91
Recent Posts
92
Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)
« Last post by Lord Dave on September 18, 2023, 07:10:50 AM »Imagine calling coordinated mass murder "bad logistics".Imagine assuming it was coordinated mass murder and not just someone fucking up badly without evidence of intent to comit mass murder.
93
Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)
« Last post by Dual1ty on September 18, 2023, 07:03:31 AM »Imagine calling coordinated mass murder "bad logistics".
94
Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)
« Last post by Lord Dave on September 18, 2023, 06:40:36 AM »Yeah, heard the roadblocks caused a lot of issues and got people killed.
Thats bad logistics, pure and simple. And in a place with fires and volcanos, you'd think they'd have a better plan in place.
Thats bad logistics, pure and simple. And in a place with fires and volcanos, you'd think they'd have a better plan in place.
95
Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)
« Last post by Dual1ty on September 17, 2023, 09:26:14 PM »Cop-assisted mass murder.
Yep. That's what happens when you're just an order-following robot.
I have no respect for those PIGS!
People should've floored it out of there despite the police roadblocks.
What a bunch of sheep.
Then again, they didn't get killed by a wildfire.
Still, the ones who made it out are the ones who didn't just stand still waiting for their slaughter. Fact.
Yep. That's what happens when you're just an order-following robot.
I have no respect for those PIGS!
People should've floored it out of there despite the police roadblocks.
What a bunch of sheep.
Then again, they didn't get killed by a wildfire.
Still, the ones who made it out are the ones who didn't just stand still waiting for their slaughter. Fact.
96
Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)
« Last post by Lord Dave on September 17, 2023, 09:09:20 PM »So... if I disagree with a video and pick apart its analysis, I'm not thinking for myself? Just making sure I understand where you stand on what "thinking for yourself" means. If I had simply agreed with the video without asking questions excpt those presented in the video, would that be "thinking for myself"?When you post something, especially without comment, it is understood to be something you support. If you post a video but do not agree with its content, you should say so.
Is that so?
All the videos I post are food for thought for those who are actually capable of thinking for themselves (not my fault that this is hard for you). Not to mention that it's all pieces of a larger puzzle because no one knows exactly what happened and hence using your brain and using discernment are obviously required.
Your interpretation that I "support" everything the videos say is utter garbage just like pretty much everything you post. And your opinion that I should announce what I personally agree or don't agree with irrelevant.
I am not trying to misrepresent what you say, only to decipher it. So if not in orbit, where is this weapon you are referring too and in what way does it or even might it (electrically as you say) use the power of a hurricane?
Yeah, sure... go decipher why you believe any narratives from government or MSM or "fact-checkers" even if they don't make physical sense.
Now you're asking me for the location of the murder weapon as if I am the one who did the murder. You make so much sense as always. Next you're gonna ask me to describe exactly how it operates. You're already doing it. What a genius you are.
If you must know where I stand TODAY, right now regarding the "CCP NORAD" satellites (and this is for anyone reading this, not just you because I don't care to explain anything to you) - In my opinion, the satellites probably have something to do with those specific fires (they probably were capable of igniting small local vegetation fires that spread further due to high winds and dry conditions), but nothing to do with houses and people literally getting "dustified" and nothing to do with the many anomalies such as liquified rims all over the place next to intact asphalt (which is intact all over the place too) that make it obvious to anyone who isn't a complete idiot that no wildfire caused the resulting destruction. I could name anomalies all day AND provide evidence for said anomalies because unlike you I actually do research before opening my mouth - that's the difference between me and you who are here just to bust my balls and is happy to believe any "nothing to see here" narratives.
Why would the tar and asphalt being intact be odd?
What, exactly, do you think would happen when hit with the intense heat of a wildfire then cooled once the fire ends?
97
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden
« Last post by Lord Dave on September 17, 2023, 09:01:26 PM »Indeed. But regardless of his skills or ideas, he will be drowned out by the name Donald Trump in the media.But you are forgetting something: Brand recognition. I've never heard if Vivek. And if I know nothing about him, why would I vote for him? How would he even get on the ballot?
I couldn't find the rules with a quick google but I think he needs a certain percentage in the polls to be on the primary ballot.
So if he isn't a household name, few who votes in the primary is gonna vote for him.
You have to gain some organic momentum first and get a number of signatures and show of support. As a rising star you attend party conventions and are eligible to participate in the presidential debates.
