Trump is not going to be storing the plane in a nonexistent structure when he leaves office. He is going to be keeping it, and the cowards whose job it is to hold him to account will once again just mumble about how much they disapprove.
Really? Why would he keep it when it can be a main feature of a major tourist destination dedicated to the Trump Presidency and further immortalize him? The museum would be a grander use for it. It is being given to the federally administered Trump library after his term because it will become a part of the Trump library. It's not too hard to understand.
A landmark... where? Because last I checked, Trump hasn't even made any comments on WHERE his presidential library will be, let alone began to build one.
There is a bill to
allow it to be built in Florida.
With this plane as a library feature exhibit it is going to help bring in millions of dollars in tourist revenue, not to mention notoriety. Ronald Regan's library makes 15M a year, and Trump's library will top this easily.
Not sure that's accurate. in 2020, they were losing $150,000 per week in revenue due to covid.
Which equates to $7.8 Million a year. Half of what you stated.
From Google AI:
>>ronald reagan museum yearly revenue
"The Ronald Reagan Presidential Library and Museum generated approximately $33.3 million in total revenue for the year ending September 30, 2023,
according to the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation & Institute."
They are making plenty of money.
So Trump can use one of these aging planes and not have one be built, which is scheduled to be completed in 2027?
He doesn't need to do that because one was given to his presidency as a gift, which will go on and serve as a US landmark and help bring in millions to US revenues. It was given to Trump, not any other president. Your proposal appears to be for him to reject it, and thus deny us money.
It absolutely makes sense. It's a free plane to the American taxpayer and is going to be used for decades as a United States landmark.
But how long will it be used as Air Force One?
Thing is, the cost isn't even the worst part. What sort of quid pro quo will Qatar expect in return for the "gift"? This is why the Emoluments Clause says that the President may not accept such "gifts" without congressional approval.
It's only a quid pro quo if there is a pro quo. For example, if you sent me a link to redeem a $1000 Amazon gift card to my DM as a gift I would happily keep it and assume that you truly just wanted to give me a generous gift. I would give you nothing in return except for a message of thanks.