*

Offline markjo

  • *
  • Posts: 8524
  • Zetetic Council runner-up
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #13300 on: July 08, 2025, 09:08:34 PM »
Trump has had multiple affairs. He’s been adjudicated to be a rapist.
But none of that happened while Trump was in office (as far as we know), so none of it counts.
Abandon hope all ye who press enter here.

Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.

Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge. -- Charles Darwin

If you can't demonstrate it, then you shouldn't believe it.

*

Offline juner

  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10276
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #13301 on: July 08, 2025, 09:56:47 PM »
my french buddy, chip, let me know how to handle these things but it isnt really appropriate for the forum.

also page 666. nice.

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 8445
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #13302 on: July 08, 2025, 10:32:16 PM »
my french buddy, chip, let me know how to handle these things but it isnt really appropriate for the forum.

also page 666. nice.

Trump is now satanic.
Fact
The conviction will get overturned on appeal.

*

Offline Tom Bishop

  • Zetetic Council Member
  • **
  • Posts: 11118
  • Flat Earth Believer
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #13303 on: Today at 03:21:20 AM »
The jury actually ruled that he didn't rape anyone.

Is someone who has an affair logically more or less likely to cut taxes? To pursue foreign intervention? To support gay marriage? It doesn't really make sense.
Remember who you’re talking to.
I’ve literally no idea what Action is talking about. Clinton had an affair with an intern and therefore he’s left wing seems to be the implication.

It’s a “if she floats then she’s made of wood and therefore a witch” level of logic.

Trump has had multiple affairs. He’s been adjudicated to be a rapist. So what does that make him? Is that more or less left wing than Clinton? Just utter nonsense

Please stop lying. The jury ruled that he didn't rape E. Jean Caroll, and the leftists here were in shambles over it.
« Last Edit: Today at 02:39:11 PM by Tom Bishop »

*

Offline AATW

  • *
  • Posts: 6996
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #13304 on: Today at 06:20:45 AM »
Please stop lying. The jury ruled that he didn't rape E. Jean Caroll, and the leftists here were in shambles over it.
Aww, bless. You don’t understand the difference between adjudicated and convicted, do you? Trump is a convicted felon and an adjudicated rapist.

If a jury says someone is not guilty that doesn’t actually mean they’re saying the person didn’t do it. It just means they don’t believe the evidence is good enough to establish beyond reasonable doubt that they did. For good reason there is a high bar for conviction, and rape cases have a notoriously low level of conviction.

But the judge clearly believed Trump did it

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/aug/07/donald-trump-rape-language-e-jean-carroll

That’s the trade off with the high bar for conviction. You don’t want innocent people being locked up but you do end up with a lot of people, like Trump, who are most likely rapists walking free.
Tom: "Claiming incredulity is a pretty bad argument. Calling it "insane" or "ridiculous" is not a good argument at all."

TFES Wiki Occam's Razor page, by Tom: "What's the simplest explanation; that NASA has successfully designed and invented never before seen rocket technologies from scratch which can accelerate 100 tons of matter to an escape velocity of 7 miles per second"

*

Offline honk

  • *
  • Posts: 3706
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #13305 on: Today at 06:39:42 AM »
No, he's talking about the fact that Trump was found liable for sexual abuse rather than rape. We spent several pages discussing this back when the news first broke. According to Tom, the fact that the jury chose not to find Trump liable for rape is a clear repudiation of Carroll's entire story and proof that Trump is entirely innocent; however, the fact that the same jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation when he denied the whole thing even happened means nothing at all.
« Last Edit: Today at 05:45:46 PM by honk »
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y

Offline Action80

  • *
  • Posts: 3598
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #13306 on: Today at 07:30:02 AM »
It's a matter of politics, certainly, but not of policy.
Yes, of course.

There are no government policies regarding sexual conduct in the workplace. ::)
To be honest I am getting pretty bored of this place.

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 8445
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #13307 on: Today at 07:39:22 AM »
It's a matter of politics, certainly, but not of policy.
Yes, of course.

There are no government policies regarding sexual conduct in the workplace. ::)
Between two conscenting adults?  Sometimes but that exists in every business as well so I'm not sure I'd call it a government policy if private sectors do it as well.
The conviction will get overturned on appeal.

*

Offline honk

  • *
  • Posts: 3706
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #13308 on: Today at 07:51:41 AM »
It's a matter of politics, certainly, but not of policy.
Yes, of course.

There are no government policies regarding sexual conduct in the workplace. ::)

Look, you're just being obstinate at this point. You know what I mean. Clinton's affairs didn't make him any less of a centrist.
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y

*

Offline AATW

  • *
  • Posts: 6996
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #13309 on: Today at 09:54:47 AM »
No, he's talking about the fact that Trump was found liable for sexual abuse rather than rape. We spent several pages discussing this back when the news first broke. According to Tom, the fact that the jury chose not to find Trump liable for rape is a clear repudiation of Carroll's entire story and proof that Trump is entirely innocent; however, the fact that the same jury found Trump liable for sexusl abuse and defamation when he denied the whole thing even happened means nothing at all.
Ah yes. Schrödinger's Jury. Beyond reproach when they find Trump not guilty, irrelevant when they find him guilty.
Cult members gotta cult member I guess.
Tom: "Claiming incredulity is a pretty bad argument. Calling it "insane" or "ridiculous" is not a good argument at all."

