That is a different experiment and a different Wang. Look into Ruyong Wang's experiment:

My mistake. Your post said something about light speeds faster than c, so I wrongly assumed you meant Lijun Wang's experiments.

So I went through the Dr. R.Wang's paper from your link and I couldn't find the part about the speeds of light faster than c, so now I'm not sure where are you getting this idea from.

I also don't see where Dr. R.Wang is mentioning that his experiment contradicts relativity.

It seems to me none of those experiments are really proving your point, you are just drawing unfounded conclusions. Your argument sounds like this:

1. If aether exists it means the earth must be flat

2. Relativity is killing my best attempts to prove that aether exists

3. If I can prove that relativity is wrong then aether exists

The first problem is, proving relativity wrong doesn't automatically prove the existence of aether. That is a propositional fallacy.

The second problem is you can't really prove relativity wrong. All you have is a pseudoscience paper from a person called "Robert Bennett" who seem to be one of the authors of the book "Galileo Was Wrong The Church Was Right", is that the same person?