I see words, not demonstration.
Sorry - I thought I'd save you the time of looking for the flights yourself. Can't you be bothered to do the most basic research? I can demonstrate how you can book one here: https://www.expedia.co.uk/Flights-Search?mode=search&paandi=true&trip=roundtrip&options=cabinclass%3Aeconomy%2Cnopenalty%3AN%2Csortby%3Aprice&passengers=children%3A0%2Cadults%3A1%2Cseniors%3A0%2Cinfantinlap%3AY&leg1=from%3ASantiago%2C%20Chile%20(SCL-Arturo%20Merino%20Benitez)%2Cto%3ASydney%2C%20NSW%2C%20Australia%20(SYD-Kingsford%20Smith%20Intl.)%2Cdeparture%3A28%2F3%2F2018TANYT&leg2=from%3ASydney%2C%20NSW%2C%20Australia%20(SYD-Kingsford%20Smith%20Intl.)%2Cto%3ASantiago%2C%20Chile%20(SCL-Arturo%20Merino%20Benitez)%2Cdeparture%3A4%2F4%2F2018TANYT
If I did not know better, I'd suspect you were a top class troll who does this just for giggles. I have to commend your stamina to keep this up day-in day-out. Anyway, I refuse to waste any more time on you. Ta' rah!
I have come to the conclusion, looking at the discussion, threads, lack of replies and when threads are abandoned, that Tom, Pete, Baby thork etc have, in reality, just set themselves a challenge to defend what is a very "undefendable" point regarding the shape of the earth. They dont really believe it, they are just messing with you, deliberately obfuscating the science facts and deliberatley being obtuse. They didnt come foreward when asked to clarify the reasons they believe in a flat earth and obviously wont own up to what I have just said as this will blow there personal challenge. You have to admit they have done a good job at fooling everyone.
Finally someone brought this up. I love debating as much as the next guy, and I'm somewhat active on these forums, but until we get some changes there's no real progress to make. The round earthers don't have a leg to stand on considering that the proof the flat earthers demand is restricted:
-no nasa, they're liars
-no photos or videos, they're liars
-no astronauts, they're liars
-no satellite tracking, those are weather balloons
-no sunsets, because perspective reasons
-no inconsistencies of the map, it's just a guess
-no math, that's rationalizing and we hate that
-no plane travel times, those are inaccurate
-no showing things disappearing over the curve, that's just waves
-no GPS because eLoran
(though actually I think they have caved on this issue, despite not attempting to explain how it works without satellites)
-no constellation related things, because "aetheric vortex"
-no eclipses, because "shadow object"
-no gravity, because "universal accelerator"
And even if you manage to squeeze your shred of credibility through all that, it's stated right there in the wiki, that you're still a liar:
P1) If personally unverifiable evidence contradicts an
obvious truth then the evidence is fabricated
P2) The Flat Earth is an obvious truth
P3) There is personally unverifiable evidence that
contradicts the FET
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
C1) The unverifiable evidence that contradicts the FET
is fabricated evidence
Bravo. This isn't empiricism.