[Action80]

It is called "ELECTION DAY,"

You cast your ballot IN PERSON

Well this is going to blow your mind...

https://www.usa.gov/early-voting

My mind is blown that we got to the point of allowing this kind of whatinthefuckistan type of bullshit in the first place.

People who want this kind of approach in terms of "fair elections," are, in fact, the ones who are practicing unfair shit.

Again. the words "ELECTION DAY," ring pretty loud.

Yeah, fuck military folk!  They should never be allowed to vote.  Or people who work alot.
Or the disabled.
We should probably ban non-property owners too.

Nobody said "fuck military folk."

Nobody said people who "work alot."

Nobody said anything about banning "non-property owners."

Except you, of course...easily the most prominent citizen of Whatinthefuckistan to post in this forum.

[AATW]

My level of evidence in the nuclear bomb thread is virtually the same as my level of evidence here.

Correct. In neither thread have you presented any evidence for your assertions.

It's called consistency

You are consistent in that you dismiss or call fake any evidence which doesn't confirm what you've already decided to believe while providing no evidence for your own assertions.
How you arrive at your decisions about what to believe remains a mystery for the ages.

Just google '2020 presidential election'. The evidence is self-evident.

Do you even know how Google works? If I Google something I'm not going to get the same results you do. Google tailors its results to the individual depending on past searches, interests etc. If there's some super-compelling evidence you want me to look at you're going to have to post it.

Well, yes, obviously. Asking her mother or friends if she is correct is quite blatantly nonsense.

Yeah. Asking people who actually know her to corroborate makes no sense at all. Better to ask random people who have never met her.

You knew that the moment you posted it, but chose to post it anyway.

Obviously I knew you'd dismiss it out of hand, that's how you roll.
And I actually chose NOT to post it. You asked for reasonable evidence and I said there's no point as you'd just dismiss it if it didn't say what you wanted.
I posted it to demonstrate that which you now have.

Surely we can expect our presidential candidates to have some form of evidence beyond "ask my mommy"?

Well that depends on what you're asking for evidence of. If it's of having a job at college 40 years ago it's pretty obvious that's going to be hard to evidence.
Asking people who knew her at that time is probably the best you're going to get.
Your opinion about this is based on gut feeling and your general distrust of Harris. Which is fairly reasonable in this case, it's a hard claim to either prove or falsify.
Just stop pretending you care about evidence when you clearly don't.

[AATW]

People who want this kind of approach in terms of "fair elections," are, in fact, the ones who are practicing unfair shit.

Why is this unfair? You don't get to vote before the day AND on the day. You just vote at a different time - just like you do with a postal vote.
Why does that actually matter?  Are you going to change your mind about who to vote for before election day? If not then why does it matter exactly when you vote?
You can keep putting ELECTION DAY in all caps if you like, but other than spluttering with rage for some unspecified reason you haven't actually explained what your issue with it is.

[Action80]

People who want this kind of approach in terms of "fair elections," are, in fact, the ones who are practicing unfair shit.

Why is this unfair? You don't get to vote before the day AND on the day. You just vote at a different time - just like you do with a postal vote.
Why does that actually matter?  Are you going to change your mind about who to vote for before election day? If not then why does it matter exactly when you vote?
You can keep putting ELECTION DAY in all caps if you like, but other than spluttering with rage for some unspecified reason you haven't actually explained what your issue with it is.

^The other resident citizen of whatinthefuckistan chimes in, declaring every day is ELECTION DAY.

GTFO with your bs.

[Pete Svarrior]

I don't see a link anywhere in this post because, unsurprisingly, you found no supporting evidence for any of the points you have made.

Actually, I have provided links for the points I've made, and you even thanked me once for steering your straight. It's the points I haven't made that you're struggling with.

Such a shame that you weren't able to even highlight what you think you're responding to. I guess I have no choice but to accept that you were wrong on every point I've contested, since you're not counter-arguing, and therefore tacitly conceding.

Since your memory seems to be playing tricks on you, don't forget: in a week's time, it's Jizz for Jill!

[Lord Dave]

It is called "ELECTION DAY,"

You cast your ballot IN PERSON

Well this is going to blow your mind...

https://www.usa.gov/early-voting

My mind is blown that we got to the point of allowing this kind of whatinthefuckistan type of bullshit in the first place.

People who want this kind of approach in terms of "fair elections," are, in fact, the ones who are practicing unfair shit.

Again. the words "ELECTION DAY," ring pretty loud.

Yeah, fuck military folk!  They should never be allowed to vote.  Or people who work alot.
Or the disabled.
We should probably ban non-property owners too.

Nobody said "fuck military folk."

Nobody said people who "work alot."

