Are you saying that the two photos were taken by two different sattelites, from different locations, at different times; yet the cloud formations are the same
That is worse than the flat-earther ideas about the "blue marble"
So "That is worse than the flat-earther ideas about the 'blue marble'" is it, when NASA themselves say
Enhancements
Blue Marble: Next Generation offers greater spatial detail of the surface and spans a longer data collection period than the original. The original Blue Marble was a composite of four months of MODIS observations with a spatial resolution (level of detail) of 1 square kilometer per pixel.
And you by much detective found that
The original Blue Marble was a composite image -
![Tongue :P](/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
such brilliant detective work.
![Tongue :P](/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
No wonder you understand nothing! Where did I say "two different satellites, from different locations,
at different times"?
I said "No, I do not see! The earth did not turn between the photos! They were presumably taken at
almost the same timeI had not found this reference before, but see
GOES-16 and GOES-13 Earth Photo Comparison from Jan 15, 2017. Jan 15, 2017
With five-times greater coverage, four-times the spatial resolution, and three-times the spectral channels than earlier generations of GOES-16's Advanced Baseline Imager can provide more detailed imagery and multi-task in ways that previous GOES imagers could not. For proof of that, consider the following image comparing full-disk images captured by two NOAA satellites -- GOES-16 and GOES-13 -- at the same time on the same day: 1:07 p.m. EST on January 15, 2017.
From NOAA Satellite Information Services, GOES-16 Image Gallery
There, has that image got enough detail
[1] and is
"at the same time on the same day: 1:07 p.m. EST on January 15, 2017" clear enough for even you to understand?
Can't you do internet searches where you live? You could so easliy found this out yourself.
==========
If cannon-balls and sniper bullets have to obey coriolis, why water vapour doesn't
- Nothing has to obey the Coriolis. It is not "a Law", but a subtle effect due to the earth's rotation.
The Coriolis effect is nothing more than objects moving essentially independently of the earth's rotation obeying Newton's Laws.
- Moving air and the water vapour in it is affected by the Coriolis effect, that is why:
Apart from a region close to the equator
All low pressure weather systems
in the Northern Hemisphere (including hurricanes and typhoons) rotate anti-clockwise
and
In the Southern Hemisphere (including cyclones) rotate clockwise.
But all high pressure weather systems
in the Northern Hemisphere rotate clockwise
and
In the Southern Hemisphere rotate anti-clockwise.
Please explain these facts on the Flat Earth!=============
today is February second, and ground-hogs seem to be just as accurate as million-dollar predicting weather-sattelites
Who said "million-dollar predicting weather-sattelites(sic)" themselves predict any weather?
Really? I do suspect that even a ground-hog might be able to spell satellites better that
789.
[1] Right click the image and "display in new tab", then click the picture to enlarge it. Then you can fault-find to your little hearts content.