Fixed to reflect what Trump actually said, and yes, the difference is pretty clear. Trump's language is far more extreme, as it always is, because the man lives and breathes hyperbole. That's arguably been one of his key strengths of his campaign. There's no sense in downplaying it. And Hillary's quote is from almost a year ago (for an extra dose of irony, the same Washington Post you allege is part of the anti-Trump/call-Trump-Hitler conspiracy called Hillary out for that line and defended Trump). Don't you have anything more recent?
Trump isn't actively trying to compare Hillary to Hitler. There's only one man on the planet that killed 11 million people primarily using boxcars to shuffle them around, Saddam. I'll let you take a few minutes to think on who that man is.
Trump is saying Hillary is dangerous, corrupt, warmongering, etc. That's bad, yes, but it's a far cry from making comparisons between her and what is possibly the most evil man to have ever lived.
You rejected this, of course. No, Trump has never said "Whites > blacks" and therefore any sign of racism from him is in the eye of the beholder. Hillary is responsible for everything she implies and insinuates, but how dare you read anything into Trump's words no you're the real racist. Oh, and here's a gem from the very entertaining response (I want to say it's half-capeshit villain, half-Bond villain) you wrote to that post:
"You said my [completely different] argument earlier was nonsense, therefore you're being a hypocrite when you say my argument is nonsense now!"
Saddam, even if this were true, arguing that I'm a hypocrite isn't an argument at all. If a smoker tells someone "don't smoke, it's bad for you" does that now mean smoking must be good for you?
And yet here you are complaining about morality and feels. Getting soft on us, Rushy? This is the real world, and hard, logical effects are what's important, not your romantic sentimentalism. Having Trump killed is the surest way of guaranteeing that he'll never sit in the Oval Office, so why bother criticizing Hillary for sending assassins after him? She's just trying to get shit done! And wouldn't it be hilarious (Hillarious?) if Trump really was assassinated? Talk about a yuge, yuge cucking for his fans! You've talked before about watching the spiraling despair of Bernie's fans on reddit as it became more and more obvious that he had lost. I bet that would be nothing compared to the mass suicides being planned on r/TheDonald.
This is probably one of the most cringeworthy things you've ever posted.
That was a fucking joke, Rushy. Did you seriously think it was "accidental"?
Propaganda under the guise of comedy is still propaganda. Jon Stewart, John Oliver, Stephen Colbert, etc. spend their entire lives peddling propaganda to their audience. There have been many, many studies to the effect (e.g.
this sociology paper) showing that humor is extremely effective as a persuasion technique. The combination of humor and "news" contributes to thousands of people who genuinely believe these comedians are good sources of information.
Colbert hilariously compared Trump to Hitler. Now when you think of Hitler/Swastikas, your mind brings up Trump. That's not an accident. These are men who educate themselves in the psychology of an audience. They do what they do very much on purpose, much as anyone else does. Make people laugh, trust you, and then slip in some manipulation along the line. No big deal, right?