Nobody said anything about banning "non-property owners."

Except you, of course...easily the most prominent citizen of Whatinthefuckistan to post in this forum.

You did.
How, exactly, is a solider deployed outside of their voting district, going to go to their voting district on election day and vote?

[Action80]

Kindly point to the post where I wrote, "fuck military people."

[Lord Dave]

Kindly point to the post where I wrote, "fuck military people."

You didn't, specifically.  But that was your general concept.  Anyone not able to physically go to their voting area should not be allowed to vote.

I merely condensed it into something you'd read.

[Action80]

Kindly point to the post where I wrote, "fuck military people."

You didn't, specifically.  But that was your general concept.  Anyone not able to physically go to their voting area should not be allowed to vote.

I merely condensed it into something you'd read.

You are correct. I didn't specifically write that.

Because none of what I wrote indicates "military people," or any other group would be deprived of their right to vote.

None of the current bullshit way of early voting is designed to ensure the right of "military persons," to vote.

That is just some more "THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!" shit you threw against the wall.

[Lord Dave]

Kindly point to the post where I wrote, "fuck military people."

You didn't, specifically.  But that was your general concept.  Anyone not able to physically go to their voting area should not be allowed to vote.

I merely condensed it into something you'd read.

You are correct. I didn't specifically write that.

Because none of what I wrote indicates "military people," or any other group would be deprived of their right to vote.

None of the current bullshit way of early voting is designed to ensure the right of "military persons," to vote.

That is just some more "THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!" shit you threw against the wall.

Ok.  So...

You cast your ballot IN PERSON, presenting a valid photo ID.

One person, one vote.

If it turns out you can't vote for "reasons," too bad, too sad.

Perhaps you should clarify what isn't "reasons".  Or what you define as IN PERSON because if you can't go to your voting district, how does one vote in person?  Or do you mean any location is fine to vote from?

[Action80]

Timeline:

You post some article about ballot boxes being blown up...where?...here in the US...

I post a response stating these stupid incidents occurring in the US are actually a great argument for ELECTION DAY being just that. ELECTION DAY...one person, one ID, one vote...Nothing about anyone being deprived of their right to vote.

You post the typical "THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!" claptrap response.

None of what you originally posted has anything to do with "in-person voting."

I didn't write anything about doing away with the rights of eligible persons living outside of the US to cast a vote in the manner in which they have done so in past elections.

I simply wrote the truth...it is the "THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!", cult (of which you are a card-carrying member) that enacted this bullshit approach to "free and fair elections," that result in stories like you referenced in the first place.

Spare yourself further embarrassment and take a break from the forums.

[Rushy]

Correct. In neither thread have you presented any evidence for your assertions.

That you still think I need to provide evidence of simply stating "x didn't happen/x didn't exist" continues to be your problem, not mine.

Do you even know how Google works? If I Google something I'm not going to get the same results you do. Google tailors its results to the individual depending on past searches, interests etc. If there's some super-compelling evidence you want me to look at you're going to have to post it.

"No, I don't want to do that, it's too hard " Always an excuse, isn't there?

Yeah. Asking people who actually know her to corroborate makes no sense at all. Better to ask random people who have never met her.

Yes, when it comes to saying things that aren't egregiously biased in her favor, that is the correct thing to do.

Well that depends on what you're asking for evidence of. If it's of having a job at college 40 years ago it's pretty obvious that's going to be hard to evidence.
Asking people who knew her at that time is probably the best you're going to get.
Your opinion about this is based on gut feeling and your general distrust of Harris. Which is fairly reasonable in this case, it's a hard claim to either prove or falsify.
Just stop pretending you care about evidence when you clearly don't.

How can we establish how much I care about evidence if you insist on never posting any?

Actually, I have provided links for the points I've made, and you even thanked me once for steering your straight. It's the points I haven't made that you're struggling with.

Such a shame that you weren't able to even highlight what you think you're responding to. I guess I have no choice but to accept that you were wrong on every point I've contested, since you're not counter-arguing, and therefore tacitly conceding.

Since your memory seems to be playing tricks on you, don't forget: in a week's time, it's Jizz for Jill!

Oddly, there's no links in this post, either. It's almost like evidence of what you've been saying doesn't exist! Sad!

[Lord Dave]

Timeline:

You post some article about ballot boxes being blown up...where?...here in the US...

I post a response stating these stupid incidents occurring in the US are actually a great argument for ELECTION DAY being just that. ELECTION DAY...one person, one ID, one vote...Nothing about anyone being deprived of their right to vote.

You post the typical "THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!" claptrap response.

None of what you originally posted has anything to do with "in-person voting."

