*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 30
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
New model of the Universe.
« on: February 04, 2021, 09:37:10 AM »
Formation of continents.

Take a close look at the animation of two huge, diametrically opposed formations on the surface of the earth’s core. They cannot but be directly related to the formation of continents. They are both biased to the same direction (east). Continents are displaced from them to the east. Compare with the official model for the formation of continents. These huge structures are contrary to the official model of the formation of continents.



Link to the source article about Earth Blobs: https://eos.org/features/the-unsolved-mystery-of-the-earth-blobs

The Cordillera – the Andes, the Iranian highlands – the Himalayas – are also two huge formations of a similar shape, also diametrically opposed to each other. Both are displaced to the east of two huge formations of the Earth’s core (HFEC). Cordillera – The Andes are displaced further from their HFEC and are more split. Iranian Highlands – The Himalayas are closer to their HFEC, and are strongly displaced to the north.



New model of the Universe.

From the above, we can conclude that before the moment of the so-called “Big Bang” in the Universe there was a certain material sphere with a diameter of about 20 thousand km, the substance in which was in the stage of the limit of density (the state of singularity). Let’s call this sphere ProtoEarth.



As a result of certain processes at the Proto-Earth’s poles two PreContinents were gradually formed – PreAmerica (North America, South America and Antarctica) and PreEurasia (Africa, Eurasia and Australia), in the centers of which the Sun and the Moon were gradually formed. Parallel to this, water was formed in a wide strip of the proto-Earth’s equator as a result of certain processes. At a certain moment, a critical mass difference accumulated at the poles, the equilibrium of the system was violated, the separation of the Sun and the Moon began, the proto-Earth’s axis of rotation shifted from conditional zero degrees to the current 23.5 degrees, and the formation of modern continents.

(a huge trail of clearly cosmic origin between South America and Antarctica, animation of the trajectory of a solar eclipse shadow and a schematic drawing)

A few more arguments in favor of this model of the Universe:

- The coincidence of the apparent diameters of the Sun and the Moon in the sky.
- The coincidence of the axial periods of rotation of the Sun and the Moon (27 days).
- Only Mercury and Venus have no satellites.
- Only Mercury and Venus have incommensurably large periods of rotation around their axes 58 and 243 days, respectively (Earth, Mars – 1 day; Jupiter, Saturn – 16, 17 hours; Uranus, Neptune – 9, 10 hours).
- In each lower conjunction (that is, during the closest approach to the Earth) Venus is facing the Earth by the same side.


(schematic comparison of the official and new model of the Universe; ProtoEarth, Moon, Sun, Venus, Mercury, Mars and common center of masses between Earth and Sun)

Thus, it is very similar to the fact that the Universe looks approximately like on the Tycho Brahe's model of the Universe, only with the correction for the rotation of the Earth and the Sun around the common center of mass. The Oort cloud is the border of the Universe, where all the “stars” and “galaxies” formed from the proto-Earth mantle, with diameters not exceeding several tens of kilometers, are located. The diameter of the universe, presumably, does not exceed one light minute.



In all this, a correct understanding of the rotation of the Earth and the Sun around a common center of mass is very important. The ratio of diameters is approximately the same as in the animation (the Earth is larger, the Sun is smaller).



Addition.

The rotation of Venus around the Sun is very similar to the rotation of the Moon around the Earth, except for the direction of rotation. That is, Venus is not always facing the Sun with one side, but in each lower conjunction (that is, during the closest approach to the Earth) Venus is facing the Earth by the same side. As you can see from the quote above, in the official model of the solar system there is no explanation for such an orbital phenomenon of Venus, because it can in no way be a coincidence or the result of the tidal interaction of the Earth and Venus (at least with the official parameters of the solar system).

The paradox here most likely lies in the misunderstanding of the reference point (coordinate system). When calculating the orbital rotation period of the planet (in this case, Venus), the immobility of the Sun and the rotation of the Earth around it are taken into account, and therefore the paradox of the mismatch of the orbital and axial rotation periods of Venus (225 and 243 days) and the fact that “in each lower conjunction (that is, during the closest approach to the Earth) Venus faces the Earth with the same side.”

The answer to this paradox, most likely, is that it is not the Earth that revolves around the Sun, but the Earth and the Sun revolve around a common center of mass, and then the officially paradoxical coincidence of the orbital and axial periods of Venus’s rotation becomes quite natural. But since the convergence of the Earth and Venus occurs approximately once every one and a half years, the orbital period of Venus is 584 days (the synodic period of Venus), and the axial period relative to the Earth is 146 days (that is, exactly four times less). This is difficult for a spatial representation (especially considering the massive brainwashing with the official model of the solar system), but when the Earth and the Sun rotate around a common center of mass, this is quite possible, does not contradict visual observations of the movement of the planets and the Sun in the sky, and most importantly, this explains the fact that in each lower conjunction (that is, during the closest approach to the Earth) Venus is facing the Earth by the same side.


