1

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: Today at 05:33:41 PM »

Maybe next you could work out the difference between the article's 186 and the actual real data from the source of 1097. Looking forward to your results.

Maybe next time, you could actually point out the link in the article where you found the new number.

Look forward to your follow-up.

You really need to work on your reading comrehension skills...

However, when you click on the link in article to the data report they are citing, "Weekly status report of the RKI on coronavirus disease-2019 (Covid-19)" from the Koch Institute, 12/30/2021 – UPDATED STATUS FOR GERMANY, SHORT REPORT and translate the pdf from German, right up at the top, in red, it says:

"Correction: On p. 14, the number of unvaccinated among the reported omicron cases on January 3, 2022 was corrected (before: 186; afterwards: 1,097)."

But because I'm feeling charitable, here's a quick tutorial on some of the basics of website functionality, of which, apparently, you seem to be unaware of...



Let me know if you need any further assistance.

Now, why do you think a provided correction somehow renders the article incorrect?

If you cared to read the article you would realize that the entire piece is predicated on the difference between:

Unvaxed = 0.0008%
Vaxed = 0.006%

When in reality, as you so deftly pointed out, it's actually:

Unvaxed = 0.005%
Vaxed = 0.007%

Now apply your math wizardry to the difference between 0.0008% & 0.005% as well as 0.0008% & 0.007%. Let us know what you come up with.

I don't need to.

You need to show why an article that provides correct figures is incorrect.

Already did. (« Reply #154 on: February 03, 2023, 12:19:17 AM »)

2

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: Today at 05:19:22 AM »

Maybe next you could work out the difference between the article's 186 and the actual real data from the source of 1097. Looking forward to your results.

Maybe next time, you could actually point out the link in the article where you found the new number.

Look forward to your follow-up.

You really need to work on your reading comrehension skills...

However, when you click on the link in article to the data report they are citing, "Weekly status report of the RKI on coronavirus disease-2019 (Covid-19)" from the Koch Institute, 12/30/2021 – UPDATED STATUS FOR GERMANY, SHORT REPORT and translate the pdf from German, right up at the top, in red, it says:

"Correction: On p. 14, the number of unvaccinated among the reported omicron cases on January 3, 2022 was corrected (before: 186; afterwards: 1,097)."

But because I'm feeling charitable, here's a quick tutorial on some of the basics of website functionality, of which, apparently, you seem to be unaware of...



Let me know if you need any further assistance.

Now, why do you think a provided correction somehow renders the article incorrect?

If you cared to read the article you would realize that the entire piece is predicated on the difference between:

Unvaxed = 0.0008%
Vaxed = 0.006%

When in reality, as you so deftly pointed out, it's actually:

Unvaxed = 0.005%
Vaxed = 0.007%

Now apply your math wizardry to the difference between 0.0008% & 0.005% as well as 0.0008% & 0.007%. Let us know what you come up with.

3

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: February 03, 2023, 08:00:12 PM »

Maybe next you could work out the difference between the article's 186 and the actual real data from the source of 1097. Looking forward to your results.

Maybe next time, you could actually point out the link in the article where you found the new number.

Look forward to your follow-up.

You really need to work on your reading comrehension skills...

However, when you click on the link in article to the data report they are citing, "Weekly status report of the RKI on coronavirus disease-2019 (Covid-19)" from the Koch Institute, 12/30/2021 – UPDATED STATUS FOR GERMANY, SHORT REPORT and translate the pdf from German, right up at the top, in red, it says:

"Correction: On p. 14, the number of unvaccinated among the reported omicron cases on January 3, 2022 was corrected (before: 186; afterwards: 1,097)."

But because I'm feeling charitable, here's a quick tutorial on some of the basics of website functionality, of which, apparently, you seem to be unaware of...



Let me know if you need any further assistance.

4

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: February 03, 2023, 07:02:48 PM »

What's really interesting is that the article says:

"So the unvaccinated had 186 cases out of 26.5% of the population. While the fully vaccinated had 4020 cases out of 70.53% of the population."

Unvaxed = 186 cases of Omicron, 26% of pop, or 22m
Vaxed = 4020 case of Omicron, 70% of pop, or 61m

(Pay attention to the 186 number)

Meaning the Omincron infection rate is:

Unvaxed = 0.0008%
Vaxed = 0.006%

The article uses that data to then go about their extrapolations.

