The OP stated that Round Earth is bound by gravity.
And I explained very early on that this is not the case.
If you still believe that I am veering off topic then please correct me.
I did so twice.
The traditional theory of gravitation is incompatible with the Flat Earth Model.
This is incorrect.
At least this is what is written in the wiki on Universal Acceleration.
Not true. It sounds like you only read the lede of the article, and thus ended up with an overly simplistic understanding of the subject.
Therefore the mechanism by which the Earth maintains its shape under FE is not stated and needs to be defined.
Even if your assumptions held (they don't), this "need" would not logically follow.
Regarding the use of terms gravity and gravitation, in my native language there is only one word that covers both. Therefore it is very difficult for me to understand the difference between the two.
The difference is crucial for this discussion. Gravity is a phenomenon specific to the Earth, which you could simply describe as "things fall". Think F=mg, where g is roughly 9.8ms
-2.
Gravitation is the supposed mechanism of attraction between all mass. Think F=Gm
1m
2x
-2Generally, you will find no FE'ers who will disagree with you that things fall. You are, however, likely to find ones who dispute the magnitude of gravitation, or, more rarely, its existence at all.