Two animations for better spatial presentation. On the second – the rotation of the Earth and the Sun around the common center of mass (the Earth is larger, the Sun is smaller).
« Last Edit: February 04, 2021, 07:32:49 PM by AlexandrKushnirtshuk »
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk

*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 30
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2021, 09:48:15 AM »
My assumptions according probable distortions in official cosmic calculations.
All celestial, orbital, trigonometrical, mathematical calculations may have (and looks like it is so) one specific feature. They all relatively correct. Look attentively what I mean. Such basic parameters as: distance, size and velocity - they are highly interconnected and directly interdependent. Only one coefficient in calculations directly affects the change in these three parameters, in one direction or another. The mathematical concept may be correct, but the scale of the official model of the Universe is greatly oversized, that is, space velocities, distances and sizes are greatly oversized. But this does not affect the proportions of the orbits in any way. Therefore, even though the scale is greatly oversized, spacecrafts can fly (and they do) in the space of the Solar System. Proportions are correct, scale is wrong, calculations are relatively correct (just because of one incorrect coefficient* in calculations, which directly affects to the calculated cosmic: distances, sizes and velocities).
* that incorrect coefficient may be the gravitational constant.
"The gravitational constant is a physical constant that is difficult to measure with high accuracy." (Wikipedia)
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk

*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 30
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2021, 10:02:58 AM »
What could be the plans for the colonization of Mars, if there is almost no atmosphere to protect from meteorites and the entire surface is strewn with craters from them? Why is there no meteorite hit in any photograph "from Mars"? Because “photographs from Mars” are taken on Earth. The diameter of Mars is about 14 km.

NASA BUSTED CURIOSITY ROVER NOT ON MARS BUT GREENLAND


NASA - Mars VS Devon Island



1) If the diameter of Mars is 6 779 km, then its colonization is meaningless due to the too thin atmosphere, that is, the lack of protection from meteorites.
2) But the diameter of Mars is about 14 km, and its colonization is impossible in principle.

Look closely at the scale of the relief, the number of objects on the surface. Four volcanoes and a huge half-planet canyon with a diameter of 6,779 km.? The four mountains on Mars are the remnants of the outer shell. A huge canyon (Mariner Valley) - a crack in the inner shell. The entire relief is clearly visible in one small photo. The diameter of Mars is about 14 km. Venus ~ 24 km. Mercury ~ 10 km.


Scale comparison of satellite photos of Earth and Mars shows that Mars' scale is greatly oversized.
« Last Edit: February 04, 2021, 07:18:08 PM by AlexandrKushnirtshuk »
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk

*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 30
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2021, 10:17:51 AM »
Strange correlation between Betelgeuse brightness and solar activity.

Betelgeuse is estimated to be 642.5 light years away. Why is dynamics of brightness of Betelgeuse so closely aligned with the dynamics of solar activity?


Diagram source link: https://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/couldnt-sun-be-cause-global-warming


Diagram source link: https://skyandtelescope.org/observing/fainting-betelgeuse/

Moreover, in addition to the correlation with 10-13 years solar cycles on the Betelgeuse brightness graph, there are clear 1 year cycles of brightness fluctuations also visible. Based on this fact, I assume that Betelgeuse, like all other "stars" and "galaxies", are located in the Oort Cloud and reflect sunlight.

Annual cyclicity of Betelgeuse brightness fluctuations.

The annual cyclical fluctuations in the brightness of Betelgeuse can be explained by the suggestion that in December the Sun is farther from it, and in June - is closer to it (considering the rotation of the Earth and the Sun as in the animation below, the Earth is larger). Betelgeuse is located in the constellation Orion. Sun in Orion (Orion behind Sun) is in June.

« Last Edit: February 04, 2021, 07:22:00 PM by AlexandrKushnirtshuk »
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk

Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2021, 04:02:18 AM »
Great stuff Alexander.  Heres a few thoughts.

Betelgeuse - the correlation you found between the suns light flares and betelgeuses flares is great.  I also believe betelgeuse is within our steller neighborhood of planets and nebulas.

I think its funny Nasa is on the outer edges of the world conducting star trek experiments, but I don't think there shooting films for public use (id need more evidense), but again, the photos Greenland versus Mars are the same so Id need an explanation.