However, when you click on the link in article to the data report they are citing, "Weekly status report of the RKI on coronavirus disease-2019 (Covid-19)" from the Koch Institute, 12/30/2021 – UPDATED STATUS FOR GERMANY, SHORT REPORT and translate the pdf from German, right up at the top, in red, it says:

"Correction: On p. 14, the number of unvaccinated among the reported omicron cases on January 3, 2022 was corrected (before: 186; afterwards: 1,097)."

So now that 186 number in the article is actually 1097.

Doing the calculations again with the corrected number:

Unvaxed = 186 1097 cases of Omicron, 26% of pop, or 22m
Vaxed = 4020 case of Omicron, 70% of pop, or 61m

Meaning the Omincron infection rate is:

Unvaxed = .0008% 0.005%
Vaxed = 0.006%

Now, it's 0.005% versus 0.006% which renders the entire article incorrect and moot.

Wrong.

It is .005% vs .007%

1097/22000000 * 100 = .00498 or .005

4020/61000000 * 100 = .00659 or .007

Looks like I was off by 0.00041. My bad.

Still renders the article incorrect and moot so I'm not sure what the necessity was for the heavy lifting on the math, but I appreciate the input and correction nonetheless.

Maybe next you could work out the difference between the article's 186 and the actual real data from the source of 1097. Looking forward to your results.

5

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: February 03, 2023, 12:19:17 AM »

What's really interesting is that the article says:

"So the unvaccinated had 186 cases out of 26.5% of the population. While the fully vaccinated had 4020 cases out of 70.53% of the population."

Unvaxed = 186 cases of Omicron, 26% of pop, or 22m
Vaxed = 4020 case of Omicron, 70% of pop, or 61m

(Pay attention to the 186 number)

Meaning the Omincron infection rate is:

Unvaxed = 0.0008%
Vaxed = 0.006%

The article uses that data to then go about their extrapolations.

However, when you click on the link in article to the data report they are citing, "Weekly status report of the RKI on coronavirus disease-2019 (Covid-19)" from the Koch Institute, 12/30/2021 – UPDATED STATUS FOR GERMANY, SHORT REPORT and translate the pdf from German, right up at the top, in red, it says:

"Correction: On p. 14, the number of unvaccinated among the reported omicron cases on January 3, 2022 was corrected (before: 186; afterwards: 1,097)."

So now that 186 number in the article is actually 1097.

Doing the calculations again with the corrected number:

Unvaxed = 186 1097 cases of Omicron, 26% of pop, or 22m
Vaxed = 4020 case of Omicron, 70% of pop, or 61m

Meaning the Omincron infection rate is:

Unvaxed = .0008% 0.005%
Vaxed = 0.006%

Now, it's 0.005% versus 0.006% which renders the entire article incorrect and moot.

6

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: February 01, 2023, 11:17:03 PM »

Germany has a 76.23% full vax rate. Kinda seems obvious that more vaxed people would get covid than unvaxed peoples.

7

Technology & Information / Re: Ask Rushy about Bitcoins.

« on: January 23, 2023, 05:27:32 PM »

BTC seems to be doing ok. No better, no worse than anything else really. I mean if you bought in late 2020 and held, you would have doubled your money today...

8

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: January 22, 2023, 07:49:00 PM »

And I have a really simple question for you. The author claims that the 1600+ listed were killed or harmed by the "COVID Injection". Do you believe that claim to be:

TRUE
or
FALSE

I bet dollars to donuts that you won't answer the question.

The author does not specifically claim that all people died because of the vaccine. This is another lie from you. The author gives the deaths as a reason to be suspicious of the vaccination program.

The author concedes in the first paragraph on the page that it is possible that not all of the people listed were vaccinated: "While it is possible this can happen to people who did not get a COVID vaccine, the sheer numbers clearly point to the only obvious cause."

Please refrain from making blatant lies if you wish to engage in any meaningful discussion.

"While it is possible this can happen to people who did not get a COVID vaccine, the sheer numbers clearly point to the only obvious cause."

