Re: This wiki entry though......
« Reply #40 on: February 12, 2017, 08:53:48 PM »
Besides, it doesn't state the heat shielding was the external hull, only that the photo is before it was added. Are you not reading it, Tom?
Ignored by Intikam since 2016.

Re: This wiki entry though......
« Reply #41 on: February 12, 2017, 10:11:31 PM »
Sure, sure, the real space ship is underneath the poorly crafted space ship.

no, the real hull of the lunar lander is underneath some insulation to keep it from getting direct sunlight.  as has been explained to you many times before, no one except for you is claiming that nasa built a lunar lander entirely out of paper. 

shitposting leftists are never alone

*

Offline markjo

  • *
  • Posts: 2607
  • Zetetic Council runner-up
    • View Profile
Re: This wiki entry though......
« Reply #42 on: February 13, 2017, 01:16:48 AM »
Why would a space agency hold pieces of its lunar lander together with tape?
Just as an FYI, NASA did not design or build the Lunar Module.  Grumman Aircraft did.
Abandon hope all ye who press enter here.

Offline Rekt

  • *
  • Posts: 150
    • View Profile
Re: This wiki entry though......
« Reply #43 on: February 13, 2017, 02:02:15 PM »
Why would a space agency hold pieces of its lunar lander together with tape?
Just as an FYI, NASA did not design or build the Lunar Module.  Grumman Aircraft did.
But, however, they don't understand the contractor system of NASA's operations. For example, their "Muh scotch tape use" argument is completely invalid, as Scotch was chosen as a CONTRACTOR to create SPECIFIC TYPES of tape for use in the Lunar Module, due to their industry prevalence and experience. Why would an aircraft company build a spacecraft? Because NASA contracts are a lot of fucking money.

Re: This wiki entry though......
« Reply #44 on: February 14, 2017, 04:49:48 PM »
The moon landing wasn't real. The technology didn't exist and it still doesn't exist.

Offline Rekt

  • *
  • Posts: 150
    • View Profile
Re: This wiki entry though......
« Reply #45 on: February 14, 2017, 05:49:55 PM »
The moon landing wasn't real. The technology didn't exist and it still doesn't exist.
Any proof of this?

Re: This wiki entry though......
« Reply #46 on: February 14, 2017, 06:20:21 PM »
The moon landing wasn't real. The technology didn't exist and it still doesn't exist.
Any proof of this?

Any proof it is? Besides the fake moon rocks that we gave people after we came back?

Re: This wiki entry though......
« Reply #47 on: February 14, 2017, 08:05:01 PM »
The moon landing wasn't real. The technology didn't exist and it still doesn't exist.
Any proof of this?

Any proof it is? Besides the fake moon rocks that we gave people after we came back?

You realize that there are many that aren't fake, right?

FYI, your link is broken.

Re: This wiki entry though......
« Reply #48 on: February 14, 2017, 09:01:33 PM »
The moon landing wasn't real. The technology didn't exist and it still doesn't exist.
Any proof of this?

Any proof it is? Besides the fake moon rocks that we gave people after we came back?

You realize that there are many that aren't fake, right?

FYI, your link is broken.

Where are they housed and have they been independently verified as being authentic?

I appreciate your attention to detail in fixing my broken link in your quote by the way

Re: This wiki entry though......
« Reply #49 on: February 14, 2017, 09:24:12 PM »
The moon landing wasn't real. The technology didn't exist and it still doesn't exist.
Any proof of this?

Any proof it is? Besides the fake moon rocks that we gave people after we came back?

You realize that there are many that aren't fake, right?

FYI, your link is broken.

Where are they housed and have they been independently verified as being authentic?

I appreciate your attention to detail in fixing my broken link in your quote by the way

I don't know. But there are many scattered all over the world, many of which end up in national museums. I would think that people would start to notice if they were all fake. The discovery of a single fake 40 years later isn't very compelling evidence that the entire program was faked.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_rock
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_and_missing_moon_rocks

Re: This wiki entry though......
« Reply #50 on: February 14, 2017, 09:44:30 PM »
The moon landing wasn't real. The technology didn't exist and it still doesn't exist.
Any proof of this?

Any proof it is? Besides the fake moon rocks that we gave people after we came back?

You realize that there are many that aren't fake, right?

FYI, your link is broken.

Where are they housed and have they been independently verified as being authentic?

I appreciate your attention to detail in fixing my broken link in your quote by the way

I don't know. But there are many scattered all over the world, many of which end up in national museums. I would think that people would start to notice if they were all fake. The discovery of a single fake 40 years later isn't very compelling evidence that the entire program was faked.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_rock
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_and_missing_moon_rocks

What other tangible, physical proof do we have that human's actually set foot on the moon?

Re: This wiki entry though......
« Reply #51 on: February 14, 2017, 09:58:56 PM »
The moon landing wasn't real. The technology didn't exist and it still doesn't exist.
Any proof of this?

Any proof it is? Besides the fake moon rocks that we gave people after we came back?

You realize that there are many that aren't fake, right?

FYI, your link is broken.

Where are they housed and have they been independently verified as being authentic?

I appreciate your attention to detail in fixing my broken link in your quote by the way

I don't know. But there are many scattered all over the world, many of which end up in national museums. I would think that people would start to notice if they were all fake. The discovery of a single fake 40 years later isn't very compelling evidence that the entire program was faked.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_rock
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_and_missing_moon_rocks

What other tangible, physical proof do we have that human's actually set foot on the moon?

Here is a good place to start.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings

I haven't combed through the evidence personally, since I've never seen a compelling reason to doubt the moon landings in the first place. I've certainly seen a lot of claims of evidence that the moon landings are fake, but every time I look closer, it always ends up being people like Tom Bishop making arguments based on personal incredulity regarding topics that they know next to nothing about.

Re: This wiki entry though......
« Reply #52 on: February 14, 2017, 10:03:24 PM »
http://legacy.jefferson.kctcs.edu/observatory/apollo11/

i find baysinger's recordings extremely compelling
shitposting leftists are never alone

Offline Rekt

  • *
  • Posts: 150
    • View Profile
Re: This wiki entry though......
« Reply #53 on: February 15, 2017, 01:41:16 PM »
http://legacy.jefferson.kctcs.edu/observatory/apollo11/

i find baysinger's recordings extremely compelling
Simply amazing. I love it when someone determined does something this cool. Great evidence, I'll be adding this to my collection.

Offline Rekt

  • *
  • Posts: 150
    • View Profile
Re: This wiki entry though......
« Reply #54 on: April 06, 2017, 12:29:55 PM »
Could you at least point us to the part that looks like it is "loosely held together"? I honestly have no idea what part you are talking about.

The general answer is this: making something air tight is more time consuming, heavier, and costlier than not making it air tight. If there is no reason to make it air tight, then they aren't going to bother. Electronics don't need an airtight compartment.

You are aware that when the craft landed it allegedly made large clouds of lunar dust that went everywhere. Are you telling me that NASA didn't really care about the then unknown properties of the lunar dust getting into the many gaps in the exterior hull, and onto all of the electronics?
We had sent several landers to the moon before this, the Surveyor series.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveyor_program
Gave us a pretty good idea of the properties of the moon.