I wouldn't fucking believe it all.

Might be impacted is fairly easy to understand.
Not everyone who voted early, voted in that box.  Nor at the time their ballot would be there.  So "might be impacted" was correct.  And by impacted ai mean their constitutional right to vote being impacted. 

8
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: October 30, 2024, 06:18:23 PM »
Ok so if mail in voting for people outside the US is ok, why isn't it ok for people INSIDE the US?
LMMFAO!!!

Look at the example you provided for why it isn't ok.

So you don't know.  Gotcha.Look, I realize I posted an article about ballot boxes and mail-in ballots getting blown up and destroyed and I wanted to include that I feel this is unjust and unfair for these ballots to not be counted, even though there is no real way for anyone to possibly know the ones that were destroyed were filed legitimately by eligible voters, according to US law.
Fixed your post for you. Simply adding 100 percent reality to a situation where I fully understand you would be unable to do so.
You mean to tell me that its impossible to know if a ballot was real or not after it's been destroyed beyond reading?  Wow!  Your powers of deduction are fucking amazing.

Good thing they're asking those people who might be impacted to vote again.

9
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: October 30, 2024, 04:05:26 PM »
Ok so if mail in voting for people outside the US is ok, why isn't it ok for people INSIDE the US?
LMMFAO!!!

Look at the example you provided for why it isn't ok.

So you don't know.  Gotcha.

10
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: October 30, 2024, 03:05:21 PM »
Timeline:

You post some article about ballot boxes being blown up...where?...here in the US...

I post a response stating these stupid incidents occurring in the US are actually a great argument for ELECTION DAY being just that. ELECTION DAY...one person, one ID, one vote...Nothing about anyone being deprived of their right to vote.

You post the typical "THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!" claptrap response.

None of what you originally posted has anything to do with "in-person voting."

I didn't write anything about doing away with the rights of eligible persons living outside of the US to cast a vote in the manner in which they have done so in past elections.

I simply wrote the truth...it is the "THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!", cult (of which you are a card-carrying member) that enacted this bullshit approach to "free and fair elections," that result in stories like you referenced in the first place.

Spare yourself further embarrassment and take a break from the forums.

Ok so if mail in voting for people outside the US is ok, why isn't it ok for people INSIDE the US?

11
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: October 30, 2024, 12:22:35 PM »
Kindly point to the post where I wrote, "fuck military people."
You didn't, specifically.  But that was your general concept.  Anyone not able to physically go to their voting area should not be allowed to vote.

I merely condensed it into something you'd read.
You are correct. I didn't specifically write that.

Because none of what I wrote indicates "military people," or any other group would be deprived of their right to vote.

None of the current bullshit way of early voting is designed to ensure the right of "military persons," to vote.

That is just some more "THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!" shit you threw against the wall.

Ok.  So...

Quote
You cast your ballot IN PERSON, presenting a valid photo ID.

One person, one vote.

If it turns out you can't vote for "reasons," too bad, too sad.

Perhaps you should clarify what isn't "reasons".  Or what you define as IN PERSON because if you can't go to your voting district, how does one vote in person?  Or do you mean any location is fine to vote from?

12
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: October 30, 2024, 07:40:52 AM »
Kindly point to the post where I wrote, "fuck military people."
You didn't, specifically.  But that was your general concept.  Anyone not able to physically go to their voting area should not be allowed to vote.

I merely condensed it into something you'd read.

13
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: October 29, 2024, 08:29:06 PM »
It is called "ELECTION DAY,"

You cast your ballot IN PERSON
Well this is going to blow your mind...

https://www.usa.gov/early-voting
My mind is blown that we got to the point of allowing this kind of whatinthefuckistan type of bullshit in the first place.

People who want this kind of approach in terms of "fair elections," are, in fact, the ones who are practicing unfair shit.

Again. the words "ELECTION DAY," ring pretty loud.

Yeah, fuck military folk!  They should never be allowed to vote.  Or people who work alot.
Or the disabled.
We should probably ban non-property owners too.
Nobody said "fuck military folk."

Nobody said people who "work alot."