"In response to their pronouncement, here is a non-exhaustive and continuously growing list of mainly young athletes who had major medical issues in 2021/2022 after receiving one or more COVID vaccines."

Seems pretty clear they are saying what the “only obvious cause” is and that their list is of people who were harmed "after receiving one or more COVID vaccines.”

And yet we find many, many entries in the list where vax status is completely absent/unknown. How is it a list of people who received "one or more COVID vaccines" when we don't have any evidence that they did receive "one or more COVID vaccines"? How does that work?

Still won't answer the True/False question? Didn't think so.

9

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Phases of Venus & Lunar Eclipses on Other Planets

« on: January 22, 2023, 04:29:50 PM »

This may be of some interest (2018):

For the First Time, Physicists Accelerated Light Beams in Curved Space in the Lab
The successful experiment "opens the doors to a new avenue of study in the field of accelerating beams."

Physicists have demonstrated accelerating light beams on flat surfaces, where acceleration has caused the beams to follow curved trajectories. However, a new experiment has pushed the boundaries of what's possible to demonstrate in a lab. For the first time in an expeirment, physicists have demonstrated an accelerating light beam in curved space. Instead of traveling along a geodesic trajectory (the shortest path on a curved surface) it bends away from this trajectory due to the acceleration.

Paper referenced in the article:
Observation of Accelerating Wave Packets in Curved Space

10

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: January 08, 2023, 11:51:42 PM »

Exclaiming that none of the articles have vax status might be hyperbole.

I didn't claim none. Just the ones I checked where there was no mention of vax status. Pretty simple really.

Claiming that you checked the ten articles before and the ten articles after is not. That is a blatant lie of claiming to do something you did not do to try to win your argument.

And how exactly did you determine this?

And I have a really simple question for you. The author claims that the 1600+ listed were killed or harmed by the "COVID Injection". Do you believe that claim to be:

TRUE
or
FALSE

I bet dollars to donuts that you won't answer the question.

11

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: January 08, 2023, 12:36:11 AM »

Tap-Dancing Tom Bishop has to latch on to inappropriate hyperbole from Stack to cover up how shitty his source and argument are.

What's hyperbole to me is lying by claiming that 1600+ people died or were harmed by a vaccine when rafts of them have no evidence of being vaccinated. I mean, that's just an out and out lie.
Now my hyperbole may be that there shouldn't be a single error in the morbid list. But when I keep finding ones where the author even went to the trouble of linking to news articles as if proof of COVID Injections as the killer and no mention of COVID Injections is found, time and time again, it is clear the source is dubious at best and indefensible.

12

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: January 08, 2023, 12:12:55 AM »

Cassano was admitted to the hospital for Covid 19. Got two doses of vax and sent home after he recovered from Covid.
Kondilios I said was vaxed, but according to the news report, died from Covid.
And the Matty guy I said probably got his heart problem from the vax, a known but rare side effect.

So you lied to us then when you said:

None of the articles mentioned the deceased vax status. Zero. Not a one.

Nope. I was referring to the ones I originally checked.

And you lied to us again here:

It's pretty clear you're the one doing the lying. You found one. Good for you. I checked the news stories for the 10 before yours and the 10 after. No mention of vaccine status. Zero.

You did not check the 10 news stories before and 10 after. You lied to us.

Yep, I did check them.  Go ahead and look for yourself.

Funny how you said nothing of the others I checked with no mentioned vax status. Hmmmm.

You said that you checked the articles. You didn't. You lied.

Nope. I did check them. Go ahead and look for yourself.

And go ahead and check the ones I checked. Especially my favorite:

16/06/2022 Algeria Dead
Billel Ben Hamouda
Died on Thursday evening in a car accident, NO mention of vax status

Car accident?

The point being, when the author claims that "1621 Athlete Cardiac Arrests, Serious Issues, 1118 of Them Dead, Since COVID Injection" then the list of 1621 better all be dead or harmed by a "COVID Injection". Meaning, the vax status for 1621 should be known for each and every one of them and be a YES for COVID Injection. And I (or anyone) can find many with vax status completely unmentioned and unknown. So put on your thinking cap and explain how 1621 people died or were harmed by a "COVID Injection" when it's unknown as to whether they ever had a "COVID Injection". In other words, the author is lying. Not me.

