A couple of days ago a Minuteman III was launched from Vandenburg, possibly as a demonstration of American power in this time of conflict around the world. They have been testing ICBMs since the 1960s and the internet says there have been multiple instrumented test ranges to see where they splashed down. They have used radar, a grid of undersea microphones, and currently gps and radio transmitter on the missile. Physicists/mathemiticians calculate the theoretical landing site. The scientists/military/government say that this is all consistent, the equations work and the missiles land where they are supposed to. This is all said to be based on the globe map and RE physics and equations.
Even over the range of missiles in current use in the middle east. If the earth is flat, the targets hundreds of miles away are in very different places than if the earth is round. I submit that it is impossible to accurately target a missile over hundreds, even thousands of miles if you are using the wrong map.
Do they think the earth is round or flat? If they are using the wrong map and equations, how do they hit where they aim? If they don't hit where they aim, are countries all over the world faking the ability and the danger? Are there thousands people who work on this in multiple countries who know the earth is flat? Do they have a flat earth map? If they do, can we get it and put it in the wiki and delete the current ones? If they don't, how are they hitting their targets?
Suggested explanation: Yes, they shoot rockets and hit where they aim and think that the earth is round BUT there are forces bending things so that their untrue assumptions about the shape of earth still result in consistency with their observations. If asked about evidence or equations for this, make up a name for the force like "Ballistic Acceleration". Of course there is no observational evidence math equations, but there are none for Universal Acceleration or Electromagnetic Acceleration, so apparently that's not a deal breaker.