Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - honk

Pages: < Back  1 ... 46 47 [48] 49 50 ... 91  Next >
941
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Just Watched
« on: May 27, 2020, 11:57:44 PM »
My own hot take on the MCU, as I've mentioned before on IRC, is that they've begun to drown on their own continuity and endless fanservice. Both Spidey movies, and to a slightly lesser extent, Captain Marvel, neglected telling strong, standalone stories in favor of cramming in as many superfluous references to the previous films as possible. Those movies could not exist in their current state without the prior existence of the MCU, and that's not a good thing. The shared universe can be a fun little bonus, but it's not a crutch, and audiences will eventually grow tired of it if the movies keep using it like one.

942
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: May 27, 2020, 05:50:14 PM »
Yeah, I think it would be better for everyone if we just stopped engaging him. In other news:

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/27/politics/donald-trump-twitter-threat-regulate/index.html

haha Trump is mad

943
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Sleepy Joe 2020
« on: May 27, 2020, 03:33:41 AM »
I took the time to look at the article and here are my takes:

You know, you could save a lot of time by just saying that you agree with everything Trump says as a general rule. You like to make yourself out as a skeptic who's wary of both sides, but you're really just another Trump fanboy.

Skunks cannot smell their own stink...that's a fact.

No, it's not. I would make my case further, but there isn't much point in doing that without even a counterargument to respond to. No politician in recent times has been beloved by assholes to the degree that Trump has, nor have they courted them to the degree that Trump has.

944
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Sleepy Joe 2020
« on: May 24, 2020, 11:27:20 PM »
A significant chunk of them are, as some casual browsing of online pro-Trump communities very quickly reveals.

Feel free to point out that casual browsing and the 'significant chunk' of people who simultaneously profess hating Jews while loving Trump. I feel as though you're going to have a harder time dredging up those overlapping beliefs than you seem to think you will.

Ah, I see what you're doing. I'll give you a link, and then you'll say, "Now where does the author simultaneously profess to hate Jews yet love Trump? I see he's posted that picture of the greedy Jew rubbing his hands, but that doesn't mean he hates Jews." donut/walnut/yawn. More generally, though, anti-Semitism and pro-Trump fervor are widespread on the chans and Voat, very popular websites with thousands of users. You might think it's low-hanging fruit to point to fringe websites, but I think what makes it justified is how entirely unique it is to Trump. It didn't happen with previous presidents, at least not for many decades. There were no large communities of absolutely garbage, toxic people who loved Obama, Clinton, either Bush, or Reagan who were upfront about their awful character and their political enthusiasm. There's something about Trump that attracts the attention and excitement of bullies, racists, bigots, misogynists, and those who are generally just bad people. Antisemites are among those fans, Trump knows it, and he occasionally makes deliberate efforts to cater to them. It's why he said this dumb thing about Jews being disloyal if they didn't vote for him. It's why he couldn't bring himself to wholly, unambiguously condemn the racists and antisemites who ended up killing a woman while demonstrating their hatred in Charlottesville without weakly fumbling about with "both sides" and "very fine people." And it's absolutely why Trump bizarrely made a point of stressing that Henry Ford had "good bloodlines" (a phrase I guarantee Trump had never uttered before) just recently.

Quote
Trump never said they were disloyal to their race, either. Why are you so desperate to make this equivalence that doesn't exist? Did you read an article on Kotaku about it?

I am through with quibbling about what's technically a race, what's technically an ethnicity, what's technically a subculture, and all that shit. It doesn't matter. It doesn't change a single thing about the sentiments of what Trump expressed and the sentiments that I am expressing. It was a mistake for me to ever engage you on that stupid subject, and it's not going to happen again.

Quote
You're claiming all of a 'significant chunk' all hold the same dumb belief you applied to them, Saddam. In other words, you're treating some huge group of people as a monolith, exactly what I was chastising you on.

If you're not going to argue seriously, then don't bother arguing at all. And get the fuck out of here with your "chastising" bullshit, like you're some kind of authority figure. There are times when I doubt that you're even a real Trump supporter at all, as your main interest in him seems to be jokes and memes.

945
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Sleepy Joe 2020
« on: May 24, 2020, 05:40:57 PM »
The anti-Jewish pro-right segment hates Trump precisely for his connection to Judaism. Trump's base isn't anti-Jewish, that's just something you've entirely made up in the realm of your own mind.

A significant chunk of them are, as some casual browsing of online pro-Trump communities very quickly reveals.