TFES Wiki Occam's Razor page, by Tom: "What's the simplest explanation; that NASA has successfully designed and invented never before seen rocket technologies from scratch which can accelerate 100 tons of matter to an escape velocity of 7 miles per second"

Offline Action80

  • *
  • Posts: 3598
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #13310 on: Today at 10:27:31 AM »
The government is the sole reason why there are policies governing sexual activity within the workplace.

Of course Sadaam is being obstinate.

Clintons are "centrist."

What a fucking joke of a take.
To be honest I am getting pretty bored of this place.

*

Offline AATW

  • *
  • Posts: 6996
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #13311 on: Today at 02:35:55 PM »
Clintons are "centrist."

What a fucking joke of a take.
Whether they are or not, the weird thing is you seem to be evidencing your position that they aren't by the fact Clinton had an affair with an intern.
"He cant be centrist! He got a blow job in the oval office!".

What the hell are you talking about? How are those two things linked?
Try "He can't be a centrist, he did <insert non-centrist policy he implemented here>"
Tom: "Claiming incredulity is a pretty bad argument. Calling it "insane" or "ridiculous" is not a good argument at all."

TFES Wiki Occam's Razor page, by Tom: "What's the simplest explanation; that NASA has successfully designed and invented never before seen rocket technologies from scratch which can accelerate 100 tons of matter to an escape velocity of 7 miles per second"

*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 8445
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #13312 on: Today at 02:57:35 PM »
Clintons are "centrist."

What a fucking joke of a take.
Whether they are or not, the weird thing is you seem to be evidencing your position that they aren't by the fact Clinton had an affair with an intern.
"He cant be centrist! He got a blow job in the oval office!".

What the hell are you talking about? How are those two things linked?
Try "He can't be a centrist, he did <insert non-centrist policy he implemented here>"
No no he's right.  Only right wing folk have affairs.  Left are faithful.
The conviction will get overturned on appeal.

*

Offline AATW

  • *
  • Posts: 6996
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #13313 on: Today at 04:40:07 PM »
I wonder what they’re doing to prepare.
Giving all the local young women rape alarms and pepper spray?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm20xvgmd8yo
Tom: "Claiming incredulity is a pretty bad argument. Calling it "insane" or "ridiculous" is not a good argument at all."

TFES Wiki Occam's Razor page, by Tom: "What's the simplest explanation; that NASA has successfully designed and invented never before seen rocket technologies from scratch which can accelerate 100 tons of matter to an escape velocity of 7 miles per second"

Offline Action80

  • *
  • Posts: 3598
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #13314 on: Today at 04:53:37 PM »
Clintons are "centrist."

What a fucking joke of a take.
Whether they are or not, the weird thing is you seem to be evidencing your position that they aren't by the fact Clinton had an affair with an intern.
"He cant be centrist! He got a blow job in the oval office!".

What the hell are you talking about? How are those two things linked?
Try "He can't be a centrist, he did <insert non-centrist policy he implemented here>"
Your lack of knowledge concerning the actions of the Clinton administration is not helping at all.

Plenty of steps taken that were certainly not centrist.

But then again, the so-called leftists here, like you, are actually totalitarians.
To be honest I am getting pretty bored of this place.

*

Offline AATW

  • *
  • Posts: 6996
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #13315 on: Today at 04:59:29 PM »
Plenty of steps taken that were certainly not centrist.
Well, maybe. So give examples of those then.
Banging an intern isn’t one of them.
Tom: "Claiming incredulity is a pretty bad argument. Calling it "insane" or "ridiculous" is not a good argument at all."

TFES Wiki Occam's Razor page, by Tom: "What's the simplest explanation; that NASA has successfully designed and invented never before seen rocket technologies from scratch which can accelerate 100 tons of matter to an escape velocity of 7 miles per second"

*

Offline juner

  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10276
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #13316 on: Today at 05:49:47 PM »
Giving all the local young women rape alarms and pepper spray?

i think they needed that long before trump swings by (we can jump down that little rabbit hole as well since it turns out there are simply just a lot of shitty people in the world).

*

Offline Tom Bishop

  • Zetetic Council Member
  • **
  • Posts: 11118
  • Flat Earth Believer
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #13317 on: Today at 06:10:12 PM »
It is rather odd that AATW is worried about Trump but has never made mention of the increasing reports of rape and sexual assaults in his country as result of immigration, instead claiming that migrants have done good for his country.

*

Offline AATW

  • *
  • Posts: 6996
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #13318 on: Today at 06:59:08 PM »
It is rather odd that AATW is worried about Trump but has never made mention of the increasing reports of rape and sexual assaults in his country as result of immigration, instead claiming that migrants have done good for his country.
I wouldn't want any of those rapists or sexual assaulters to be president or prime minister either.
I would like leaders with morals and integrity, I guess I'm a little old fashioned that way.
Tom: "Claiming incredulity is a pretty bad argument. Calling it "insane" or "ridiculous" is not a good argument at all."

TFES Wiki Occam's Razor page, by Tom: "What's the simplest explanation; that NASA has successfully designed and invented never before seen rocket technologies from scratch which can accelerate 100 tons of matter to an escape velocity of 7 miles per second"