Oh, yeah no 4k was a must as I need to test websites in 4k these days and have retina ready images. I can always downscale to 1080p to see what that looks like too, but I can't upscale my current monitor. 4k is the reason I had to purchase. I could have just got a monitor, but it wasn't a huge amount more for an entire PC and my little NUC is getting long in the tooth with its dual core CPU.
Heat.
Yeah, I do like my computer to stfu whilst I'm working. This thing has heat pipes. Whilst working, it should be relatively quiet because I won't be asking much of the graphics card. When I play a game, the fan will ramp up, but I won't be able to hear that over the sound of all that victory.
The processor is 65W which should be fine. I won't overclock it and have little need to push it to 100% during the day. I use a 1.8 boosting to 2.9 dual core i5 right now and its fine. The graphics card is the laptop version ... ie it runs 110W instead of 180W TDP. This will probably amount to about a 25% hit on graphics, but I don't have extreme requirements. I'm moving up from intel 540 HD graphics after all. It should be a huge improvement. It'll still be better than a 1050ti would perform and that would have been my choice for a desktop build based on my requirements.
Small is always a premium. But I built a shuttle when they first came out, I have a NUC now, I had 2 other small form factor PCs as well. I haven't had a tower in over 10 years. I just don't need workstation horsepower and put my focus onto things that don't take up a lot of real estate. This same machine can be specced with a 1700 8 core Ryzen as well (twice as many cores and higher base clock), so it wont be the hottest version of this machine they sell.