> Multiple people around the Hillary campaign die mysteriously, appearing to benefit her. Nothing to see here.
Oh, come on, you can't say something like this and not back it up. Who died, how were their deaths mysterious, and how did they benefit Hillary?
The DNC's IT director was killed on the street in an apparent mugging, but nothing was stolen:
http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Man-Shot-Killed-in-Northwest-DC-386316391.html
Julian Assange later indicated that this is the man who leaked the DNC emails to him.
This is the most prominent one. There are five other staffers who were killed in various other ways, but this one is the most interesting because the suspect tied Seth Rich up and shot him in the back multiple times.
Nothing in the article said he was tied up. Or did I miss something?
Also, why have him killed?
And why do a poor job at attempted robbery assassination?
Basically:
If Clinton found out and had him killed, it was out of vengence and warning for others, not to protect secrets.
If Clinton had him killed, why did the hitman not follow through with the robbery to make it look legit? And why give him the chance to fight back? You're a hitman, you kill people. You don't want to make it a scuffle.
The damage was done. Killing him only causes more issues. Better to smear his name instead, discredit him and thus have a rationale to discredit any emails that surface.