Maybe the wiki should use some revisions:
During the start of the Apollo missions former NASA Safety Inspector Thomas Ronald Baron participated in a Congressional Hearing where he complained that NASA was not operating a real safe space program.
He complained about NASA's fraudulent unsafe practices, low quality control, and the practice of keeping every employee in the dark about the big picture{source?}. R. E. Reyes, an engineer in KSC's Preflight Operations Branch, said Baron filed so many negative charges against NASA that, had KSC heeded them all, NASA would not have had a man on the moon until the year 2069.{source?}
Thomas was a real fear that the program could be stopped in its tracks
—Julian Scheer, Former NASA Spokesman {source?}
Baron testified before congress that the Apollo program was such disarray the United States would never make it to the moon {source?}. His claim and his opinions made him the target {source?}.
Then, ironically, Baron himself was stopped in his tracks. Exactly one week after he testified before Congress and only days before his report was set to be released Baron's car was stocked hit by a train. Baron, his wife and his step daughter were killed instantly. The incident was deemed by the police to be an accident. Baron's unpublished 500 page Congressional Report detailing the specific deficiencies of the Apollo program was never found publicly published after being delivered to Congress before his death.
One small extra bit on the end there, as Thomas himself stated his report was delivered to the head of the Congressional committee exploring this. This quite firmly plants the trail of ownership as ending with Congress as far as public record is concerned. It not being released to the public is very different than not being 'found' (whatever that might mean since it implies he had it on him at time of death).
The listed quote by Julian Scheer I as well would be very interested in seeing a source for, as a search for it only brings up the TFES Wiki page. Sounds so far like the claim recently on the other site that Colombus got into a fight with his crew over his belief the Earth is flat. Although I suppose there's always the famous quote: "The internet, like myself, can never tell a lie." - Abraham Lincoln.
Did you try checking the bottom of the article for the source that information comes from?
Oh yes, I'm certain a YouTube video titled: "Thomas Baron and astronauts killed to keep Apollo program alive" is a great source of legitimate and unbiased information. That doesn't change the fact your second source doesn't agree with what you've written in the wiki page, and the actual accounts available don't either.
"There was real fear, that the program could be stopped dead in it's tracks" - Julian Scheer. No context, just a sound bite. Oh yeah, seems super trustworthy. Definitely talking about Thomas and couldn't be any of a number of things that happened during the early years.
The YouTube video is something straight from FOX NEWS, which you'll excuse me for being instantly wary of the legitimacy of presentation. Your wiki STILL lies about what was said, even in that video though btw.
http://www.clavius.org/baron.html Seems a fairly decent breakdown of the issues your wiki raises about Thomas. History claims the report was indeed delivered to Congress. That it disappeared isn't necessarily evidence of foul play either. It not being strong evidence is a compelling point in favor of it not being hung onto for more normal reasons.
I know you're trying to make it seem like whistleblowing is highly dangerous here, but protections for those doing so are also much higher than in Thomas's time, not to mention many countries very likely willing to take someone in and come out with their own evidence in this scenario.
Clavius is a NASA-funded site. The authors admit that it was written by "space industry professionals".
As far as the website I linked, it's given as a source by Wikipedia (and the TFES wiki by extension), and the logic follows cleanly in his statements, with the facts backed up by publicly available information.
Did you try checking the bottom of the article for the source that information comes from?
literally a *youtube* video and the very wikipedia article contradicting your page. No evidence from a valid source stating reasons for the inferences.
The Fox documentary says that the report was not found. The Wikipedia page says [citation needed] next to the assertion someone put in that the report was delivered.
"Mr. BARON: I have sent to the chairman of this committee a more through report which includes all the names."
"Mr. TEAGUE: Your report went to the chairman of the full committee [i.e., Rep. George P. Miller, Chairman of the House Committee on Science and Astronautics. --Clavius], not to me. He told me he received it."
http://www.clavius.org/baron-test.html