You've made under 200 posts in the upper forums in 5 years. You've made 300 in the religious section. Your friend, rushy, told me to get lost one year ago: he said something to the effect, "pick up your things, get out, and never come back".
Where would we be? Once I came on board, everything changed for the FES (2007-present, especially the period 2009-2014). If FET is so popular now on youtube, it is because I contributed more than anybody else in the debates, for the first time providing the answers everyone was looking for, and much more than that. I never used ENaG or any other classic FE material, I started anew. I was the only one able to explain the beam neutrinos, ring laser gyroscopes, seismic waves, Eotvos effect. Without my input, the FES would find itself at the level where it was in 2006, a mere curiosity, debates which went nowhere.
Where is your original material? Everything you post is copy pasta. My global natural logarithm formula:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1910773#msg1910773The hidden structure of the zeros of the zeta function:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1855591#msg1855591 (18 parts)
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2006274#msg2006274 (5 parts)
The first correct explanation for long distance projectiles on a flat earth:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2029817#msg2029817 (2 parts)
The flat earth terrestrial gravity hydrodynamic equation:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2033009#msg2033009 (8 parts)
The difference between the Sagnac and the Coriolis effect registered by interferometers:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2024700#msg2024700 (10 parts)
The first correct quantum atomic model of the ether atom, the crucial observation that the second string in the Whittaker potential waves is the gravitational wave (dextrorotatory spin):
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2006274#msg2006274TUNGUSKA event linked to FET:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1676400#msg1676400 (6 parts)
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1995026#msg1995026 (2 parts)
No other FE had ever thought to link the Tunguska explosion to the fact that it becomes the most direct proof of the flatness of the Earth's surface. But I did.
And much more.
I brought to the FES undreamed of levels of rigor, graduate level mathematics and physics, striking proofs, correct explanations for each FE phenomenon, A-Z.
You don't debate. It doesn't matter what I reply, you won't read it. You'll just paste the next paragraph of something you don't understand under my post. Then the next. That isn't a debate. My "long posts" always receive the most views.
That is what readers want to see.
They seek to be challenged, they want more than just plain information, they are looking for energy, power, spirituality, you have to establish a relationship based on trust with them.
What does that even mean? You ripped it out of context.My viewers know that I always provide the very best explanations, proofs, bibliographical references. Always. No ripping out of context.
If the Earth was moving upwards, this fact would be registered not only by the GPS satellites, but by every RING LASER GYROSCOPE interferometer in the world. It is a fact that this does not happen.
Those interferometers do not even register the 30 km/s orbital speed, or the rotational speed.
Your assertions have just been refuted.
The Sagnac effect is for a ROTATING round earth and the discrepancy between a transmission out to the satellite that is moving a long way (bigger circle) and the transmission back to a rotating earth (smaller circle) giving rise to different speeds. That is why the readers do not read your messages (perhaps only marginally) and come by the hundreds of thousands to read mine.
The Sagnac effect registers TRANSLATIONAL/LINEAR/UNIFORM MOTION. Please convince yourself:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2023979#msg2023979If I opened a thread in a part of the forum no one else had access to and was able to keep bumping it for 8 years? I suspect it would rack up thousands of views by virtue of the traffic on the forum and nothing to do with the content I put inside it. There are plenty of other threads which have been "bumped" over the years: they get nowhere the numbers of views that my messages receive. My AFET is not required reading. It is not "post a picture of yourself" or "now playing". Just 18 pages. A formidable achievement to get over 400,000 views.
That is what the readers want to see, to read.
You mean this?
https://forum.tfes.org/index.php?topic=1183.0Is this supposed to be a joke?
That thread has 102 PAGES.
My AFET has just 18 pages.
You do the math.
https://forum.tfes.org/index.php?topic=1196.026 PAGES.
My AFET does not get bumped by having other users post new messages. The readers come to get the best information possible on FET on a voluntary basis.
By far, the most successful thread in the history of any FE forum.
If you did open a thread, presenting your views on FET, you'd find very fast how difficult it is to keep the readers' interest alive for your messages, even for a period of time measured in months. It is an art to have them come back again and again, to give them what they really want.
Make no mistake about it: the readers, RE and FE, want to be challenged with lengthy messages, with plenty of information, with the correct explanations.