Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Lord Dave

Pages: < Back  1 ... 284 285 [286] 287 288 ... 354  Next >
5701
Arts & Entertainment / Re: First Look at Ben Affleck's Batman
« on: January 29, 2016, 08:39:37 AM »
Arrow is on Hulu.  Paid hulu, but hulu.
Though it might be on the cw's website too.

When I checked, Hulu only had the first three episodes, then it skipped to the Legends crossover, then the most recent episode (well, the tenth episode, there's been another since then).  And I do have paid Hulu.

I may check the CW's website, but I can't get that on my TV and I'd much rather watch it there than on my computer.

Yeah I see that.  Eeewww.

If you have chromecast you can cast a chrome browser tab to your tv.
The cw app doesn't appear to have chromecast ability though.
But if your phone supports miracast, you can cast from it to a chromecast.  Phone will be on and unusable during the time though.(cause miracast is a mirror cast)

Might be other options depending on what your tv model is.


5702
Arts & Entertainment / Re: First Look at Ben Affleck's Batman
« on: January 29, 2016, 07:12:16 AM »
Honestly they're doing it better with their TV properties.

I agree, but out of curiosity, which TV properties specifically you were thinking of?  Gotham, for example, is absolutely terrible and I will fight anyone who disagrees with me.

Well, specifically, I've been bingeing on Arrow on Netflix (I am up to ep 4 of the 4th season now; it's not available on Hulu so I will probably have to pay for the remaining episodes to get caught up  :() and I think it just might be the best show on TV right now, despite a (slight) dip in quality in Season 3.  Flash which I've been watching since it started is just pure goofy fun.  I am enjoying Supergirl and Gotham to a lesser degree... regarding your opinion of the latter, I don't think it's terrible, although I do absolutely hate the kid they have playing Bruce.  The guy playing Penguin, on the other hand, is brilliant.

Oh yeah, and Teen Titans Go...   ;D ;D ;D
Arrow is on Hulu.  Paid hulu, but hulu.
Though it might be on the cw's website too.

5703
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: The saga of Cliven Bundy
« on: January 28, 2016, 07:07:42 AM »
Yeah, if they play it right, they've just created a group of martyrs.
Is there enough media attention for that though?
That depends on whether or not they play it right. Nobody knew who the Bundy family was before they started doing this kind of stuff, either.
True.  But I don't think they have the skills to take advantage of it.

5704
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: The saga of Cliven Bundy
« on: January 28, 2016, 06:35:14 AM »
It's hardly over.  Only some of them were arrested or killed.

The big media name was arrested though.  No one else has enough media pull to make headlines outside the local paper unless they do something drastic.

The movement will fizzle out when they run out of food, money, or conviction.

Yeah, if they play it right, they've just created a group of martyrs.
Is there enough media attention for that though?

5705
Arts & Entertainment / Re: First Look at Ben Affleck's Batman
« on: January 28, 2016, 06:28:21 AM »
Are you saying that Superman can't have these? That's extremely unrealistic. And you're being mad and angry over nothing.
Superman is not flawless.

No, just speaking my preference.  I'm not angry or mad, I just like less drama in my superman entertainment is all.

5706
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: The saga of Cliven Bundy
« on: January 27, 2016, 09:01:17 PM »

5707
Arts & Entertainment / Re: First Look at Ben Affleck's Batman
« on: January 27, 2016, 07:52:53 PM »
Maybe not but I don't want to see Superman brought down to my level, I want to see people elevated to his.  I want him to be better than us and we aspire to that.  Otherwise, what's the point of the character?
Who says he's brought down to your level?

By having moments of doubt and making hard choices that make you suffer emotionally.

5708
Arts & Entertainment / Re: First Look at Ben Affleck's Batman
« on: January 27, 2016, 06:30:03 PM »
Superman is not supposed to be dark and gritty.  He's supposed to be the light that shows us the way.
The two are not mutually exclusive.

Maybe not but I don't want to see Superman brought down to my level, I want to see people elevated to his.  I want him to be better than us and we aspire to that.  Otherwise, what's the point of the character?

5709
Arts & Entertainment / Re: First Look at Ben Affleck's Batman
« on: January 27, 2016, 06:20:55 PM »
What kind of shit focus grouos do these studios get thst say "Man, I wish superheroes were dark and miserable like me."

Superman is not supposed to be dark and gritty.  He's supposed to be the light that shows us the way.

5710
Arts & Entertainment / Re: First Look at Ben Affleck's Batman
« on: January 27, 2016, 12:53:29 PM »
Its good to see another villian than luthor, at least.

Unless he sucks hard.

5711
Arts & Entertainment / Re: First Look at Ben Affleck's Batman
« on: January 27, 2016, 09:03:22 AM »
Wow.

I'm just... Wow. How... Why....

What the everloving fuck are they doing?!  Doomsday would be a two parter by itself, but throwing in Darkseid too?  Toon many badguys.

5712
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: 2016 US Presidential Race
« on: January 27, 2016, 08:47:17 AM »
Trump is still leading by a large margin.  WTF?

Seriously, could he actually win the caucus and become the GOP candidate?

5713
Wait... You said your readers love your proofs and hate the faq. 
Then you say your only supporter is yourself?  By mere fact that you dismiss evidence that isn't your own?

5714
The FAQ is just the very first message, not the debate which ensued afterwards: I am telling you how things are, you seem to  want to be making up the rules on this thread, which is kind of rude, don't you think?

You haven't paid your dues here or anywhere else to be able to tell me what to do.