Quote
Trump is also right, Jews that typically dislike Israel do vote democratic. However, they "ain't Jews" never came out of Trump's mouth, so no, Trump hasn't said anything like Joe Biden has said.

I said it was essentially the same, not literally the same. They were equally stupid, equally presumptive, and equally "problematic." If their statements had been reversed - if Biden had said that blacks considering not voting for him were being disloyal to their race, and Trump had said that Jews not supporting him "ain't Jews," you would be defending Trump and mocking Biden.

Quote
Overall, Saddam, you're once again grasping at straws and embarrassing yourself with your own thorough lack of critical thinking in regards to politics. Stop treating entire groups of people like monolithic blocks who all hold exactly the same beliefs. Yes, I know it's easier on your brain, but it's dumb and you know it.

What's dumb is you reading a post where I used the term "a significant chunk," and apparently interpreting that to mean "all of them." I know you have better reading comprehension than that.

946
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Sleepy Joe 2020
« on: May 24, 2020, 03:46:56 PM »
Trump has said essentially that, just with Jewish people instead of black people:

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/jews-disloyal-people-israel-vote-democratic-trump/story?id=65095538

It's interesting that a significant chunk of Trump's base are vociferously anti-Jewish, but they never seem to hold Trump's deference to Israel against him.

947
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: May 23, 2020, 04:20:34 PM »
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/white-house-remains-mum-questions-about-trump-s-annual-physical-n1213266

Makes you thonk.

Really, who's going to make the president complete their physical every year? It's not required by law, and even if it were, Trump could still just ignore it to the cheers of his fans and the quiet acceptance of the Republicans in Congress. Maybe he'll just say, "Believe me, I'm 6'4 and 220 lbs, all of it muscle. I'm in perfect health, tremendous health, way better than Obama, spectacular health," and his fans will go wild.

948
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: May 21, 2020, 06:32:21 PM »
https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/21/politics/john-ratcliffe-confirmation-vote/index.html

Ratcliffe is a partisan hack who caters to conspiracy theorists and has no real qualifications or experience in this field. But that doesn't matter to Trump, who's only interested in having a yes-man who'll kiss his ass and publicly say all the things he wants to hear.

949
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Superhero Movies & Comics General
« on: May 20, 2020, 09:21:29 PM »
04/05: If you really hate Margot Robbie's portrayal of Harley, then it's safe to say you won't like the movie. I found her to be...okay. She's improved from SS, and is at least dressed much better, but Robbie's line delivery grates on me. It's like she's trying to squeeze every bit of sass and attitude she can into every line she says, and then her dialogue ends up being drowned out by the subtext of just how full of sass and attitude she is. Her stupid Three Stooges accent doesn't help. The other characters are much better, except for "Cassandra Cain," who has absolutely nothing to do with the Cassandra from the source material beyond being an Asian girl. And like I said, the action is great. Oh, and I can honestly say that even the most hardcore right-wing/anti-SJW critic would have a very tough time trying to point to any insidious anti-men material here or whatever the fuck they imagine is in the movie. Hell, the animated Harley show is far more pointed and direct in its commentary on gender politics and toxic relationships, and that show has, as far as I can tell, notably not drawn any right-wing/anti-SJW backlash. Go figure.

...

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/justice-league-snyder-cut-plans-revealed-it-will-be-an-new-thing-1295102

Holy shit, the Snyder cut really is going to happen! And I was so confident that it wouldn't! In my defense, I don't think this is a particularly good business decision, and that rabid enthusiasm from a vocal minority doesn't always translate into IRL success. And contrary to the narrative that many people in the movement promoted, the Snyder cut is not essentially complete, and still needs a lot more time and money before it's in a presentable state. Still, at least they're finally getting what they want, and of course I'll check out the finished product. Will it be any good? Probably not, but it'll at least be far more interesting than the Z-grade filler Whedon crammed the original with. And the terrible, terrible quips.

950
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: May 20, 2020, 04:06:34 PM »
No, I don't. That's my whole point. The media shouldn't be reporting a notorious liar's claim that he probably made up on the spot as fact, and they absolutely shouldn't be abandoning a real story concerning a real scandal to do so.

951
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: May 20, 2020, 03:27:06 PM »
There's no evidence beyond the word of a notorious liar and a compromised doctor that Trump is actually taking hydroxychloroquine.

