[juner]

Foiled again, stupid facts and math and stuff, LOL

I don't know if you can tell, but there is an actual discussion taking place here. You aren't adding anything to the discussion with this. You are on two warnings already, I will give you one final one to refrain from low-content posting in the upper fora. Next one is a few days off to review the rules.

[TomInAustin]

This is our current map.

Perfect, this can be the basis of getting the flight times back on track.  Please jump over into that thread with your map.

[TropeADope]

This is our current map.

Perfect, this can be the basis of getting the flight times back on track.  Please jump over into that thread with your map.

Yes, are we going with this being a legit map for the TFES community? Any FEers want to speak now or forever hold your peace?

[juner]

Yes, are we going with this being a legit map for the TFES community? Any FEers want to speak now or forever hold your peace?

You have under 20 posts. You have spent no time here. Please don't try and dictate anything regarding the map or who can comment on it and when. It comes off as incredibly pretentious. If Rushy wants to use the azithmul equidistant projection map as the center of discussion, then he is welcome to as it is the one used for reference in the FAQ/wiki. Had you spent any time researching the matter, you would know that.

[TropeADope]

Yes, are we going with this being a legit map for the TFES community? Any FEers want to speak now or forever hold your peace?

You have under 20 posts. You have spent no time here. Please don't try and dictate anything regarding the map or who can comment on it and when. It comes off as incredibly pretentious. If Rushy wants to use the azithmul equidistant projection map as the center of discussion, then he is welcome to as it is the one used for reference in the FAQ/wiki. Had you spent any time researching the matter, you would know that.

Not trying to be pretentious, I know what the wiki says, I've read it. I'd like to point your attention to what rushy said. "This is our map." I don't think he was referring to himself in a pluralistic manner. I took that to mean he meant it was the FEers map. That is why I asked other FEers to comment as a failure to do so would result in a fight I'm sure (as I have read through quite a few threads) about the map. If it's not your map, maybe remove it from the wiki that you refer people to all the time to learn about FET or at the very least maybe tell rushy to not throw more than himself into that boat.

As for the time I have spent here, I have spent far more time reading than posting. I, for one, like to be informed before I start spouting crap. I didn't even make an account until I felt that I understood what had/has been debated already and what the outcomes were. Also, I said nothing about who "could comment" on it. I asked if anyone wanted to contest rushy's statement of "we"

If anyone took my post as pretentious, I'm sorry. I did not mean it that way.

[juner]

Yes, are we going with this being a legit map for the TFES community? Any FEers want to speak now or forever hold your peace?

You have under 20 posts. You have spent no time here. Please don't try and dictate anything regarding the map or who can comment on it and when. It comes off as incredibly pretentious. If Rushy wants to use the azithmul equidistant projection map as the center of discussion, then he is welcome to as it is the one used for reference in the FAQ/wiki. Had you spent any time researching the matter, you would know that.

Not trying to be pretentious, I know what the wiki says, I've read it. I'd like to point your attention to what rushy said. "This is our map." I don't think he was referring to himself in a pluralistic manner. I took that to mean he meant it was the FEers map. That is why I asked other FEers to comment as a failure to do so would result in a fight I'm sure (as I have read through quite a few threads) about the map. If it's not your map, maybe remove it from the wiki that you refer people to all the time to learn about FET or at the very least maybe tell rushy to not throw more than himself into that boat.

As for the time I have spent here, I have spent far more time reading than posting. I, for one, like to be informed before I start spouting crap. I didn't even make an account until I felt that I understood what had/has been debated already and what the outcomes were. Also, I said nothing about who "could comment" on it. I asked if anyone wanted to contest rushy's statement of "we"

If anyone took my post as pretentious, I'm sorry. I did not mean it that way.

Apologies, I must have misinterpreted. The posting patterns of new users I see are fairly common, so I may have jumped the gun.

Anyway, Rushy can defend himself if he so chooses, I won't speak for him.

[TropeADope]

Yes, are we going with this being a legit map for the TFES community? Any FEers want to speak now or forever hold your peace?

You have under 20 posts. You have spent no time here. Please don't try and dictate anything regarding the map or who can comment on it and when. It comes off as incredibly pretentious. If Rushy wants to use the azithmul equidistant projection map as the center of discussion, then he is welcome to as it is the one used for reference in the FAQ/wiki. Had you spent any time researching the matter, you would know that.

Not trying to be pretentious, I know what the wiki says, I've read it. I'd like to point your attention to what rushy said. "This is our map." I don't think he was referring to himself in a pluralistic manner. I took that to mean he meant it was the FEers map. That is why I asked other FEers to comment as a failure to do so would result in a fight I'm sure (as I have read through quite a few threads) about the map. If it's not your map, maybe remove it from the wiki that you refer people to all the time to learn about FET or at the very least maybe tell rushy to not throw more than himself into that boat.

As for the time I have spent here, I have spent far more time reading than posting. I, for one, like to be informed before I start spouting crap. I didn't even make an account until I felt that I understood what had/has been debated already and what the outcomes were. Also, I said nothing about who "could comment" on it. I asked if anyone wanted to contest rushy's statement of "we"

If anyone took my post as pretentious, I'm sorry. I did not mean it that way.

Apologies, I must have misinterpreted. The posting patterns of new users I see are fairly common, so I may have jumped the gun.

Anyway, Rushy can defend himself if he so chooses, I won't speak for him.

Not asking you to speak for him. Simply pointing out that it looks like he is speaking for you guys. If no one challenged his assertion, it would be a "how do flights from xx to xx work?" bloodbath. I for one am really sick of hearing the same arguments time and time again. That's why I started this thread. Seemed like magnetism as a debate hadn't been done or even touched on in the wiki, yet sailors and pilots have used it for quite a long time.