I didn't write anything about doing away with the rights of eligible persons living outside of the US to cast a vote in the manner in which they have done so in past elections.

I simply wrote the truth...it is the "THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!", cult (of which you are a card-carrying member) that enacted this bullshit approach to "free and fair elections," that result in stories like you referenced in the first place.

Spare yourself further embarrassment and take a break from the forums.

Ok so if mail in voting for people outside the US is ok, why isn't it ok for people INSIDE the US?

[Action80]

Ok so if mail in voting for people outside the US is ok, why isn't it ok for people INSIDE the US?

LMMFAO!!!

Look at the example you provided for why it isn't ok.

[Lord Dave]

Ok so if mail in voting for people outside the US is ok, why isn't it ok for people INSIDE the US?

LMMFAO!!!

Look at the example you provided for why it isn't ok.

So you don't know.  Gotcha.

[Action80]

Ok so if mail in voting for people outside the US is ok, why isn't it ok for people INSIDE the US?

LMMFAO!!!

Look at the example you provided for why it isn't ok.

So you don't know.  Gotcha.Look, I realize I posted an article about ballot boxes and mail-in ballots getting blown up and destroyed and I wanted to include that I feel this is unjust and unfair for these ballots to not be counted, even though there is no real way for anyone to possibly know the ones that were destroyed were filed legitimately by eligible voters, according to US law.

Fixed your post for you. Simply adding 100 percent reality to a situation where I fully understand you would be unable to do so.

[Lord Dave]

Ok so if mail in voting for people outside the US is ok, why isn't it ok for people INSIDE the US?

LMMFAO!!!

Look at the example you provided for why it isn't ok.

So you don't know.  Gotcha.Look, I realize I posted an article about ballot boxes and mail-in ballots getting blown up and destroyed and I wanted to include that I feel this is unjust and unfair for these ballots to not be counted, even though there is no real way for anyone to possibly know the ones that were destroyed were filed legitimately by eligible voters, according to US law.

Fixed your post for you. Simply adding 100 percent reality to a situation where I fully understand you would be unable to do so.

You mean to tell me that its impossible to know if a ballot was real or not after it's been destroyed beyond reading?  Wow!  Your powers of deduction are fucking amazing.

Good thing they're asking those people who might be impacted to vote again.

[Action80]

Ok so if mail in voting for people outside the US is ok, why isn't it ok for people INSIDE the US?

LMMFAO!!!

Look at the example you provided for why it isn't ok.

So you don't know.  Gotcha.Look, I realize I posted an article about ballot boxes and mail-in ballots getting blown up and destroyed and I wanted to include that I feel this is unjust and unfair for these ballots to not be counted, even though there is no real way for anyone to possibly know the ones that were destroyed were filed legitimately by eligible voters, according to US law.

Fixed your post for you. Simply adding 100 percent reality to a situation where I fully understand you would be unable to do so.

You mean to tell me that its impossible to know if a ballot was real or not after it's been destroyed beyond reading?  Wow!  Your powers of deduction are fucking amazing.

Good thing they're asking those people who might be impacted to vote again.

"Might be impacted..." the meaning of words are lost on you and so is the necessity of evidence in ensuring "free and fair elections."

If you were in that area and claimed you had placed a ballot in a box that was blown up, I wouldn't fucking believe it all.

[Lord Dave]

Ok so if mail in voting for people outside the US is ok, why isn't it ok for people INSIDE the US?

LMMFAO!!!

Look at the example you provided for why it isn't ok.

So you don't know.  Gotcha.Look, I realize I posted an article about ballot boxes and mail-in ballots getting blown up and destroyed and I wanted to include that I feel this is unjust and unfair for these ballots to not be counted, even though there is no real way for anyone to possibly know the ones that were destroyed were filed legitimately by eligible voters, according to US law.

Fixed your post for you. Simply adding 100 percent reality to a situation where I fully understand you would be unable to do so.

You mean to tell me that its impossible to know if a ballot was real or not after it's been destroyed beyond reading?  Wow!  Your powers of deduction are fucking amazing.

Good thing they're asking those people who might be impacted to vote again.

"Might be impacted..." the meaning of words are lost on you and so is the necessity of evidence in ensuring "free and fair elections."

If you were in that area and claimed you had placed a ballot in a box that was blown up, I wouldn't fucking believe it all.

Might be impacted is fairly easy to understand.
Not everyone who voted early, voted in that box.  Nor at the time their ballot would be there.  So "might be impacted" was correct.  And by impacted ai mean their constitutional right to vote being impacted. 

[Action80]

^ITT, LD champions the cause of "vote early, vote often!"

Truly the rallying cry of democracy!

GTFO with your bullshit.