If you believe that we have accurately measured the "life span" of the Sun then you have to address the point sandokhan brought up earlier in this thread. We can only postulate, theorize, hypothesize how the sun works from here on Earth, supposedly 93 million miles away. By the way, if gravity is as powerful as it is on the sun, and it bends light and somehow can hold radiation back, then how is that the Earth gets any sunlight or UV radiation from the sun?
I don't
"have to address the point sandokhan brought up" or anything else!
We can do quite a lot of postulating, theorizing and hypothesizing how the sun works from here on Earth with spectral analysis and analysis or sun particles emitted, but I'm not going to get into that discussion! What's not point?
Wherever did you get
"if gravity is as powerful as it is on the sun, and it bends light" from? Another Youtube video?
Yes,
gravitation fields can bend light, but
A ray of light nicking the edge of the sun, for example, would bend a minuscule 1.75 arcseconds — the angle made by a right triangle 1 inch high and 1.9 miles long.
from:
http://www.wired.com/2009/05/dayintech_0529/Yes, the amount of bending for even the sun's mass is miniscule!
Then "somehow can hold radiation back". This gets wierder and wierder!
You try to ridicule the Heliocentric Globe Earth, yet you will never face the
massive problems any Flat Earth hypothesis has in explaining moon phases, sun rise times and directions, six month sun at the South Pole, 24 hour sun over almost all of Antarctica at the south summer equinox and on and on!
Really I am not interested in discussion your imagined problems with a globe until you have some viable alternative.
And, you simply do not!