Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
https://www.newsweek.com/kamala-harris-first-interview-ratings-compared-donald-trump-1946932Everyone likes to gawk at various types of accidents, such as interstate pileups and train wrecks. People are willing to sit around for hours at events like these. Sometimes they contact others telling them to come and look.
This must be driving the orange doofus nuts. LOL
Odd that he'd make a whole video for his campaign about it if it wasn't a PR stunt. Especially since he skipped the last two years...Odd the family asked for photos and video and odd he skipped because he wasn't invited there the last two years?
deadpool & wolverine
tbh greatest movie of all time
was excellent imoWas it really that good, or can I just wait for streaming at home?
Anyone who is not a US Citizen is not entitled to the rights granted in the US Constitution.Constitutions are written for the country and its citizens.
End of argument.
Wait... Are you actually arguing that no one who isn't a US citizen is bound or protected by the constitution? Because that's a bold statement that seems to be ignored by all legal history.
Hey, according to the founders of the country, everyone has rights that are inalienable. I cannot help it if some bot is incapable of understanding it. I also cannot help it if some bot does not understand that laws governing the process of legal immigration are not antithetical to the Bill of Rights and actually help protect them.If labeling a candidate as anti-Bill of Rights makes me a bleeding heart commie who belongs in a prison with my druggy ilk, you got me.My problem with Camelface is she doesn't uphold the US Constitution.
It seems you don't give a fuck about it either.
You turned into a bleeding heart commie just to be against Kamala. You belong in prison with the rest of your druggy ilk, maybe then Kamala would have you doing something that actually contributes to society.
Yeah I'm sure next you'll be telling me all about how illegal immigrants have "rights" and are human beings or whatever. What's next for the action69 communist revolution?
If labeling a candidate as anti-Bill of Rights makes me a bleeding heart commie who belongs in a prison with my druggy ilk, you got me.My problem with Camelface is she doesn't uphold the US Constitution.
It seems you don't give a fuck about it either.
You turned into a bleeding heart commie just to be against Kamala. You belong in prison with the rest of your druggy ilk, maybe then Kamala would have you doing something that actually contributes to society.
My problem with Camelface is she doesn't uphold the US Constitution.Please. Keeping low-level security risk offenders in jail (mostly drug offenders, by the way), is absolutely asinine.
I'm confused. Is your problem with Kamala that she isn't progressive enough?She was arguing for them to stay in jail so they could be kept as free labor to fight wildfires caused by the administration (of which she was part) ridiculous environmental policies prohibiting the clearing of underbrush in forests.
Using criminals as free labor to be used by the state? Based and repeal-the-13th-pilled.
It was literally Trump and his supporters who brought race into this by insisting that Harris isn't really black.^Case in point.
The prisons are overcrowded in California because they have a population with the 5th highest crime rate per capita in the US and they banned private prisons. Kamala trying to keep prisoners in prison was one of the few good things she has done. Seems a bit odd to try to hold her on a talking point that would resonate with moderates so well. Saying "she kept people in jail" would mostly lead to Trump losing votes, which is why coincidentally, he avoids that particular talking point.Please.
I do not know. What I do know is the Supreme Court had ordered California to reduce overcrowding in their prisons ( like many other states) and she sought to subvert the process, arguing against the release of many low-security level offenders.keep many of her brethren incarcerated past release eligibility.
I'm confused. Does the right support the early release of criminals now?