Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Alright, smartass. What I actually mean is what would my Bitcoin be worth in Dollars ($$$) or Norwegian Krone (NOK)?
@Rushy
If I buy 1 bitcoin and wait 9 years, what would my bitcoin be worth?
In context of bombs, then yes, radiation is most certainly evidence of a nuclear bomb. That is unless you can show that TNT or other conventional bombs produce radiation similar to that expected from nuclear bombs.
No. She exposed herself to it by carrying radium around in her pockets.
Right. And the result was substantially different than what you get when a bomb is detonated. In the Chernobyl incident radio active substances like cesium 137 and iodine 131 were released.
Because you are wrong. There are different types and profiles of radiation release. Atomic/nuclear bombs are unique in the extreme. No other process/event produces a radiation release profile like a nuclear bomb. Nothing.
Go back and read your OP. "It's Fake!" is all it says. No evidence whatsoever. Typical flat earth "theory" there.
Considering all of the recent fearmongering regarding Putin using nuclear weapons, I felt it necessary to remind everyone here that nuclear weapons simply do not exist.
They're not real.
They're made up.
It's a meme.
Seriously, they are nothing other than WWII propaganda that the Allies made up to scare Japan into surrendering and to keep Russia from continuing the war. Then Russia started to claim it also totally had nukes and yet no one ever used them. Suspiciously, no one anywhere ever uses them! Wow! It must be because humanity is so strong willed and moral and definitely not because they don't exist.You realize (I'm sure you do) that pink elephants can fly on the winds of time?
You should really read the things you write before you post. Why did you even bother posting it? Did you think stating the wondrous fanciful tales of your imagination was actually relevant to the thread? I can only assume the answer is yes.
I did. Except for the 10 million ton crates of TNT in my yard (there are only 2). The rest are all facts. Your incredulity does not change that. Sorry.
Also the reality of atomic bombs is a fact. Nagasaki and Hiroshima were also not fire bombed. The vast majority of the people that died in both of those incidents died due to radiation effects some time after the detonations. Specifically from the kind of radiation that is released from a nuclear detonation such as gamma and neutron radiation which make up approximately 50% of the energy released. Radiation that is singularly missing from fire bombing. So .. sorry .. you are wrong about that too.
Oh yeah. One of those 10 million ton crates of TNT. I still have 3 or 4 of those in my back yard for clearing tree stumps.
You realize (I'm sure you do) that TNT does not explode with enough speed and force to create a mushroom cloud like that, don't you?
Yep. Sure is a good thing!
Not to mention - Rushy, if they had incredibly perfect AI that had been developed in secret for years, I assure you they wouldn’t use it for something as harmless as some rover pictures.
Bitcoin seems to be not in a good shape nowadays. What do you think of that? Is it a good time to invest in cryptos or is it better to wait some time to see what will happen to them?
somewhere in saudi arabia
get the camelIf only there were some kind of image generating machine that could generate novel images constantly and output them on demand
Which one?
J-Man, I’m not sure where the Saudi Arabia claim is coming from.
Rushy, Martian imagery predates AI images as we know it. In fact, it’s only in the last couple years or so that AI art became more than just mush. Also, there are fairly obvious tells even from the best AI image generation tools. They don’t hold up to close detail, they smudge, they turn text to gibberish, etc. The rover images are consistent between every picture and show the exact same tiny details of the rover, with all its symbols and text. AI does not do this.
There is no evidence of that. Even Musk's much-hyped "Twitter Files" supposedly bringing Twitter's terrible corruption and liberal bias to light showed Yoel Roth participating in discussions with other Twitter employees where they eventually decided how to handle certain situations. Completely different from Musk's unilateral decision-making.
Right, so you agree with me on this subject, and yet your issue lies not with the person falsely claiming to be a free speech purist and using that as the justification for what he's doing, but with the people (correctly) pointing out that he's a lying hypocrite. Interesting take, I guess.
I am. You saying that he's "falling into the trap" implies that it's something that hasn't happened yet or is only just beginning to happen, rather than something that already happened years ago. This isn't a deep psychological dive on my part. Musk wears his insecurities and his desperate need to be praised and seen as cool on his sleeve, and anyone can confirm it for themselves by looking at Musk's Twitter feed, which is mostly him sharing high-fives with bottom-feeding right-wing grifters.
It's safe to say, however, that pre-Musk Twitter did not have an similar figure at the top regularly making unilateral decisions about who to ban and what new rules to suddenly invent, and therefore can't meaningfully be seen as equivalent.
Sorry, are you conceding that Musk doesn't actually care about free speech, and that his big justification for what he's doing to Twitter is complete bullshit? That's what this post seems to imply. I mean, it's fantastic if you are, because it'll save us some time. Musk himself and his thousands of devoted fans are still pretending that he's being totally neutral and objective.
You clearly don't know anything about Musk if you think that this is anything new for him. He's been desperate for popularity for years.
If you don't like it, start your own social network, sweaty.
There is no conflict between recognizing that Musk has the legal right to ban anyone he wants to and also that he's a huge hypocrite for disregarding his previous assertions that only outright illegal speech would be banned.
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/12/16/what-student-loan-borrowers-need-to-know-about-the-payment-pause.html
Soon we will find out if the American taxpayer will be forced to give me thousands of dollars to pay off loans I took out or if they'll get away with selfishly using that money for something else, like Medicare or roads.
Yes. Only billionaires may be bailed out of debt. This is the way.