Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Between two conscenting adults? Sometimes but that exists in every business as well so I'm not sure I'd call it a government policy if private sectors do it as well.It's a matter of politics, certainly, but not of policy.Yes, of course.
There are no government policies regarding sexual conduct in the workplace.
my french buddy, chip, let me know how to handle these things but it isnt really appropriate for the forum.
also page 666. nice.
So you went with the 'This was intentional and Trump is playing 4D chess' but with alot of maybe.
But since both Trump and Pam said they have the evidence, it's clear they were lying. You wouldn't say you have something then say you don't as a honeypot for the people on the list.
I couldn't find a direct promise by Trump to release the sex trafficking client list. I found this from 2024:
https://mynbc15.com/news/nation-world/trump-teases-releasing-epstein-client-list-if-elected-id-certainly-take-a-look-at-it-bill-clinton-jeffrey-prince-andrew-rfk-jr-island-plane-stephen-hawking-donald-election-2024-sex-trafficking“It’s just very strange for a lot of people that the list of clients that went to the island has not been made public,” Fridman said.
“Yeah, it’s very interesting, isn’t it?” Trump said.
“So if you’re able to, you’ll ---” Fridman began.
“Yeah, I’d certainly take a look at it,” Trump said.
Since Trump had access to everything as President, his specific wording matters. Trump doesn't say that he there is a specific client list of people who rented children from Epstein through sex trafficking that the government is withholding. There is list of people who went to the island that is being witheld. We already have a lot of those names who went to the island, which are hundreds of celebrities and rich people.
When the affair is taking place with an intern in the workplace, that most certainly is a matter of politics.
Trump is having an affair with an intern in the Oval Office?
What the fuck are you smoking?
LMMFAO!!!
Clinton a "centrist."
Explains the blow job (it is a perfectly acceptable policy to have sex relations with your intern) and Janet Reno (of Waco fame).
Again, what in the living fuck are you smoking?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm2m879neljo
Curious how Tom will spin this.
Official story?
Democrat edits?
Hillary Clinton?
Or will they finally start to question if Trump, who was president at the time, had a hand in it...
This has been happening for almost two decades now. Epstein was convicted for sex trafficking 19 years ago, and since then his list of associates was continually threatened to be released, but then somehow not released. At this point we can only hope that the wealthy clients are being snatched under seal in a massive honeypot of self incrimination.
It is suspect to me how a man who didn't even have a company website obtained hundreds of millions of dollars, giving credence to the claims that he was part of an covert operation designed to gather blackmail against the rich and powerful. If true, the system will never allow the details of this to be fully known and expose itself, no matter who is President.
Sadaam - "Clinton-era centrism..."
Getting blown by an intern while seated behind the desk in the Oval Office is a very "centrist" thing to do.
LMMFAO!
What does that have to do with his policies? Clinton ran as and governed as a centrist, and thirty years later, Democratic presidential candidates are doing the exact same thing.QuoteI also don't believe that Elon was ever especially liked or admired by the left.That explains all the Democrats in Chicago parading around in Teslas with bumper stickers declaring, "I bought this before Elon went crazy."
WTF you smoking, anyway!?!?
LMMFAO!!!
People once being willing to buy his cars without being judged hardly makes him some kind of hero or leader to the left. Think about it this way - if the head of, say, Ford, suddenly made the news for saying and doing a bunch of horrible things, you'd probably see a similar level of embarrassment among Ford owners and an eagerness to distance themselves from him. That wouldn't mean that the head of Ford was someone they had especially liked or admired before. As I've said, I've only ever heard that Elon used to be beloved by the left from conservatives. He's been heavily criticized by leftists for several years, long before he ever bought Twitter or publicly embraced Trump.
Sadaam - "Clinton-era centrism..."
Getting blown by an intern while seated behind the desk in the Oval Office is a very "centrist" thing to do.
LMMFAO!
what lessons are there to learn?
It's fairly absurd by any measure to claim that a billionaire is not a good businessman. Even the claim that he received a jumpstart through millions from his father just means that both Trump and his father are good business men.His father? Yes.
Sounds like obliterate means “cause a few months delay”
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c79qeqg89g2o
From the above PBS article:But the site was obliterated, according to Trump. Shouldn't have BEEN survivors. And if Israel just wanted to kill anyone who tried to assess damage just because they can... yeah, that's a war crime.QuoteThe Israeli military also confirmed it struck roads around Iran’s Fordo enrichment facility to obstruct access to the site.
They took out the roads to prevent emergency responders from trying to help people who may have been trapped or dying in the rubble. This is reprehensible, and likely a war crime. Attacking the survivors of a bombing is distinctly different than the bombing of the infrastructure itself.
But Trump said they did. Hit that site and obliterated it. Then Israel hits the same spot again.Oh hey, something we all missed.Or, maybe the US and other previous strikes didn’t take out every possible target.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/israel-hits-iranian-government-targets-day-after-u-s-strikes-on-iranian-nuclear-sites
Apparently, Israel wanted to attack an already obliterated site. Weird, right? Almost like Trump is lying about how much damage was done. Probably why he's blocking congress from seeing the reports.
Before too long, they might have to start letting the illegals in again so that they have someone to deport.
The Trump administration has set a goal of 3,000 immigration arrests per day, or one million per year, claiming that it is targeting violent criminals. ICE data obtained by the Cato Institute show that over 93 percent of immigrants arrested this fiscal year were never convicted of any violent offenses.
