The one-pole model fails to explain why the Sun appears to the south inside the Antarctic Circle in the South's summer, for example.
4) ...I'm not sure what you're trying to say about the unipolar model. The sun would certainly appear to be in the general vicinity of Antarctica during the Southern winter.
Okay, I can simply the explanation for you. The "unipolar model" does not explain the direction you would obverse the Sun when you stand at 0o 98o S at 00.00 UTC on January 1 of any year. Indeed for all observers inside the Antarctic Circle throughout summer the Sun appears to circle above the horizon.
[video removed for the sake of space]
Oh, and the video is filmed at the South Pole further evidence of the failure of the "unipolar model".
The appearance of the midnight sun (and its opposite) is the result of Aetheric eyewalls, which distort and hide the sun in predictable patterns.
As you've said, this thread is not about the Aether. If you'd like to discuss that outlandish claim, please start a new thread and I'll ask you to provide your data there.
Also, you did not counter the point that the film was made at the South Pole. Should we assume that you now accept its existence?
By the way, your post is a great example of the "special pleading" fallacy.
Why are you so angry? Are you CT's alt or something?
First of all, sun should not be capitalized. That correction was unnecessary and incorrect. Generally accepted stylistics is that Sol, the proper name for the sun, should be capitalized but sun should not. The same goes for Luna and the moon.
Second, I merely answered the question proposed to me. I've gone out of my way to avoid getting into the details of Aetheric Theory, because this is neither the time nor the place. Also, I'm doing a frankly ridiculous amount of homework for my classes right now and don't have time to put into a proper response. Like I said, if you want me to go into detail I'll be happy to, just start a separate thread for it.
No, I do not accept that the video was taken at the South Pole. However, such discussions are more the area of Tom and Thork. I'm far more interested in the physical mechanics of the Flat Earth and have no desire to consider why or how some are deluded into believing that Amundsen-Scott is at the South Pole.
Finally, I am not guilty of special pleading.