Precisely, this change in the muon spectrum is NOT observed - but should be in UA.
You didn't answer my question. Why do you claim that it should be in UA?
We’ve...already discussed this. Are you messing with me? I don’t want to just be repeating myself....
Let’s go point by point. Maybe you can indicate where we are missing each other.
What follows is with respect to a muon detection event on the Earth’s surface using probably a scintillator and amplifier. The muon origin is a cosmic ray that creates a cascade upon interaction with the atmosphere.
Sorry, not trying to be pedantic, just getting super precise in order to find our mismatch. If you disagree with the situation above, please indicate. The points then follow:
1. In UA, we are in a noninertial frame. Agree?
2. In RET, we are in an inertial frame. Agree?
3. If agree to 1 above then SR is invalid to use. Agree?
4. If agree to 2 above then SR is valid to use. Agree?
We may end up stopped by this point to discuss. But in case not:
5. GR on the earth’s surface is a weak field limit. The spacetime curvature is small - that is, the Riemann tensor is perturbative in Minkowski space. Upon completing the expansion, Einstein’s field equations reduce to Newtonian mechanics.
Therefore, to appeal to GR in UA means to accept newton - it is hence self-contradictory, because UA assumes no Newton.
You have constructed a proof by contradiction against UA in using GR.
The only way to avoid this is to refuse the weak field limit. This is incorrect GR, but presumably you wish to modify it in some fashion. I assume so, otherwise why are we even discussing it?
The most direct way to modify it is to absorb the weak field expansion terms into the stress energy tensor. This preserves the equality. I assume this is what you intend...
That means objects entering that spacetime will encounter a shift in their spectrum. But what reference frame do you COMPARE this shift?
I hope you got something out of that article I sent you on GR frames.
Anyway, you simply measure two inbound muons - with some time delay between them. Since you are in a noninertial frame, the stress energy tensor must absorb more terms as time proceeds. So you compare the spectrum to what you got a week ago, or whatever.
But this is not observed.
I’m trying to help you construct a different modification to GR that mighty be better - hence the articles I sent last time.
I look forward to your reply