952
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: May 20, 2020, 03:42:00 AM »
Well, I can see from the state of this thread, as well as the current media cycle, that Trump's distraction from the systematic removal of any investigators who dare turn an eye of suspicion towards him or his cronies has worked very well.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/18/us/politics/pompeo-trump-linick-inspector-general-firing.html

This is the real story, the one that Trump wants to be quickly buried, and the media are doing an excellent job of obliging him by reporting breathlessly on how Trump takes hydroxychloroquine instead. This part of the article is arguably the most telling:

Quote
Mr. Trump, speaking about the latest in his series of firings of inspectors general around the government, said on Monday of Mr. Linick: “I don’t know him. Never heard of him. But I was asked by the State Department, by Mike” to terminate Mr. Linick.

Trump is already laying the groundwork to stab Pompeo in the back and blame everything on him. That's the kind of person he is, and it shows why he's fundamentally unsuited for any leadership position. The buck doesn't stop with Trump. He refuses to take responsibility for anything, unless it's something he's comfortable gloating about. There's always an excuse with him. Always an escape hatch. Always someone else to blame. Trump may abuse the powers of his office to protect cronies like Pompeo and Flynn from time to time, but ultimately, his only loyalty is to himself, and if he felt pressured enough - or even just not flattered or praised enough - he would betray Pompeo and throw him the wolves in a heartbeat. Trump lives in a Trump-centric world where other people are pawns to be exploited, abused, and discarded at whatever moment he decides would be most personally profitable for him.

And as hypocritical as it is for me after all that to then weigh in on the hydroxychloroquine story, I think it needs to be pointed out that even if Trump's doctor came out and explicitly said, "Yes, I prescribed President Trump hydroxychloroquine," we shouldn't believe him. He's been compromised. I can only assume that Trump has threatened to fire him if he gives honest assessments of his health instead of just saying what he wants to hear, and that's why we've been told that an obese slug in his seventies who never exercises and mostly eats garbage is actually in really good physical health, as well as mysteriously a couple of inches taller than what all available photographic evidence suggests his height really is. There's no reason to believe he'd be any more honest about this.

953
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Vote Bernie Out In 2024
« on: May 17, 2020, 07:14:14 PM »
Quit trying to undermine my wokeness, junker. Thork was clearly bringing up Palin to brag about how hot she supposedly is, and it was a perfectly relevant response to shoot that idea down. You're the only one talking about penises.

954
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Vote Bernie Out In 2024
« on: May 17, 2020, 03:21:12 PM »
I don't find Sarah Palin attractive at all, and have always been mystified by the insistence among conservatives that she's totally gorgeous. She's just an average-looking middle-aged woman.

I watched Wyden and Daines both try and rally the senate to vote for their amendment. It was a no-brainer. And I can't imagine a single incumbent senator would have faced any backlash from their actual constituents. It is infuriating that something like this didn't go through. It should have been unanimous.

I think it might be a generational thing. Most members of Congress didn't grow up with the Internet, and a significant chunk of them are no doubt entirely tech illiterate. They probably don't understand how intrusive it is to be snooping around people's Internet history, or what that even means.

955
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Vote Bernie Out In 2024
« on: May 16, 2020, 05:54:48 PM »
Upon further research, I have discovered that proxy voting in the Senate is only allowed during committee votes, not floor votes:

https://bipartisanpolicy.org/blog/explainer-proxy-voting-in-congress/

So much for that. Still, he should have been there.

956
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: May 16, 2020, 05:38:40 PM »

957
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Vote Bernie Out In 2024
« on: May 16, 2020, 02:46:33 PM »
He could have asked another senator to help him vote by proxy if he was sick or otherwise unable to attend the vote. Unless they're deliberately recusing themselves, there's no excuse for members of Congress to be missing votes like this. This is literally their job.

958
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Now Playing (the Video Game Version)
« on: May 15, 2020, 08:09:29 PM »
Planescape: Torment

This is another game that begins well, and then just kind of drops the ball near the end. For the first two thirds or so of this game, I was hooked. It feels in many ways like a deliberate aversion of most of the common tropes of fantasy and CRPGs of the time. Instead of a sprawling world map you're meant to traverse, the action is mostly kept confined to a single city. Instead of elves and hobbits and other generic fantasy nonsense, almost everyone you meet is human, undead, or some variation of demon. Instead of drowning you in random enemy encounters and intricate party management, the game emphasizes exploration and dialogue. The story is intriguing and compelling, the characters are memorable, the dialogue is smart and even funny at times, and what I especially love is the setting. The city of Sigil is this weird, beautiful, disturbing metropolis that's part industrial, part Gothic, and all insanity. It's brimming with color and personality, and everywhere you turn there are unique characters with dialogue trees to be exhausted and quests to be completed.

