[StinkyOne]

]I can't answer it because it's nonsensical. I've tried explaining this many times before. If you inject something into FET and ask me to defend this altered version, I won't do so. That is because I do not support your alteration. If you'd like, I can play the same game. I can round up a small group of people and ask them to keep asking you the same question over and over. It will make no sense. It will be a complete non-sequitur. But, after all, since you can't answer it, you must be wrong!

I'll also just take a moment to point out that you're projecting. So far, every question I've asked you resulted in nothing of value coming from you. Perhaps you should consider being the change you want to see?

To an extent, I agree with you. We are trying to inject something into FET. We are trying to find out how a photon gets from the sun to the bottom of a cloud using perspective. (it can't) That can't be in FET because the sun will always be higher than the clouds. If explaining the path of photons at sunrise/sunset is a non-sequitur, you're hypothesis on the shape of the Earth can't explain reality.

Nothing of value - you cut me. I've seen you called out repeatedly for your famous "you're wrong" posts, so I know you're quite familiar with posts that lack value. I'll try to up my game. 

[mtnman]

That requires math based on the movement of the Earth and moon around the sun.

Clearly, we disagree.

Yes, I would say we disagree.

So you claimed it was

a repeatable pattern which is very easy to use

Please use that pattern to pinpoint the start and end locations of the next solar eclipse visible in North America. Of course for this to be convincing you will need to show your work, as my math teachers used to say.

[GiantTurtle]

since you believe in space travel

I have no idea where you got that from.

I'm confused.
You cited evidence gathered from spacetravel.
I said that most flat earthers did not believe that existed.
You complained I was taking a view that "no serious flat earther believed" and applying that to you. But I was correct to do that as you don't believe in spacetravel.

So to summarise, you don't believe in spacetravel, but will use evidence that is gathered from it?