I also agree that the distance and size of objects in space  are greatly exaggerated.   I think the Milky Way is a few times larger then earth and it creates dwarf galaxies like earth (which in real size is the same size as we can measure today using cars and aircraft etc..)

I don't really agree that the earth and sun circle another object.   I think the earth is at the center of our "galaxy" so to speak and it's surrounded by the oort cloud which produces planets.   Only large galaxy's like the milky way make galaxies.

The half-lifes of sound and light particles you mentioned was cool. 

So you think the earth is round btw?  And spinning?  Your ideas fall in the middle of mainstream flat earth beliefs and round earth beliefs,  the same as me.
Is the Earth flat and sky is round?  Or is the Earth round and the sky flat?

*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 30
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #5 on: February 05, 2021, 11:04:10 AM »
I don't really agree that the earth and sun circle another object.   I think the earth is at the center of our "galaxy" so to speak and it's surrounded by the oort cloud which produces planets.   Only large galaxy's like the milky way make galaxies.
1) Researchers Have Identified 100 Mysteriously Disappeared Stars in The Night Sky
https://www.sciencealert.com/a-look-through-past-star-catalogues-finds-scores-of-stars-that-have-mysteriously-vanished
2) ‘Missing’ supermassive black hole in distant galaxy leaves scientists perplexed
https://theprint.in/scientifix/missing-supermassive-black-hole-in-distant-galaxy-leaves-scientists-perplexed/570365/

Oort Cloud is the border of the Universe, were all "stars" and "galaxies" are located.
Earth is the only planet. Sun is the only star in the Universe.


All objects of the Universe were formed from ProtoEarth (its core and mantle) - spherical volume of matter with a diameter of about 20 thousand kilometers compressed to the density limit. This is one of the transformation stages of the Universe during its infinite (in time) existence.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2021, 11:14:12 AM by AlexandrKushnirtshuk »
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk

*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 30
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #6 on: February 05, 2021, 11:36:25 AM »
The essence of the Flat Earth Theory is that there is nothing to do in space and there is nothing to colonize there. World space agencies are wasting huge resources of money, effort and time. My model of the Universe proves this reasonably, consistently, factually, logically, with all the necessary evidence - that is, completely scientifically.
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk

*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 30
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #7 on: February 05, 2021, 01:47:36 PM »
If the diameter of the Sun is 1.4 million km, then the object that flew into the Sun on October 1, 2011 should be no less than the Moon, but astronomers could not help but notice a new object of this size in the Solar System. My rough estimations: Moon diameter ~ 500-700 km.; Sun diameter ~ 2500-3000 km.


Link to SOHO Lasco C2 and C3 image archive: https://soho.nascom.nasa.gov/data/Theater/

This is Moon's trail on the Earth's surface which shows approximate size of the Moon.

(a huge trail of clearly cosmic origin between South America and Antarctica, animation of the trajectory of a solar eclipse shadow and a schematic drawing)
« Last Edit: February 05, 2021, 02:00:26 PM by AlexandrKushnirtshuk »
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk

*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 30
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #8 on: February 05, 2021, 02:06:58 PM »
Why in the SDO satellite photo, the Moon has a clear (not defocused) outline, given the fact that the camera is clearly focused on the Sun (the surface structure is clearly visible), and the “fact” that the Sun is officially 400 times farther than the Moon? This is also because the Moon has no atmosphere, but with a distance difference of 400 times and a clear focus on the Sun's surface, the Moon's contour cannot be as clear as in that SDO photo.
My rough estimations: distance to the Moon is about 100 000 km.; distance to the Sun is about 300 000 km.
So I think that the Sun is actually about 3 times farther and bigger than the Moon.

Link to SDO images archive: https://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk

Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #9 on: February 05, 2021, 03:32:06 PM »
I also think the moon and sun are similar in size.   In fact, I think the moon was once a sun too.  Binary (or two) star systems are very common. 

https://physicsworld.com/a/planet-forming-stream-found-in-binary-star-system/

This may lend weight to your arguments of two suns, moons, and common orbits.
Is the Earth flat and sky is round?  Or is the Earth round and the sky flat?

*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 30
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #10 on: February 08, 2021, 12:14:27 PM »
Traces of the Sun and Moon on the Earth's surface.
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk

*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 30
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #11 on: February 09, 2021, 12:09:14 PM »
Anomalous region of the Sun. Moreover, this happens there when it is spring on Earth (in the northern hemisphere), or so (as now it is almost spring). That is, this process on the surface of the Sun is influenced by the seasonal position of the Earth (Earth's axis + magnetic field) relative to the Sun, which is impossible with the official sizes of the Earth and the Sun.

