To prove my original premise I only needed this statement from you:
"Yes, I suspect I am more intelligent than certain people. I suspect certain people are stupid." (In the context and order you stated)
I have no earthly idea what your original premise was. You just started lambasting me for a relatively simple and straightforward comment, using some rather perplexing logic to try to argue... something about my intelligence... I have no idea what.
Whatever. Yes, I suspect I am smarter than some people. I suspect some people are not particularly smart. What's the issue?
I showed that Rama's papers and responses did not establish scientific justification for my facts.
I only remember you repeatedly denying a connection between love and reciprocal altruism. Please just read the post I linked to. It demonstrates how love can be developed by evolution. It is fully compatible with your aforementioned "facts" about love. It is fully compatible with sacrificial love. It is fully compatible with love not being strictly necessary for survival.
Your argument depends on love arising from evolution to be completely implausible. As long as I can provide a plausible scenario, your argument has nothing to stand on.
Please, not again! I went through your hypothetical story, most of it is symbiotic. The last part assumes science can determine good!
ben·e·fi·cial
ˌbenəˈfiSH(ə)l/
adjective
favorable or advantageous;
resulting in good."the beneficial effect on the economy"
synonyms: advantageous, favorable, helpful, useful, of use, of benefit, of assistance, valuable, of value, profitable, rewarding, gainful
"ladybugs and other species beneficial to the garden"
Beneficial is a relative term, like good.
If I take this pill will it be beneficial? Science can tell us the theory behind the chemical reaction in our bodies but it can't tell us if the result is beneficial or good. That's a product of human subjectivity. I feel 'good' from the pills I took.
Again,
Give me the science showing that man will die if he doesn't love. Give me the science to justify dying to save my loved one. I'm dead, no benefit to me, no material me (no science, science deals in the material only) and no ability for science to judge if my action is good for the group. You keep looking to evolution for your answer, I don't care what science you use but you haven't answered anything really.
R