My 2 cents, as everyone else is saying that.
Part of my beef with the current wiki is that it seems to be going in the wrong direction. It deals more with listing arguments than principles, and when principles are defined it's rather vague. For example, there's a page on the
Coriolis Effect but not on celestial gears: that gives the implication both that it's the only response, and limits the explanation.
Listing arguments is an impractical way to explain a model, or give anything for people to get their teeth into. It provokes, as Thork says, but it doesn't really explain. You need a grounding in basic FET before you can really understand a lot of the responses to the arguments, otherwise it's a lot of what-ifs and maybe-nots. Getting people to post is a good thing, getting people to post the same questions is not. Plus honestly I'd question how much of the wiki is read by newcomers.
EAT was mentioned earlier, but the
EAT page there currently appears to just be a copy/pasted forum post that doesn't actually explain what the electromagnetic accelerator is, how it works, doesn't tie it to UA, references experiments that aren't explained or given, and mentions a sentient pizza that's just going to baffle any newcomer rather than make them understand.
If you have a good explanation of independent principles, from UA to celestial gravitation to DET's aether to anything from Sandokhan, that alone can be used to answer questions. If celestial gears are explained, so is the Coriolis effect, to use the above example. Instead of centering everything around RET and what REers believe and argue, it seems much more practical to focus on the FE principles themselves, and then have a page that lists responses to arguments.
And as far as the mishmash goes, categories solve that, or alternatively other pages. You have a page on the
Neo-Classical Model for example, but it doesn't bother to link to any pages that exist to explain the components.
Like Pete said, I'm focusing on my own wiki for now. I'm not opposed to helping, maybe writing directly for it at a later date, but at the current stage it's hard to determine what exactly the wiki is trying to do or be.
I've been planning to go through
all the pages at some point just as reference for my own work, to see if there's information I missed or major topics to include, if it'd help for reference I could reference the pages that to me seem most in need of improvement, whether it's refocusing the Coriolis Effect page to actually be about celestial gears, or mentioning that the Neo-Classical page should link to others, or that the EAT page needs clarification, or that the Lady Blount page which is just a quote from the literature should probably just be merged with the Bedford Level page.