3. Objects over time should be hitting faster and harder as the Earth's speed increases.
This is, once again, an assumption. "Over time", we are talking about more than one different object. You are making an assumption about their velocity relative to each other by asserting this.
This is what I would expect with a body accelerating through space. UA clearly diverges from some of the rules of physics, but can't find what those are, so I am asking for clarification.
UA does not "diverge" from any established laws of physics. You are simply refusing to state your assumptions.
Ok, let me try this from a different angle to try and understand. In current physics what is accepted is...
1. The Earth, Sun and stars of the milky way are all moving at approximately the same speed relative to each other, a very small fraction of the speed of light, about 0.001c.
2. Cosmic rays are protons that are moving at a very high rate of speed, about 0.98c.
3. So when a cosmic ray hits the earth, it's speed is largely determined by it's speed, the Earth is nearly a stationary target.
So here is my trying to understand UA.
So in UA, the Earth is accelerating forward at 9.8m/s. It will fairly quickly approach and exceed the speed of the incoming cosmic rays as it moves through the galaxy.
My assumption is that under UA Earth is accelerating through space, and encountering objects, and these encounters would be more energetic as it continues to accelerate.
I am trying to understand which of my assumptions are wrong, and what the correct way is for UA. I know the way I explained it is not correct, but I don't have enough knowledge of the theory to be able to model it, and need some help.