[Tontogary]

Proving the moon landing won't prove flat earth, it will just prove the moon landing. The only thing that will prove round earth is an actual, non cgi shot of the planet. But they can't give us that.

The Himiwari-8 satellite provides complete images of the Earth every 10 minutes.

Don’t bother, it will be explained as fake/all part of the mass conspiracy.................
Or
Tom will say he cant be bothered to spend the time or effort to explain this, but the onus is on you to prove it is true, although seeing the pictures, and the science behind it is evidence enough, he cant be bothered to devote more than 15 mins a day to discuss it.

It seems like the 15 mins a day allocated by the council members are to write posts saying it has been proved beyond doubt by,
Rowbotham, Winship, Holden, Dowie, Hampden,Blount, Smith, and Carpenter, all of who I were Victorian/Edwardian believers whose writings were over a hundred years ago, with no modern proof at all.

Recently Voliva and Johnson were modern proponents of a FE, one of which admitted his only reference book was the bible, and the other who made similar remarks. Great science and evidence that lot make.

On the other hand there are countless papers, practical experiences and a mountain of EVIDENCE that support RE, all of which are discounted as lies, rubbish, fake or a conspiracy.

I do work with Crew rescource Management, as do airline pilots etc, and there is a particular trait in humans which has led people to make fatal mistakes and crashes.
If a person completely believes something, they will discount any contrary evidence that does not support their belief, or massage the evidence to try to support their “knowledge” even to the point of crashing their aircraft, ship, etc even in the knowledge it spells certain doom.

Sound familiar? I predict certain doom for this site if the FE keep denying any sort of evidence presented.

[Parallax]

Proving the moon landing won't prove flat earth, it will just prove the moon landing. The only thing that will prove round earth is an actual, non cgi shot of the planet. But they can't give us that.

The Himiwari-8 satellite provides complete images of the Earth every 10 minutes.

The images are CGI and are not of the earth.

[Tontogary]

Proving the moon landing won't prove flat earth, it will just prove the moon landing. The only thing that will prove round earth is an actual, non cgi shot of the planet. But they can't give us that.

The Himiwari-8 satellite provides complete images of the Earth every 10 minutes.

The images are CGI and are not of the earth.

Oh you are predictable parallax. Read my previous post, where i predicted what you will say. Does that make me a mind reader?

[Tumeni]

The images are CGI and are not of the earth.

Come on, you don't REALLY think there's a team of back-room staff assembling one of these every 10 minutes, do you .... ?

[Parallax]

The images are CGI and are not of the earth.

Come on, you don't REALLY think there's a team of back-room staff assembling one of these every 10 minutes, do you .... ?

No, no I don't. But they'll have a very advanced computer program that can draw one of these images up every so often.

[Tumeni]

No, no I don't. But they'll have a very advanced computer program that can draw one of these images up every so often.

Speculation. Unless you have some empirical evidence of such a program ... ?

T
=====================================================

[Spycrab]

The images are CGI and are not of the earth.

Come on, you don't REALLY think there's a team of back-room staff assembling one of these every 10 minutes, do you .... ?

No, no I don't. But they'll have a very advanced computer program that can draw one of these images up every so often.

Proof, my dude, proof.
-Discrepancies between the 'cgi' images and the earth's actual form* like mountains out of place or something?
-How pictures could not be acquired from this angle?
-How you can tell it is in fact 'Computer Generated Imaging'?
-links to all or part of this 'advanced program'?
-any evidence at all?
So far you have reliably put out conjecture and statements, but they are empty and unhelpful without some facts for flavor.
You can do better than this, Parallax.

*and not just "the real earth is flat"

[Parallax]

The images are CGI and are not of the earth.

Come on, you don't REALLY think there's a team of back-room staff assembling one of these every 10 minutes, do you .... ?

No, no I don't. But they'll have a very advanced computer program that can draw one of these images up every so often.

Proof, my dude, proof.
-Discrepancies between the 'cgi' images and the earth's actual form* like mountains out of place or something?
-How pictures could not be acquired from this angle?
-How you can tell it is in fact 'Computer Generated Imaging'?
-links to all or part of this 'advanced program'?
-any evidence at all?
So far you have reliably put out conjecture and statements, but they are empty and unhelpful without some facts for flavor.
You can do better than this, Parallax.

*and not just "the real earth is flat"

Well if you look at the blue marble shots of the earth over a few decades a major flaw is the fact North America seems to have got considerably larger.

[StinkyOne]

The images are CGI and are not of the earth.

Come on, you don't REALLY think there's a team of back-room staff assembling one of these every 10 minutes, do you .... ?

No, no I don't. But they'll have a very advanced computer program that can draw one of these images up every so often.

Proof, my dude, proof.
-Discrepancies between the 'cgi' images and the earth's actual form* like mountains out of place or something?
-How pictures could not be acquired from this angle?
-How you can tell it is in fact 'Computer Generated Imaging'?
-links to all or part of this 'advanced program'?
-any evidence at all?
So far you have reliably put out conjecture and statements, but they are empty and unhelpful without some facts for flavor.
You can do better than this, Parallax.

*and not just "the real earth is flat"

Well if you look at the blue marble shots of the earth over a few decades a major flaw is the fact North America seems to have got considerably larger.

Would you please post links so we can see what you're referring to?

[Tumeni]

Well if you look at the blue marble shots of the earth over a few decades a major flaw is the fact North America seems to have got considerably larger.

Well, the size of any continent in a photo of Earth is entirely dependent on the distance of the camera from the Earth. It's simple geometry.

When you look at any sphere from a short distance, you don't see a full hemisphere, you see a Spherical Cap, and the size of that cap depends on how far away your observation point is.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_cap

Simple geometry will yield the number of degrees latitude and longitude that can be seen from any given distance or height. At some point, a camera above central USA will only be able to 'see' the USA, and the USA will appear to fill a whole hemisphere. But it doesn't, it's just filling the spherical cap that the camera can see.

Different blue marbles have been taken from different distances, that's all.

https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-blue-marble-photos-show-a-changing-earth.t6616/

 

[Tontogary]

The images are CGI and are not of the earth.

Come on, you don't REALLY think there's a team of back-room staff assembling one of these every 10 minutes, do you .... ?

No, no I don't. But they'll have a very advanced computer program that can draw one of these images up every so often.

If it is so sophisticated, and such an elemental part of the conspiracy theory, how do they get it so wrong, and easy enough for the conspiracy theorist to point out?

Or can it be as Tumeni says, and be perspective? The presence of which you will no doubt say doesn’t exist!

[Rama Set]

Proving the moon landing won't prove flat earth, it will just prove the moon landing. The only thing that will prove round earth is an actual, non cgi shot of the planet. But they can't give us that.

The Himiwari-8 satellite provides complete images of the Earth every 10 minutes.

The images are CGI and are not of the earth.

Two citations needed.

Well if you look at the blue marble shots of the earth over a few decades a major flaw is the fact North America seems to have got considerably larger.

That has nothing to do with Himiwari-8.  Unless you can show conclusively that there is something capable of creating images of the Earth every 10 minutes that can match weather patterns then you are just howling at the moon.