Exclaiming that none of the articles have vax status might be hyperbole.
I didn't claim none. Just the ones I checked where there was no mention of vax status. Pretty simple really.
You specifically claimed that you checked the ten articles before and ten articles after. You lied.
Claiming that you checked the ten articles before and the ten articles after is not. That is a blatant lie of claiming to do something you did not do to try to win your argument.
And how exactly did you determine this?
You claimed it publicly on the forum here:
It's pretty clear you're the one doing the lying. You found one. Good for you. I checked the news stories for the 10 before yours and the 10 after. No mention of vaccine status. Zero.
And I have a really simple question for you. The author claims that the 1600+ listed were killed or harmed by the "COVID Injection". Do you believe that claim to be:
TRUE
or
FALSE
I bet dollars to donuts that you won't answer the question.
The author does not specifically claim that all people died because of the vaccine. This is another lie from you. The author gives the deaths as a reason to be suspicious of the vaccination program.
The author
concedes in the first paragraph on the page that it is possible that not all of the people listed were vaccinated: "While it is possible this can happen to people who did not get a COVID vaccine, the sheer numbers clearly point to the only obvious cause."
Please refrain from making blatant lies if you wish to engage in any meaningful discussion.