In that link it gives possible reasons for a duplicate ballot and then claims without evidence that only one ballot was counted.
"while duplicate envelope images can occur, they only represent one ballot that will be counted."
That's zero evidence, just a statement. What kind of evidence is that?
Dr. Shiva, a paid expert consultant auditor with actual access to the materials and election computers argues that the invalid materials are being processed and counted, causing significant inaccuracies. Who's right?
That link also does not address the signatures. Why would a random sampling of the signatures suddenly become illegible after the election?
From the video Shiva says that invalid materials are getting approved and processed:
https://rumble.com/vmya6b-presentation-of-maricopa-county-audit-dr.-shiva-ayyadurai.htmlAt 36:31 he says that one voter sent in three duplicates with blank signature fields and two were approved:
There is clearly something funny going on if one voter can submit three copies of the materials with blank signatures, with two of them getting approved. Not a lot of quality control here.