Still no evidence that GPS uses anything other than satellites.
Or evidence that it has to use satellites. What a fun thread.
Note, I'm not arguing against the existence of
pseudolites. They are being investigated for various applications, such as in
Pseudolite Applications in Positioning and Navigation: Progress and Problemsand
Test Results of Local Area Augmentation of GPS With an In-Band Pseudolite - abstract only.
Since I have no idea of the properties of your non-satellite GPS stations I can only guess at the range.
This reference suggests a range about 150 km
China Satellite Navigation Conference (CSNC) 2013 Proceedings: Satellite . . . . . . .With Australia being roughly
3,000 km x 4,000 km, this would mean around
10 x 13 = 130 pseudolites to guarantee I could receive one anywhere in the country.
But, I can receive signals
up to 23 satellites when in a clear space.
Up to a half of these are GLONOSS and most of the rest the GPS Global Navigation System, so that would seem to need around
3,000 pseudolites, just to cover Australia.
If you have better information on the range of you non-satellite GPS stations we could comment more intelligently, but since it's all a big guess on your part that's the best I can do.
Of course you have no evidence that Australia (or anywhere else) has thousands of "pseudolites" or "ground stations" or whatever you suggest installed by Russia, USA and the EU, so over to you to make suggestions.
Keep dreaming. I'll keep to the simple model so I don't have to dream up excuses for numerous simple observations, like the appearance of sunrises, sunsets and lunar phases.
If it's fun models you want, why not try Terry Pratchett's "Discworld" series - at least his model "hangs together" - more or less!
Mind you if this is his "theory of creation:, he probably was a "big bang" adherent!
"
In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded."
Sir Terry Pratchett.