1
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: August 28, 2025, 10:27:27 AM »
I fail to see how Trump telling Bondi to release everything is setting her up for failure.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Bill Clinton didn't go to the Supreme Court looking for unlimited criminal immunity for the sitting President.Correct.
You truly think they are not the best of buds?
Why is Trump protecting Clinton?
GOT 'EM!The absolute incompetence and utter stupidity of the Trump administration are the only things protecting us from its unrepentant greed and corruption.
https://www.npr.org/2025/08/16/nx-s1-5504196/trump-putin-summit-documents-left-behind
Why the fuck would they print anything confidential on a hotel printer?!
What, did they hook their laptops up to the wifi?
QuoteHe also pled the 5th on almost every questionHe seemed happy enough to answer the question about whether they socialised.
Yes, although I am not sure where you garner Trump has engaged in sexual acts while at the workplace.So Trump is a totalitarian, by your logic?Claiming acts of driving and tax payments are somehow analogous to acts of banging an intern at the office
That's not what I said...
No, that is exactly what you said.
One can only take that you were placing yourself in Clinton's shoes by stating whether your driving habits or an honest or dishonest filing of taxes was a gauge of your political idealogy. First of all, you are nothing at all similar to Clinton in terms of position, power, or fame. B, nobody gives flying fuck what you do.
Those two acts have nothing to fucking do with the goddamn workplace and your introduction of them is typical of the fucking bullshit you post.
Engaging in sexual acts in the workplace, especially when one is in a clear position of power over the other, is a totalitarian act.
Claiming acts of driving and tax payments are somehow analogous to acts of banging an intern at the office
That's not what I said...
Plenty of steps taken that were certainly not centrist.Well, maybe. So give examples of those then.
Banging an intern isn’t one of them.
Your lack of knowledge concerning the actions of the Clinton administration is not helping at all.Clintons are "centrist."Whether they are or not, the weird thing is you seem to be evidencing your position that they aren't by the fact Clinton had an affair with an intern.
What a fucking joke of a take.
"He cant be centrist! He got a blow job in the oval office!".
What the hell are you talking about? How are those two things linked?
Try "He can't be a centrist, he did <insert non-centrist policy he implemented here>"