Re: Trump
« Reply #580 on: February 08, 2017, 10:58:58 PM »
So if he said "It's getting to the point," instead of "It's gotten to the point," all would be well in the world?

Re: Trump
« Reply #581 on: February 08, 2017, 11:10:28 PM »
So if he said "It's getting to the point," instead of "It's gotten to the point," all would be well in the world?

No. You were the one that implied that it makes a difference. If he thinks it's already happening, then he is lying, because it isn't. If he thinks it is going to happen in the future, then why is he accusing the media of something that hasn't happened yet, and why did they provide a list of past events in an attempt to back up the statement?

*

Online honk

  • *
  • Posts: 1709
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y


*

Online honk

  • *
  • Posts: 1709
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #584 on: February 09, 2017, 01:29:02 AM »
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y

*

Online Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 5434
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #585 on: February 09, 2017, 12:21:55 PM »
I'd write something but I think this video from the Late Show sums it up.


*

Online honk

  • *
  • Posts: 1709
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #586 on: February 09, 2017, 03:27:44 PM »
To the Trump supporters, or even those of you are neutral on him - are you okay with this? Again, he used the official POTUS account to retweet this, and there's no way this could be about protecting American jobs or the economy. He was just shilling for his daughter.
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y

*

Offline Пардисфла

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 6021
  • Professional computer somebody
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #587 on: February 09, 2017, 03:37:41 PM »
To the Trump supporters, or even those of you are neutral on him - are you okay with this? Again, he used the official POTUS account to retweet this, and there's no way this could be about protecting American jobs or the economy. He was just shilling for his daughter.

Well, she is supposed to be assisting him as President. Do you also have a problem with these other tweets about members of his administration?

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/825018149397463040
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/825101272982355968
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/826637556787838976
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/829496507841789952
when you try to mock anyone while also running the flat earth society. Lol

*

Online honk

  • *
  • Posts: 1709
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #588 on: February 09, 2017, 03:48:23 PM »
No, but he's not trying to promote the private business interests of any of those people.
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y

Re: Trump
« Reply #589 on: February 09, 2017, 03:49:08 PM »
To the Trump supporters, or even those of you are neutral on him - are you okay with this? Again, he used the official POTUS account to retweet this, and there's no way this could be about protecting American jobs or the economy. He was just shilling for his daughter.

Well, she is supposed to be assisting him as President. Do you also have a problem with these other tweets about members of his administration?

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/825018149397463040
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/825101272982355968
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/826637556787838976
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/829496507841789952

Does selling a clothing line have anything to do with her position helping him as president? Because I don't see him commenting on whatever Jeff Sessions does in his spare time that isn't related to his job he does for Trump. Likewise, Ivanka's clothing line doesn't (or at least, shouldn't, but probably does) have anything to do with Trump as president.

*

Online Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 5434
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #590 on: February 09, 2017, 05:04:09 PM »
So... apparently Trump's SCOTUS pick basically told a senator how Trump's attacks on the judges who are blocking his ban was disheartening and demoralizing.
Trump accuses the senator who tweeted the words a liar.
Gorsuch's office then says "No no, that's true.  That's exactly what he said."

http://www.factcheck.org/2017/02/trumps-baffling-tweet-on-gorsuch/

So, Donald Trump, once again, lied in an effort to discredit someone.  How can anyone support him is beyond me.  His supporters are a cult and even if they all saw him having wild sex with a bunch of Mexican boys in church on Christmas, they would STILL support him.

It's Sad.  It's really just sad.

Re: Trump
« Reply #591 on: February 09, 2017, 05:53:51 PM »
It's Sad.  It's really just sad.

Please reserve your pity. What's even sadder is how butthurt you are over the whole thing. Your equally bad- if not infinitally worse- candidate lost. You would be defending all of her bullshit too. Luckily, since Trump whooped her ass, we never had to watch you make that shameful switch from your high horse to the apologist.

And please, get laid man.

Re: Trump
« Reply #592 on: February 09, 2017, 05:56:54 PM »
So... apparently Trump's SCOTUS pick basically told a senator how Trump's attacks on the judges who are blocking his ban was disheartening and demoralizing.
Trump accuses the senator who tweeted the words a liar.
Gorsuch's office then says "No no, that's true.  That's exactly what he said."

