stack, let's make this simple: if you find one FE'er who claims to agree with the representation of the theory in there,
in its entirety, you'll be able to claim that there exist FE'ers of whom this is representative. If the video's author wanted to make that claim, he could have simply referenced a particular position, whichever one happens to be your favourite. The FES and most large alternative FE groups all have decent write-ups, so providing a link would have ended this argument very quickly.
I strongly suggest you will not be able to do that, and since your response to attempts at clarification is a lot of "nuh uh"-ing, there is clearly not much point in trying.
As I've pointed out many times before, I know RE'ers who struggle to tell the difference between velocity and acceleration. I don't strut around claiming that "RE'ers" fail at such simple concepts, and I'm sure you can imagine what everyone's reaction would be if I did. For some reason, yOuTuBeRs doing the same thing to us is met with your approval. It shouldn't be.
You've been here for long enough. You're familiar with the basics. If you're going to pretend that you're not, please do so outside of the FE boards.
But most in the FE community disagree and find it anathema.
You are misinformed, or deliberately misinforming (I strongly suspect the latter - you're not
that horrendously incompetent, and your other arguments in this thread are very telling). There are some figures who find it particularly offensive. They are by no means the majority.