I have given the best references which do answer your questions (most of them are linked to this very site).

The other references do include the very definition of a quark, subquark, and a Higgs boson for that matter: obviously, as usual, your homework was done superficially, that is why you have no right to complain.


The photographs refer to subquark flow, that is, the magnetic field (Spintronics published these amazing images for the very first time).


Now, do not pretend that you do not understand the answers I have been providing to you.

What I was expecting from you, is to take your time, in fact several days, to go through the ample references I provided: here you are, 15 minutes later with a bizarre request, "simplify".

You were able to understand them when we were debating the DePalma experiment some years ago, no complaints from you then.


Trust my judgment: I know that most of my readers DO understand what I'm saying, and are very dissatisfied with the other faq.

The official faq answers NOTHING at all pertaining to gravity, radio waves and much more: if YOU are satisfied with this state of affairs, most other RE are not.

One of the RE asked a very simple question: how do you explain the ham radio distance to the moon measurements? No other FE was able to answer (nor will they using the official faq). But I was.

My FAQ does answer the important questions, no matter what you say: it has been used for the past  eight years to defeat each and everyone of the best RE (perhaps they understood it much better than you can).

If I need days to understand an answer, then it really shouldn't be in an faq.

As for paying my dues, not sure which ones those are.  Activity?  Upper forum activity?  FET promotion?

Finally: ok.  Your readers trust your judgement.  Fine.

Let them speak your praise here.  In fact, if they do, its likely you'll win the vote and have your faq put up.

As for if I'm satisfied with the current faq: yes.

5715
The FAQ is the very first message: it is absolutely accesible to every reader, and it does answer the questions that the official faq cannot.
It is not the first message.
Also, what you wrote answers nothing.  I'm sorry but if I can't understans the answers without first understanding how subquarks flow inside the aether (and what aether is) then its not a faq.  (Frequently Asked Questions). What it is, is a book.


Quote
The readers of the FEFAQ want to be challenged, to go beyond what the official science has to say.
Or they want answers to frequently asked questions.

Quote
My explanations are pretty clear: please read the bibliographical material, explained by the best scientists in the world (for example, Dr. Stephen Phillips of UCLA).
No, they really aren't.  You didn't define a quark or a boson.  I know they're subparticles that make up quantum physics but most will not.

Quote
I have even put at your disposal PHOTOGRAPHS of magnets with subquark flow.
How do you photograph a subquark when they are, by definition, smaller than light waves?  Smaller than electrons?  If you're talking about the picture, thats a single subquark string, so not a magnet with subquark flow.


Quote
Finally, you don't seem to understand what is going on here.

Other than my FAQ, the reader will not able to get the answers he/she wants re: FET.

Not from the official faq anyway.
I haven't gotten any answer I understand yet.  Do you think a new person will do better?  I at least know you and am familiar with your work.

Simplify.

5716
And this is why your FAQ is terrible.  It requires a degree in levee to understand anything you say.

5717
Since subquarks are smaller than quarks which are smaller than electrons which are smaller than atoms..


How does so many align spontaneously?  And why?

Also, what about electrons?

And your "diality paradox solution" is a paradox.  A boson is a particle.  A subquark is... God knows what.  Neither is a wave.  And if they are, a wave of what?  Energy?

Also, what about "what is a conductor"?

And if bosons are one wave and subquark strings are the other, how do they impart momentum energy when passing through matter?  (Bosons and subquarks are both smaller than matter thus can't impact it.)

5718
I read the FAQ you posted and I am very confused.

Like if monopole magnets are subquaks, then wouldn't a string of monopole magnets be a string of subquarks?

Also, if boson's flow through subquark strings to make electricity and magatism, how can subquark strings exist if Aether = medium through which the subquarks strings (ether) flow when Aether is only above the atmosphere as the dome?

Finally, if bosons flow outside a conductor to make magetism, then what about a permanent bar magnet?  The bosons should be flowing inside the conductive metal, out into the non-conductive air, then around and back into the conductive metal.  But no electricity flows in the metal.

Also, we see lighting.  Does that mean Air is a conductor?  What about rocks?  Wood?  Plastic?  People?
What is a conductor?

5719
Suggestions & Concerns / Re: Changes to the FAQ
« on: January 26, 2016, 09:46:38 AM »
245,000 views and no one still believes in your model.

Doesn't that make you pause and ask why?

5720
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: 2016 US Presidential Race
« on: January 25, 2016, 12:14:41 PM »
Well, it looks like it is going to be Trump.

Trump will win Republican Idol because he has experience in reality TV competitions. And that is exactly what this presidential cycle will be like. Politicians used to have debates run by the groups such as women's lib who would ask questions of the candidates based on their area of interest. The candidates would get a 60 min opening speech, receive follow up questions and then provide a 30 min rebuttal.

Now they go on NBC or Fox debates. They have 60 seconds to talk about the economy for example, get a question back and give a 30 second rebuttal.

This plays to Trump. He's going to slaughter any other Republican.


Now Trump is also going to win the whitehouse. Janet Yellen has seen to that. By November the economy in America is going to be in meltdown with a crashed stock market, bail outs for banks, major corps, huge amounts of debt etc. Yellen pricked the bubble. And no democrat will stand a chance because they are going to be blamed for the financial turmoil as it has happened on Obama's watch and he kept telling everyone he saved the economy ... which he didn't, he kicked the can down the road.


So Trump it is. Enjoy America, enjoy.
The GOP will block him at the caucus.

Pages: < Back  1 ... 284 285 [286] 287 288 ... 354  Next >