Incredible. Every day. Every single day he gives everyone a fresh reason to hate him.



Your equally bad- if not infinitally worse- candidate lost.

Yes, Hillary lost. Stop using her as an excuse for the turds Trump lays on a daily basis.

Re: Trump
« Reply #593 on: February 09, 2017, 06:51:10 PM »
Your equally bad- if not infinitally worse- candidate lost.

Yes, Hillary lost. Stop using her as an excuse for the turds Trump lays on a daily basis.

As I said, luckily we don't live in that alternate reality, of course I would have loved to see how critical you guys would have been against her policies (lol)

*

Online Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 5434
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #594 on: February 09, 2017, 07:11:19 PM »
It's Sad.  It's really just sad.

Please reserve your pity. What's even sadder is how butthurt you are over the whole thing. Your equally bad- if not infinitally worse- candidate lost. You would be defending all of her bullshit too. Luckily, since Trump whooped her ass, we never had to watch you make that shameful switch from your high horse to the apologist.

And please, get laid man.
You know, I'm starting to wonder if your a shill.  Or just angry.

ps. you sound like you need to get laid far more than I.  Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to have some time alone with my wife.

Re: Trump
« Reply #595 on: February 09, 2017, 08:29:27 PM »
It's Sad.  It's really just sad.

Please reserve your pity. What's even sadder is how butthurt you are over the whole thing. Your equally bad- if not infinitally worse- candidate lost. You would be defending all of her bullshit too. Luckily, since Trump whooped her ass, we never had to watch you make that shameful switch from your high horse to the apologist.

And please, get laid man.
You know, I'm starting to wonder if your a shill.  Or just angry.

ps. you sound like you need to get laid far more than I.  Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to have some time alone with my wife.

I'm the angry one? Please show me anywhere on anything I've typed that can be remotely interpreted as Anger. If anything I get joy from how frustrated and angry you appear. There seems to be a lot of negative energy and frustration in your words. I'm glad you realized that some time away from venting your rage and distaste for American politics on a Flat Earth message board would be good for you, and have decided to spend some quality time with another human being.

I'm sorry, I'm not sorry. No matter how much you want to shame me into changing my fundamental beliefs, I'm not ashamed. I'm not interested in hypocritical partisan faux outrage. I didn't do it with Obama and I'm not going to do it with Trump. You people are no better than the people who called Obama a Gun-grabbing Muslim Nazi Dictator.

ps. I thought you were better than "I know you are but what am I" retorts.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2017, 08:31:30 PM by TheTruthIsOnHere »

*

Online honk

  • *
  • Posts: 1709
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #596 on: February 09, 2017, 09:05:36 PM »
I'm sorry, I'm not sorry. No matter how much you want to shame me into changing my fundamental beliefs, I'm not ashamed. I'm not interested in hypocritical partisan faux outrage. I didn't do it with Obama and I'm not going to do it with Trump. You people are no better than the people who called Obama a Gun-grabbing Muslim Nazi Dictator.

We're talking about Trump and his behavior, not your fundamental beliefs. And there's nothing "hypocritical" about the response to his hijinks. This isn't a both-sides-do-it type of deal. What Trump does is not normal, and has not been done before by presidents or presidential candidates, at least not in modern times. The frequent Twitter temper tantrums, the juvenile name-calling, the constant lying about such trivial, obvious things, the openly-hostile relationship with the press, the lambasting of a judge who made a ruling he didn't like, the inability to even handle a SNL parody of himself, etc. This is all unique to Trump. Bush and Obama didn't do it, McCain and Romney didn't do it, and Hillary wouldn't have done it.
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y

*

Online Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 5434
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Re: Trump
« Reply #597 on: February 09, 2017, 09:16:31 PM »
I'm the angry one? Please show me anywhere on anything I've typed that can be remotely interpreted as Anger. If anything I get joy from how frustrated and angry you appear. There seems to be a lot of negative energy and frustration in your words. I'm glad you realized that some time away from venting your rage and distaste for American politics on a Flat Earth message board would be good for you, and have decided to spend some quality time with another human being.
Oh it's pretty obvious to anyone with half a brain.  Every time we ask you to provide proof you dodge the question and attack us.  But you could just be a shill.
And yes, I am angry at Trump.  Am I not allowed to be angry?