And then you get to the final act, where you have to leave Sigil, and all of a sudden the game becomes linear and focuses mostly on combat. I don't want to exaggerate the drop in quality too much, as it's certainly nowhere near as drastic as it was for, say, RDR 2 or FF XV, but some of the magic is definitely gone. The combat is very simplistic, and not a lot of fun when it's all you're doing. With precious few weapons and no real armor, there's very little you can do to properly outfit yourself and your party, and more importantly, the mechanics are all off. Every action is mapped to the left mouse button, leaving the game constantly confused about whether you're moving to a spot or attacking an enemy there. Characters will spend several seconds scrambling to get into position to attack, only to find that the enemy has moved. Characters will stand around doing nothing while their party members come under attack. It's a mess, but it wouldn't really be a problem if not for the fact that, like I said, the final act is mostly about combat and getting past enemies. It's annoying, but it's not enough to stop this game from being well worth it for CRPG fans.

Disco Elysium

Without wasting words, this game is terrific, and easily one of the best RPGs I've ever played. Its influences include the aforementioned Planescape: Torment, The Wire, and the art of Francis Bacon and Hieronymous Bosch, and yet the finished product feels entirely original. You play as a washed-up detective who awakens after a lengthy bender with no memory of who he is or what he's doing, only to discover that there's a murder he needs to solve and a struggle between local factions that's threatening to turn violent at any moment. What sets this game apart from most amnesiac-hero setups is that the emphasis is less on remembering the biographical details of your life, and more on shaping your personality and general approach to police work. And what a personality you'll end up with! The option to play things entirely straight and try to be as boring as possible is there for you, but you're cheating yourself if you don't take advantage of the wacky dialogue choices. This game wants you to be eccentric, and it's a far more effective playstyle. It's also funnier. This game has some very dark, tragic moments, but for the most part it's hilarious.

With no real combat system, gameplay is mainly you running around the neighborhood talking to people and examining objects. Even more so than Planescape, the setting is densely packed with possible interactions at every corner, all of them with numerous passive and active skill checks. Speaking of which, the skill system is great. Some of the skills are pretty standard for an RPG, like perception or endurance, but others are a little more unusual. For example, Visual Calculus lets you mentally reconstruct crime scenes like you're Batman, helpful for tracking bullet trajectories or finding missing evidence. Inland Empire, on the other hand, is a borderline supernatural ability to sense danger and talk to dead bodies and inanimate objects. Amusingly, the observations you make with these skills are communicated to you in the form of dialogue, so the skills are all basically characters in their own right - ones that will chime in during interactions to offer their opinions and advice, and even argue with each other if they disagree on anything.

There's also a perk system in the form of "thoughts," where you either try to remember details of your life (how old you are, where you live, etc.) or think about a political or social belief that you hold, such as communism, fascism, racism, or feminism. After a few in-game hours, the thought will be "internalized," and you'll receive the effects of the thought. As much as I love the writing for these thoughts, I have to admit that it doesn't quite work as well as the skill system. There's no way to predict what effects any given thought will have, many of the thoughts are either useless or overall detrimental to you, while a select few are incredibly beneficial to the point of being overpowered, and it costs skill points to add and remove thoughts, so you can't be doing it all the time. I'd honestly advise new players to consult this handy guide, and personally recommend Jamais Vu (Derealization) and The Fifteenth Indotribe to maximize your experience and money, respectively.

That's really the closest thing this game has to a flaw. I can't recommend it enough.

959
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: May 14, 2020, 05:59:42 PM »
The article only hints at it, but the vagueness behind exactly what's being alleged is a key part of this faux-scandal's wide appeal among conservatives of all stripes, and I'm convinced it's a deliberate strategy. The exact same thing happened with the endless Benghazi "investigations." They keep everything nice and vague and everyone is free to imagine whatever horrible scandal they like behind it all. Mainstream Republicans can suppose that Obama quietly tried to sabotage Trump before leaving office, and Trump's more deranged fans can tie it to Pizzagate and QAnon.

960
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: May 12, 2020, 11:16:11 PM »
Yeah, I doubt there's anything obviously illegal in Trump's tax returns. It's just in his nature to lash out defensively, hatch cover-up schemes, and in general behave very suspiciously whenever he's under pressure. That doesn't prove he's a criminal.

Pages: < Back  1 ... 46 47 [48] 49 50 ... 91  Next >