Vivek met all of that and is one of the contenders in the televised mainstream debates, and has already participated in one GOP presidential debate. He went from zero point zero in the polls to ranking about third place, neck-in-neck and just above Mike Pence and Nikki Hailey. There will be more debates and the lowest people will be cast off the island until there is one remaining winner who typically becomes the GOP presidential nominee.
98
Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)
« Last post by Dual1ty on September 17, 2023, 06:46:52 PM »I am not trying to misrepresent what you say, only to decipher it. So if not in orbit, where is this weapon you are referring too and in what way does it or even might it (electrically as you say) use the power of a hurricane?
Yeah, sure... go decipher why you believe any narratives from government or MSM or "fact-checkers" even if they don't make physical sense.
Now you're asking me for the location of the murder weapon as if I am the one who did the murder. You make so much sense as always. Next you're gonna ask me to describe exactly how it operates. You're already doing it. What a genius you are.
If you must know where I stand TODAY, right now regarding the "CCP NORAD" satellites (and this is for anyone reading this, not just you because I don't care to explain anything to you) - In my opinion, the satellites probably have something to do with those specific fires (they probably were capable of igniting small local vegetation fires that spread further due to high winds and dry conditions), but nothing to do with houses and people literally getting "dustified" and nothing to do with the many anomalies such as liquified rims all over the place next to intact asphalt (which is intact all over the place too) that make it obvious to anyone who isn't a complete idiot that no wildfire caused the resulting destruction. I could name anomalies all day AND provide evidence for said anomalies because unlike you I actually do research before opening my mouth - that's the difference between me and you who are here just to bust my balls and is happy to believe any "nothing to see here" narratives.
99
Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)
« Last post by ichoosereality on September 17, 2023, 06:37:35 PM »I am not trying to misrepresent what you say, only to decipher it. So if not in orbit, where is this weapon you are referring too and in what way does it or even might it (electrically as you say) use the power of a hurricane?re the timeline of the fires, the video you present makes very precise claims, like "the Olinda fire was ignited at approximately 10:47pm August 7th". But the reports I find like this one
https://www.mauicounty.gov/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=12621
only sayQuoteShortly after midnight this morning, a brush fire was reported in the Olinda Road area of Kula. Residents in the Auli’i Drive area were evacuated at 3:45 a.m. At 4:50 a.m. residents of Hanamu Road were also evacuated. Firefighter crews from Kula, Makawao, Kahului, and Wailea are on scene. The Fire Department’s Air One helicopter was launched at daybreak to conduct aerial assessment of the fire.So could it have started at 10:47pm? sure, but we do not know that as far as I can tell. Claiming things that precisely match a particular scenario but are not established facts is a classic misinformation technique.
Well, you would find the source of those claimed timings if you actually did your research instead of trying to misrepresent my claims with "weapons in orbit" when I never talked about weapons in orbit in my entire life. And I also never said that the hurricane "powers the weapon", just that the weapon utilizes the power of the hurricane in some way, which is completely different. So I would appreciate if you don't keep trying to misrepresent what I say.
100
Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)
« Last post by Dual1ty on September 17, 2023, 06:07:15 PM »re the timeline of the fires, the video you present makes very precise claims, like "the Olinda fire was ignited at approximately 10:47pm August 7th". But the reports I find like this one
https://www.mauicounty.gov/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=12621
only sayQuoteShortly after midnight this morning, a brush fire was reported in the Olinda Road area of Kula. Residents in the Auli’i Drive area were evacuated at 3:45 a.m. At 4:50 a.m. residents of Hanamu Road were also evacuated. Firefighter crews from Kula, Makawao, Kahului, and Wailea are on scene. The Fire Department’s Air One helicopter was launched at daybreak to conduct aerial assessment of the fire.So could it have started at 10:47pm? sure, but we do not know that as far as I can tell. Claiming things that precisely match a particular scenario but are not established facts is a classic misinformation technique.
Well, you would find the source of those claimed timings if you actually did your research instead of trying to misrepresent my claims with "weapons in orbit" when I never talked about weapons in orbit in my entire life. And I also never said that the hurricane "powers the weapon", just that the weapon utilizes the power of the hurricane in some way, which is completely different. So I would appreciate if you don't keep trying to misrepresent what I say.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/lahaina-residents-say-police-barricades-prevented-people-from-fleeing-raging-fires-5483563
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-did-maui-fire-start-cause-lahaina-hawaii-wildfire/
https://www.facebook.com/countyofmaui/posts/671173878373895/