Quote
I'm sorry, I'm not sorry. No matter how much you want to shame me into changing my fundamental beliefs, I'm not ashamed. I'm not interested in hypocritical partisan faux outrage. I didn't do it with Obama and I'm not going to do it with Trump. You people are no better than the people who called Obama a Gun-grabbing Muslim Nazi Dictator.
Then how the hell did someone named Barrack Hussein Obama get elected? His last name rhymed with OSAMA for Christ's sake! lol..

Ted Cruz has a lot more problems than his name. Obama showed that charm can get a lot of things overlooked. Cruz is about as likeable as a wet fart.

Of course, given that you're only a year old on this forum, there isn't much you did speak on about Obama so we only have your word and this quote.

As for your fundamental beliefs, well, see what honk said.  It's true, I don't really care about your fundamental beliefs.  Unless your fundamental beliefs is "Whatever Trump does is right" such as lying, rolling out poorly deployed EOs, insulting anyone who criticizes him, or breaking diplomatic protocols.


Quote
ps. I thought you were better than "I know you are but what am I" retorts.
???   Do you know what that retort means?
It means you insulted me and I said the same thing back at you while maintaining my own innocence.  So you admit to starting the ad hominem?

Re: Trump
« Reply #598 on: February 09, 2017, 09:33:21 PM »
It doesn't matter what I ever said Dave. Just as much as it doesn't matter what Trump ever does. You decided to hate us both. You decided not to value my opinions long ago. I can speak with the plainest of language, and the most direct irrefutable logic possible, and you would ignore or pull out some absurd disqualifier out of your ass.

My fundamental beliefs: Smaller government, personal liberty. From what I can tell, Trump is doing right by that. You might not like it because your core beliefs are obviously something different... I don't have time to debate whether or not socialism works (it doesn't) or disarming law abiding citizens decreases gun violence (it doesn't) but if you think I'm going to sit idly by and not laugh at your misery than you got another thing coming.

Do you really think people are getting paid to be pro-trump on the internet? Like some kind of organization committed to Correcting the Record or some lame shit like that? By the way that Obama quote was completely out of context and you know it. I don't know what anyone could accurately draw from that cherry picked excerpt. Keep digging though, maybe you'll find me getting out of character and being "angry" and throwing temper tantrums like you somewhere, most likely not though.

So if he said "It's getting to the point," instead of "It's gotten to the point," all would be well in the world?

No. You were the one that implied that it makes a difference. If he thinks it's already happening, then he is lying, because it isn't. If he thinks it is going to happen in the future, then why is he accusing the media of something that hasn't happened yet, and why did they provide a list of past events in an attempt to back up the statement?

It is your opinion that it isn't happening.

When they squeeze in a quick blurb about some terrorist plot or attack in between your local murders and the token feel good story on the 5 O' Clock news does that really count as "covering" the attack?

The same people that white washed Hillary Clinton are trying to white wash Islam.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2017, 09:49:42 PM by TheTruthIsOnHere »

Re: Trump
« Reply #599 on: February 09, 2017, 10:04:22 PM »
So if he said "It's getting to the point," instead of "It's gotten to the point," all would be well in the world?

No. You were the one that implied that it makes a difference. If he thinks it's already happening, then he is lying, because it isn't. If he thinks it is going to happen in the future, then why is he accusing the media of something that hasn't happened yet, and why did they provide a list of past events in an attempt to back up the statement?

It is your opinion that it isn't happening.

When they squeeze in a quick blurb about some terrorist plot or attack in between your local murders and the token feel good story on the 5 O' Clock news does that really count as "covering" the attack?

That's the spirit. If you don't like reality, deny it and substitute your own! Trump would be proud!

My fundamental beliefs: Smaller government, personal liberty. From what I can tell, Trump is doing right by that.

I happen to be a fan of those things too. Does that mean we should excuse anything he does as long as he generally sticks to those principles? The lying, incompetence, corruption, diplomatic damage, etc... are all completely excusable?