[andruszkow]

Change, and move are two different things, uncertain one.

Do they clearly move? Do they clearly move as far as they should?

As viewed from 1,5 million kilometers, indeed.

[juner]

While I appreciate the in-depth discussion about alleged cloud movement on some random stitched together pictures, can we bring things back on topic?

I submitted the required forms. Just waiting to hear back from NASA about the badging process to get my credentials for the week I will be spending on site.

[TheTruthIsOnHere]

While I appreciate the in-depth discussion about alleged cloud movement on some random stitched together pictures, can we bring things back on topic?

I submitted the required forms. Just waiting to hear back from NASA about the badging process to get my credentials for the week I will be spending on site.

Hopefully you aren't on a black list and can actually get in lol

[Rounder]

Hopefully you aren't on a black list and can actually get in lol

Presumably 'Junker' is a TFES pseudonym and is not related to Junker's real life identity.

I wonder how they would react if they discover that a person who has a legitimate reason to be at a NASA facility was in fact a FE believer?  Would they still grant access and try to convince him or her of the RE position?  Or would they suspect the FE was up to some knd of "revealing the truth NASA doesn't want you to see" shenanigans and deny or revoke access?

In any case, Junker: I'm jealous, have fun!

[Thork]

Hopefully you aren't on a black list and can actually get in lol

Presumably 'Junker' is a TFES pseudonym and is not related to Junker's real life identity.

I wonder how they would react if they discover that a person who has a legitimate reason to be at a NASA facility was in fact a FE believer?  Would they still grant access and try to convince him or her of the RE position?  Or would they suspect the FE was up to some knd of "revealing the truth NASA doesn't want you to see" shenanigans and deny or revoke access?

In any case, Junker: I'm jealous, have fun!

I doubt he's going to do anything more serious that unblock the toilets. He's certainly not going there to work on Aurora or help reverse engineer some Roswell technology.

[Jura-Glenlivet]

It's all right I've told them, they are filling one of the empty storage bays with sand & rocks, and a gopher and marking it top secret.

[TheTruthIsOnHere]

Change, and move are two different things, uncertain one.

In this context 'cloud formations changing' and 'clouds moving' are pretty much the same thing.

Do they clearly move? Do they clearly move as far as they should?

Well, how far should they move? The period for the left hand gif is about 3-4 hours. It's a long distance view. I wouldn't expect to see significant movement. About as much as can be seen, in fact.

I'd say its closer to 5 or 6 hours.

http://weather.unisys.com/satellite/sat_vis.php?image=enh&inv=0&t=l12&region=he

Eventhough it's not drastic movement, or change... it is far more obvious than the photo animation in question, in particular the swirling clouds that never seem to, well, swirl. And the other gif animation we have looks about a thousand times different in terms of cloud movement, even appearance.

SORRY, LAST ONE JUNKER

[juner]

I wonder how they would react if they discover that a person who has a legitimate reason to be at a NASA facility was in fact a FE believer?  Would they still grant access and try to convince him or her of the RE position?  Or would they suspect the FE was up to some knd of "revealing the truth NASA doesn't want you to see" shenanigans and deny or revoke access?

We may find out. I am sure I will have too many drinks during one of the evening events and get too chatty about things.

In any case, Junker: I'm jealous, have fun!

Thanks! 

I doubt he's going to do anything more serious that unblock the toilets. He's certainly not going there to work on Aurora or help reverse engineer some Roswell technology.

Go back to selling software, or whatever it is that you do.

[Thork]

Go back to selling software, or whatever it is that you do.

I design SaaS platforms now. I'm a Product Director. 

I'd rather be a pron star or a famous sports star, but I'm getting a bit too old to do either of those.

[Jura-Glenlivet]

Did you go Junker?

[BlueMoon]

What are you even going to do there?  Whatever it is, I guess this is for the best.  It's time you realized just how real NASA is, as I already know.  They're not some sinister, ethereal "fork-tongued space agency" as you seem to think.  They are a benign facilitator of innovation and progress.  To go there and harass them, simply because you think you have evidence of a conspiracy, will earn you a solid right hook to the jaw.  Whether or not you actually get one, there's no justifying behavior like that. 

[juner]

Did you go Junker?

Not yet, it isn't for another couple of months.

What are you even going to do there?

Research.

It's time you realized just how real NASA is, as I already know.  They're not some sinister, ethereal "fork-tongued space agency" as you seem to think.

This seems like you are projecting your feelings on to me, friend. I am not sure where all of this came from or how you decided to come to this conclusion.

They are a benign facilitator of innovation and progress. 

I agree, they have made some cool stuff.

To go there and harass them, simply because you think you have evidence of a conspiracy, will earn you a solid right hook to the jaw. 
Whether or not you actually get one, there's no justifying behavior like that. 

What the hell is wrong with you? Does what you said even make sense to you when you go back and read it? I am going there to work and gain some valuable new experience. I've been invited, I am a guest. NASA is picking up most of the expenses, so I am certainly not going to "harass" anyone. It is pretty telling though that your response to criticism is physical assault. Good luck with that.

[BlueMoon]

Did you go Junker?

Not yet, it isn't for another couple of months.

What are you even going to do there?

Research.

It's time you realized just how real NASA is, as I already know.  They're not some sinister, ethereal "fork-tongued space agency" as you seem to think.

This seems like you are projecting your feelings on to me, friend. I am not sure where all of this came from or how you decided to come to this conclusion.

They are a benign facilitator of innovation and progress. 

I agree, they have made some cool stuff.

To go there and harass them, simply because you think you have evidence of a conspiracy, will earn you a solid right hook to the jaw. 
Whether or not you actually get one, there's no justifying behavior like that. 

What the hell is wrong with you? Does what you said even make sense to you when you go back and read it? I am going there to work and gain some valuable new experience. I've been invited, I am a guest. NASA is picking up most of the expenses, so I am certainly not going to "harass" anyone. It is pretty telling though that your response to criticism is physical assault. Good luck with that.

My apologies.  I was projecting Bart Sibrel, who decided to get a video of himself harassing Buzz Aldrin and got socked in the jaw for it. 
I'm not sure if you said already, but where are you going? 

[juner]

NASA Ames Research Center.

[Pongo]

NASA Ames Research Center.

I have it on strong authority that a leading flat-earth proponent has already infiltrated this facility.