You are the one claiming that NASA really did not care whether lunar dust, with then-unknown properties, gets into the exterior hull and onto all of the electronics, and that a flimsily held together external hull with lots of gaps is just great for going to the the lunar surface. I'm not really sure how much dumber the denial can get.
I never said that, ever. Tom, stop making up things, including your so-called understanding of the structural integrity of the LM. To repeat, you clearly didn't read or study anything about it.
No where have you seen me claim NASA didn't care. This thread is plastered with you claiming that the exterior hull isn't properly sealed, and that the "external hull" which again and again is the insulation blankets you're referring to, resemble the quality of a child's design cunning.
Now you're also making ignorant assumptions about how the electronics were exposed. Can you see where I'm going with this, Tom? As mentioned earlier, do you not see the irony in the fact that we have electronics with sensitive sensors surviving conditions of high salinity, hurricanes and atmospheric wear and tear on buoy weather stations, while dismissing the possibility of the LMs construction surviving a mere 16% of earth's gravity in an environment with no salinity, no atmosphere, no winds?
You are questioning the wrong events, Tom, and you're doing in the most ignorant possible manner.