Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Didn't you? Surely you can tell me what it is since you seem so convinced it's true and that wouldn't be because it helps Trump because that would make you a bias piece of... Of wait, you are. Nevermind.And what is the legal basis of her ruling and why was the trial allowed to even start?I thought you claimed you read the ruling?
Got to have fodder for the evening news.
With no legal standing. And ignoring precident from the last 100+ years.With plenty of legal standing and change has always been your baby (as in the diapers on Joe).
But sure, she's in charge and if she wants to help Trump, that's her business, right?
I cannot help it if a bot is incapable of understanding issues of appropriations and the like.
Hawk tuah...
With no legal standing. And ignoring precident from the last 100+ years.I do not need to try that again, since the persons running the show declared it does apply.Which does not apply since congress already made that unnecessary for special prosecutors. So try again.Oh hey, let's forget the confirmation process all together, right?
Oh hey, found the authority.
28USC 533.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/533#:~:text=28%20U.S.%20Code%20%C2%A7%20533%20%2D%20Investigative%20and%20other%20officials%3B%20appointment,-U.S.%20Code&text=to%20conduct%20such%20other%20investigations,directed%20by%20the%20Attorney%20General.
You know, in case you weren't trolling.
Hawk tuah...
Hawk tuah...
Which does not apply since congress already made that unnecessary for special prosecutors. So try again.Oh hey, let's forget the confirmation process all together, right?
Oh hey, found the authority.
28USC 533.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/533#:~:text=28%20U.S.%20Code%20%C2%A7%20533%20%2D%20Investigative%20and%20other%20officials%3B%20appointment,-U.S.%20Code&text=to%20conduct%20such%20other%20investigations,directed%20by%20the%20Attorney%20General.
You know, in case you weren't trolling.
Hawk tuah...
I think this was the dumbest possible decision the DNC could make. Time will tell if that's true.Why? Biden had zero chance of winning. Maybe you think Harris has too, but even if that's true it's not possible for anyone else to have less chance than Biden did. Him dropping out was the only possible chance the Democrats have of winning this election. There's a good chance they won't anyway, but there was nothing to lose.
" ...is there a statute in the United States Code that authorizes the appointment of Special Counsel Smith to conduct this prosecution? After careful study of this seminal issue, the answer is no."But that wasn't the ruling. The ruling was that all special counsels were unconstitutional. All of them.The correct proper way to appoint special counsel is for Congress to approve the appointment.https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-classified-documents-case-dismissed-07-15-24/index.htmlJack Smith had no standing, AT ALL.
Trump wins. His Judge has basically said all special appointments are unconstitutional and thus the case is dismissed, which breaks from every other judge whose had this. Also, she did this after over a year! Why didn't she dismiss it sooner? Because she's corrupt.
Mark my words: if Trump wins, he'll appointment her to SCOTUS.
Ok, so what was the correct, proper, standing person or group that should have been used? The DoJ? The President? Mitch McConnel?
That is why Mueller never went anywhere and why Smith was going nowhere.
Truman Show shit.
"If the political branches wish to grant the Attorney General power to appoint Special Counsel Smith to investigate and prosecute this action with the full powers of a United States Attorney, there is a valid means by which to do so. He can be appointed and confirmed through the default method prescribed in the Appointments Clause, as Congress has directed for United States Attorneys throughout
American history, see 28 U.S.C. ยง 541, or Congress can authorize his appointment through enactment of positive statutory law consistent with the Appointments Clause."
Maybe you can find something in the ruling that mentions ALL special counsels.
Well, that explains why you're unemployed.If you hire by ability and not ideology...
LMFAO!
Yeah, any text containing the words christian and values would more than likely be a problem with you, regardless of actual context.Believe it or not, I follow most Christian values. Just not the ones everyone seems to think is most important. Which seems odd, to me.
But that wasn't the ruling. The ruling was that all special counsels were unconstitutional. All of them.The correct proper way to appoint special counsel is for Congress to approve the appointment.https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-classified-documents-case-dismissed-07-15-24/index.htmlJack Smith had no standing, AT ALL.
Trump wins. His Judge has basically said all special appointments are unconstitutional and thus the case is dismissed, which breaks from every other judge whose had this. Also, she did this after over a year! Why didn't she dismiss it sooner? Because she's corrupt.
Mark my words: if Trump wins, he'll appointment her to SCOTUS.
Ok, so what was the correct, proper, standing person or group that should have been used? The DoJ? The President? Mitch McConnel?
That is why Mueller never went anywhere and why Smith was going nowhere.
Truman Show shit.
Why would he need to pardon himself if he can just order the DoJ to drop charges?Jesus, the amount of bullshit.https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-classified-documents-case-dismissed-07-15-24/index.htmlIndeed. Her ruling will certainly be appealed but that will not complete before the election so if Trump is elected then he will immediately pardon himself and then allow the appeal to reverse her decision so all the other folks found guilty via a special prosecutor will not be let out. Trump cares about Trump and little else. Of course if Trump is elected there will be vastly more to worry about than the special prosecutor regulations.
Trump wins. His Judge has basically said all special appointments are unconstitutional and thus the case is dismissed, which breaks from every other judge whose had this. Also, she did this after over a year! Why didn't she dismiss it sooner? Because she's corrupt.
Presidents cannot pardon themselves. All persons must apply for pardon or commutation. Once application has been filed, that is actually admission of guilt. If Trump tried this, he would lose all support and impeachment would be be successful.
Get a fucking grip and start practicing the words found in your goddamn username.
https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-classified-documents-case-dismissed-07-15-24/index.htmlJack Smith had no standing, AT ALL.
Trump wins. His Judge has basically said all special appointments are unconstitutional and thus the case is dismissed, which breaks from every other judge whose had this. Also, she did this after over a year! Why didn't she dismiss it sooner? Because she's corrupt.
Mark my words: if Trump wins, he'll appointment her to SCOTUS.
Months ago?Please spell out what factual issues you have with Project 2025, or is it just another bot post.
Dude was chosen eality on as campaign season began and he wasn't dead.
Regardless, I'm just salty that Trump has a real chance of winning and implement project 2025.