21
Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)
« on: August 31, 2023, 01:36:57 PM »
it is literally impossible to put dog hair on something and then lie about it
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
https://twitter.com/FoxNewsSunday/status/1667899493549764608
I’m back.
No analysis - but I can offer a very important
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Boston AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
All hail our dark lord, ruler of the dewey decimal system.
As a member of the liberal elite, I confirm that we all worship Satan. This is not a secret, you could have just asked.
I sacrificed a baby just this morning. It's blood was delicious.
hillary clinton caught LAUGHING this is epic
my big-picture viewpoint is that the coercive suppression of ideas is a necessary component of censorship.If I only censor things a little bit instead of a lot, that's okay in your world?
Tell you what, next time you get published, I'll change the words you write, not only post-publication but post-mortem..
That's a way of saying it's not a big deal. I don't think that's relevant to the thread topic. People have a problem with the censorship itself, not the importance or lack thereof regarding it.
which new message deviates from the original work? can you be more specific?You already quoted that.
Certain words have certain meanings. Other words have other meanings. How is nuking certain words from the story and replacing them not censorship of the idea of the original word?
When I say a person is fat, that means something specific (that they have an overabundance of fat). If I say they're enormous, that is much more vague. It could be that Augustus Gloop is a powerlifter. You don't know anymore because the new word is more vague. That's the whole point of changing it.
where exactly is censorship taking place? if that is censorship, then i would submit that the word no longer has any meaning. at least no meaning beyond "anytime anyone does something i personally would not have done."
Please, Gary, you're smarter than this.
You making this post is fucking stupid. Mocking people for having a problem with censorship, even if you don't think it is important, is not okay. If you have a problem with the thread then you can proceed to fuck off and leave the rest of the people discussing the topic alone. The world does not revolve around Gary's List Of Important Things Gary Takes Seriously.
If it is not a big deal, then why the bother of changing it in the first place?
If trying to convey a message different from the original work isn't censorship, then what is censorship? Should we just call it spindoctoring instead? Would that appease your child-like attempt to mock the thread?