Nobody said anything about banning "non-property owners."

Except you, of course...easily the most prominent citizen of Whatinthefuckistan to post in this forum.
You did.
How, exactly, is a solider deployed outside of their voting district, going to go to their voting district on election day and vote?

14
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: October 29, 2024, 03:06:33 PM »
It is called "ELECTION DAY,"

You cast your ballot IN PERSON
Well this is going to blow your mind...

https://www.usa.gov/early-voting
My mind is blown that we got to the point of allowing this kind of whatinthefuckistan type of bullshit in the first place.

People who want this kind of approach in terms of "fair elections," are, in fact, the ones who are practicing unfair shit.

Again. the words "ELECTION DAY," ring pretty loud.

Yeah, fuck military folk!  They should never be allowed to vote.  Or people who work alot.
Or the disabled.
We should probably ban non-property owners too.

16
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: October 25, 2024, 07:42:34 PM »
You wanna go by the price of bread or the wages paid by private companies?
I think I already spelled it out.

The average American cares about the price of eggs, gas, and rent.

A vast majority of average Americans do not like the direction things are going.

So they're angry at...
Farmers.
Oil speculators.
And landlords.

And at which point does the government become communist and tell the private sector how much these things should cost?

17
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: October 25, 2024, 05:54:37 PM »
If anything, I am more pissed about Harris flat-out lying to everyone about the economy.
The US economy is pretty strong. That isn't an opinion, it's just numbers:

https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/economy/us-economic-forecast/united-states-outlook-analysis.html

Also. You understand that things outside the US's control affect things?
Once again, it seems you do not understand how Mr. and Mrs. John Q. Public define the word "economy."

Their definition has absolutely jack shit to do with the bullshit source you provided.

I call it a bullshit source strictly because of how the average American views the economy.

And no doubt there are outside forces. Again, nobody in the US gives a fuck about that and those outside forces have nothing to do with the lying cunt.

You wanna go by the price of bread or the wages paid by private companies?

18
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: October 24, 2024, 09:05:07 PM »
Unless someone who knew her from that time comes forward to confirm or deny her claim - in which case if it's the former the people determined to disbelieve her will say they're lying anyway.
They did.  But its been largely ignored.

19
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: October 24, 2024, 12:45:20 PM »
Firstly, it's extremely unlikely that the IRS is hanging onto records of the income tax that a fast-food worker paid forty years ago; secondly, there's no good reason (both in the sense of Kamala's political interests and the public interest) to ask them to try to verify Kamala's McDonald's employment; thirdly, that's not a thing the IRS would do even if there was a good reason to verify Kamala's McDonald's employment; and fourthly, Trump and his supporters would immediately label any evidence the IRS produced as fabricated, so what would even be the point? Nobody who isn't already a ride-or-die Trump fan doubts that Kamala worked at McDonald's when she was younger, because it's entirely believable and would be an utterly pointless thing to lie about.

Wow, what a convent slew of semi-plausible excuses.

“IRS doesn’t have it”
“If they do have it, it doesn’t matter”
“If it does matter, they won’t release it”
“If they do release it, then it’s fabricated”
“If it isn’t fabricated, then it’s not relevant”

It reminds me of the narcissist’s prayer. Which I guess is fitting for Kamala.

Why did you mash two sides of the argument?

20
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: October 23, 2024, 08:06:14 PM »

Harris isn't necessarily a liar. Maybe she really does believe she worked at McDonald's, despite having never worked there.
How did you come by this assertion?

Where do you see an assertion in my post?

Quote
despite having never worked there.
That part.  Its pretty clear you consider her lying.  A claim without evidence is not a lie, its simply unproven.  Perhaps unprovable. 

Of course, according to one of her freinds, she did.

From the article I liked on page 15

Quote
A friend of Harris, Wanda Kagan, told the New York Times that she recalled Harris having worked at McDonald's around that time. That recollection was based on what Harris' mother, who died in 2009, told her years ago, the Times reported.
Its not great evidence, but its still evidence.  More than Trump has that she didn't.


Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 326  Next >