How you're not getting this is is remarkable. Do you think it's ok to claim that someone died from a vaccine when they actually died in a car accident? Do you believe that car accidents are actually COVID Injections?

13

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: January 07, 2023, 08:21:16 PM »

Cassano was admitted to the hospital for Covid 19. Got two doses of vax and sent home after he recovered from Covid.
Kondilios I said was vaxed, but according to the news report, died from Covid.
And the Matty guy I said probably got his heart problem from the vax, a known but rare side effect.

Funny how you said nothing of the others I checked with no mentioned vax status. Hmmmm.

And again, if someone is gonna make a blog post and claim "1621 Athlete Cardiac Arrests, Serious Issues, 1118 of Them Dead, Since COVID Injection" shouldn't you know the COVID Injection status of each?

That's an awfully bold claim to not know if someone got the COVID Injection or not, don't you think?

More random spot-checking:

25/06/2022 Minnesota, USA Dead
William Harding
Two News reports, actually obits, NO mention of vax status
_______

15/08/2022 Michigan, USA Dead
Tyler Edwards
Even for a linked Gateway Pundit article; NO mention of vax status
_______

28/04/2022 Tennessee, USA
Linton Beck
NO mention of vax status
_______

01/04/2022 England Dead
Hannah Purvis
NO mention of vax status
_______

16/06/2022 Algeria Dead
Billel Ben Hamouda
Died on Thursday evening in a car accident, NO mention of vax status

Died in a car accident? Doesn't quite sound like death by "COVID Injection" now does it?

14

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: January 07, 2023, 09:41:53 AM »

This is a blatant lie as well. Checking the ten news stories before number 973 and ten after that number shows that you came here and decided to lie to us again.

As Dave mentioned, I checked the "News" stories for each. I assume the author put those News links there for a reason. None of the News links that I checked mention the vaccine status so how would the author know the vaccine status?

From yours:

Kondilios, from news story, vaccinated, died from Dorono virus:

"Devastated friends and family of a healthy 23-year-old who died this week after being hospitalised for Covid-19 have pleaded with the public to take the virus seriously."

James Kondilios, a respected young scientist and powerlifter who lived in Canberra, was double vaccinated and had no underlying health issues, but died on Tuesday at St Vincent's Hospital.

He was being treated there after suffering severe complications from Covid-19, leaving his loved ones in shock."

Matty John, suffered pericarditis most likely from the vax ( not sure which one), which is terrible. But a known rare side effect. Didn't die.

Cassano, from the news story, "Antonio Cassano was discharged from the San Martino polyclinic in Genoa where he had been hospitalized a few days ago for treatment resulting from the positive state of Covid-19."

No vax status mentioned.

More random picks 700's, 800', 900's:

06/01/2022 Luxembourg Dead
Mathieu Léonard
No mention of vax status in News link

14/01/2022 Brazil Dead
Jader Cezario de Oliveira
No mention of vax status in News link

05/02/2022 Italy Dead
Assare Seare
No mention of vax status in News link

24/02/2022 NZ Dead
Va’aiga Tuigamala
No mention of vax status in News link

Like I said, if you create a blog post titled, "1621 Athlete Cardiac Arrests, Serious Issues, 1118 of Them Dead, Since COVID Injection" you at least need to know and provide evidence of "Covid Injection" status, right?

15

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: January 06, 2023, 06:43:55 PM »

That's not the right link though. The data is from https://goodsciencing.com/covid/athletes-suffer-cardiac-arrest-die-after-covid-shot/

Someone posted the same link on the other site a couple of days ago. I spot-checked a few dozen listed, looking at the news article links associated with each. None of the articles mentioned the deceased vax status. Zero. Not a one.

Well this is a lie. There are plenty of mentions of "vaccine" in the news article section.

It's pretty clear you're the one doing the lying. You found one. Good for you. I checked the news stories for the 10 before yours and the 10 after. No mention of vaccine status. Zero.

If someone was actually being truthful, there shouldn't be a single name on that list where the vaccine status is unknown, not mentioned.

The literal title of the post is "1616 Athlete Cardiac Arrests, Serious Issues, 1114 of Them Dead, Since COVID Injection"

"Since Covid Injection" Get it? Yet all the ones I've looked at there's no mention of a "Covid Injection". Now do you get how wrong this is?