Link to SDO photo and animation archive:
https://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/aiahmi/



Link to video with an overview of this anomaly.
Today, Found The Big Sphere Suck The Flames of Our Sun Like Akhenaten With Aten, Egyptian Sun God
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk

*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 30
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #12 on: February 10, 2021, 11:39:12 PM »
Official diameter of Mercury is 4.8 thousand km, Moon - 3.5 thousand km.
Look at large craters with long, light streaks.
Stripes from one of such craters on Mercury cover (encircle) it completely. The Moon also has several such craters with long light stripes, but they are much smaller (shorter) relative to the Moon's surface.
Moon's diameter is about 500-700 km. The diameter of Mercury is about 10 km.
« Last Edit: February 10, 2021, 11:41:26 PM by AlexandrKushnirtshuk »
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk

*

Offline stack

  • *
  • Posts: 1940
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #13 on: February 11, 2021, 12:09:41 AM »
Official diameter of Mercury is 4.8 thousand km, Moon - 3.5 thousand km.
Look at large craters with long, light streaks.
Stripes from one of such craters on Mercury cover (encircle) it completely. The Moon also has several such craters with long light stripes, but they are much smaller (shorter) relative to the Moon's surface.
Moon's diameter is about 500-700 km. The diameter of Mercury is about 10 km.


What do the craters and stripes have to do with the size of Mercury & the Moon?

*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 30
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #14 on: February 14, 2021, 02:54:04 AM »
The animation is large (3.5 MB). Optimized it as far as possible.

Link to STEREO archive: https://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/images
The stationary object slightly to the right of the center is the Earth (according to NASA). In addition to the Earth, only two dwarf planets Haumea and Makemake are now in that field of view, but they are small and far away - they should not be visible. A black stripe moving from left to right comes from an object that moves above the label STEREO Ahead HI2. In short. Either the object is moving slower than the background stars, and is, roughly speaking, Nibiru, or, more likely, the central stars move faster than the upper and lower ones. This means that “stars” and “galaxies” are located in the spherical Oort Cloud, which is the border of the Universe.
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk

*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 30
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #15 on: February 22, 2021, 09:21:50 PM »
Descent of Perseverance to the surface of Mars. Height (allegedly) 9.5 km. The bright spot on the surface is the reflection of the Sun. Can there be such a reflection on the surface of a sphere with a diameter of 6.7 thousand km, or the diameter of Mars is about 15-20 km?

Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk

*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 30
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #16 on: February 23, 2021, 04:42:29 AM »
According to NASA, these are the same video. On the right - in real time, on the left - 30% of real time. In the left video the light source is at 9 o'clock. In the right video, the light source is at 3-5 hours. This can be seen on the ropes (slings), the canopy of the parachute and the light source “in the sky”. This is the official video!

(animation slowed down by 50%)
Animation source title (from YouTube), link is in the previous message of this thread:
Perseverance Rover’s Descent and Touchdown on Mars (Official NASA Video)
P.S.: Footage from 2 different cameras. My carelessness.
« Last Edit: February 23, 2021, 06:12:35 AM by AlexandrKushnirtshuk »
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk

*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 30
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #17 on: February 23, 2021, 05:26:00 AM »
Huge mystery blob found under the moon's far side.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/massive-blob-discovered-moon-surface
Title of the recent russian article and quote from it:
The largest crater of the moon helped scientists figure out how our satellite was formed
Quote
Scientists decided to clarify the process of the formation of the Moon by studying the South Pole-Aitken Basin (SPA). This is the largest, deepest and oldest crater of the Moon, which was formed about 4.3 billion years ago, at the very beginning of the existence of a natural satellite of our planet.
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk

Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #18 on: February 23, 2021, 05:58:11 AM »
Interesting videos, my only question was about perseverences descent speed of a few hundred meters per second, that's crazy, and with a parachute?  Maybe there atmosphere is less thick or something.
Is the Earth flat and sky is round?  Or is the Earth round and the sky flat?

*

Offline AlexandrKushnirtshuk

  • *
  • Posts: 30
  • Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk
    • View Profile
Re: New model of the Universe.
« Reply #19 on: February 23, 2021, 09:43:49 AM »
How much of Mars is visible in this animation, judging by the size of the solar reflection on its surface?
Quote
Descent of Perseverance to the surface of Mars. Height (allegedly) 9.5 km. The bright spot on the surface is the reflection of the Sun. Can there be such a reflection on the surface of a sphere with a diameter of 6.7 thousand km, or the diameter of Mars is about 15-20 km?


Animation source title (from YouTube):
Perseverance Rover’s Descent and Touchdown on Mars (Official NASA Video)
Alexandr Kushnirtshuk (1984.12.04), Ukraine, Lutsk