I still hope to get a more savy reply. I only had internet access for 5 month, to find out about all the crazy theories they post on youtube. Before, I relied on a few books of astronomy, astrology and my ephemeris to understand and follow the celestial activities. I have been eye watching the motion of the moon and 5 closest planets throughout this new millenium to confirm my understanding. Explaining the clockwork to many educated people about astological birthcharts and comparing personnality traits according planetary positioning never left me in error and misinterpretation. I get satisfactory readings of pleople I don't even know. I don' t claim to have any psychic ability to support my success, when I hear how precise my readings are. I only follow the guidelines of the knoledge I learned.
I always look up to the sky to confirm the celestial bodies positions, that correspond to the old print out of my ephemeris and the match is there. The moon's light always correspond with its angle to the Sun. I have trouble picturing how the Sun's light doen't reach the moon in anyway. And those blooming organism on the Moon always cover the same zones precicely, every month?
The firsts observations of the transit of Venus were done in a dark room with a pin hole through the wall to project the Sun's light onto an other wall. No telescope, no camera, no Nasa, unless you tell me the book I read was made up! When I saw the transit taking place, I was sitting on the beach with my wife, kids and some friends and we were sharing this eclipse goggle, we got from the Keck observatory office. On our way back home, we stopped at the Canada-France-Hawai'i observatory office to look through the telescopes they set up. It was the same image seen from the goggles. I saw Venus as it first came from the Sun's rim, up to 4 hours later, but not the rest of its passage accross the Sun's face, which lasted a few more hours.
I can accept the Flat Earth model watching videos on maps, flat horizons, long distance sighings of ships, debunking Nasa's falsifications, Admiral Byrd's interview, but the celestial activity models seems a little far fetch.
Please, give me some solid clarity and stump my view well!