16

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: January 05, 2023, 08:26:39 AM »

That's not the right link though. The data is from https://goodsciencing.com/covid/athletes-suffer-cardiac-arrest-die-after-covid-shot/

Someone posted the same link on the other site a couple of days ago. I spot-checked a few dozen listed, looking at the news article links associated with each. None of the articles mentioned the deceased vax status. Zero. Not a one.

So it's a running list of anyone the author claims is an "athlete" who happened to die with zero reference as to whether they were vaxxed or not.

Summary: Basically anyone who died in the last 2 years, died from the vaccines even if they weren't vaccinated.

Utterly pathetic.

17

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: January 04, 2023, 11:32:54 PM »

Wow! Who knew - The vax's cause alcoholism, car crashes, avalanches, stabbings, and cliff-diving into rocks. Shocking!

18

Flat Earth Investigations / Re: The Flat Earth Scientific Proof

« on: January 04, 2023, 07:10:51 PM »

https://unshackledminds.com/convex-earth-the-documentary-the-flat-earth-scientific-proof/

No curvature with multiple tests.

The lies of a Globe are just that. ALL LIES

I scrubbed through the video. What's weird is that they don't show any of the results of any of the "tests". They just talk about them, but never actually reveal anything. Did you actually watch the video?

19

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: January 04, 2023, 04:58:56 AM »

https://federalinquirer.com/in-1994-160-nations-agreed-to-reduce-the-world-population-to-800-million-by-2030/

In 1994 160 Nations Agreed to Reduce the World Population to 800 Million by 2030

2. Man Made Viruses and Diseases like Fauci’s AIDS virus, when he placed them in Vaccines that were Specifically Targeted to the GAY Population. Also included were multiple man made mutations of the flu, Ebola, etc. The first outbreak was supposed to be released in late 2017 or 2018… well, it was actually 2019.


We have to resist these Vaccines and WAKE UP to what they are trying to do.

The Global Economic and Social Reset is scheduled for 2025.

– Man-made Flu Around 2018 To Depopulate the World To 800 Million. (Pretty Close!)

Entirely fabricated. It's quite remarkable how you will fall for absolutely anything. It's actually impressive.

Here's the final report from the conference. Nothing in your article even remotely resembles anything in the report regarding Agenda 21 or otherwise. It's all about what nations should look to implement in order to handle population growth in a sustainable, socially decent manner. Zero about reducing population. Nothing, nada. Your article is complete garbage.

And there is zero, especially, regarding "The FINAL Stage of their Sinister Plan is supposed to take place in 2024, they plan on causing a fake UFO invasion event with the purpose of brining in Martial Law. From their on, everything will change and our freedom will be gone forever."

Which is absolutely hilarious. How do you find this stuff? Pure comedy gold.

Read for yourself and perhaps put on your thinking cap before googling and/or adjust your feeds.

Report of the International Conference on Population and Development
Cairo, 5-13 September 1994

20

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: January 04, 2023, 04:32:43 AM »

These aren't little boys, these are grown muscle men in the best shape of their lives loaded up on vaccines and boosters.

"No player has died directly resulting from an on-field injury in over 51 years, so the fact we’ve come this close to potential tragedy is exceptionally noteworthy.

- There is massive speculation about the cause of Hamlin’s collapse, and it seems a heart problem is the cause." Twitter

1988 - It's not like this hasn't happened before, even to grown muscle men in the best shape of their lives NOT loaded up on vaccines and boosters...

Chris Pronger, a Hockey Hall of Fame defenseman, recalls his 'scary' cardiac event

Pronger was 23 years old and competing with the St. Louis Blues in the Western Conference semifinals of the Stanley Cup Playoffs when he was struck on the left side of his chest by a slap shot from Detroit Red Wings defenseman Dmitri Mironov.

Like Hamlin before his collapse on the field, Pronger managed to stand up following the impact and took two strides before falling to the ice. Teammates huddled around Pronger. Both athletic training staffs rushed to his side.

Pronger was rushed to Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit and diagnosed with commotio cordis, which is a disruption of rhythm that occurs as a result of a blow to the area directly over the heart at a critical time during the cycle of a heartbeat.